Accounting & Reporting Standard Supplement to the Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Scope 3 Emissions for Calculating Technical Guidance HFCs PFCs SF 6 processing of (version 1.0) sold products Accounting & Reporting Standard Supplement to the Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) N 2O transportation and distribution use of sold products * * * This document was developed in partnership with the Carbon Trust. # GHG Protocol and Carbon Trust Team Martin Barrow, Carbon Trust Benedict Buckley, World Resources Institute Tom Caldicott, Carbon Trust Tom Cumberlege, Carbon Trust John Hsu, Carbon Trust Scott Kaufman, Carbon Trust Kevin Ramm, Carbon Trust David Rich, World Resources Institute Will Temple-Smith, Carbon Trust # World Resources Institute Contributors Cynthia Cummis, World Resources Institute Laura Draucker, World Resources Institute Sofia Khan, World Resources Institute Janet Ranganathan, World Resources Institute Mary Sotos, World Resources Institute Copyright © World Resources Institute & World Business Council for Sustainable Development, 2013 * * * # Acknowledgments _The GHG Protocol is grateful to the following people and organizations_ _for providing written comments on an earlier draft of this document:_ Gorm Kjærbøll, AB Electrolux Katrina Destree Cochran, Alcatel-Lucent Isabel Bodlak, Allianz SE Arturo Cepeda, Artequim.com Ltd George Vergoulas, Arup Nicola Paczkowski, BASF SE Will Schreiber, Best Food Forward Ricardo Teixeira and Sara Pax, Bluehorse Associates Marshall Chase, BSR Clean Cargo Working Group Frances Way, Carbon Disclosure Project Peggy Foran, The Climate Registry Christopher Gleadle, The CMG Consultancy Michael Van Brunt, Covanta Energy Corporation Dr. Klaus Hufschlag and Patric Pütz, Deutsche Post DHL Rob Rouse, The Dow Chemical Company Dawn Rittenhouse, DuPont Chris Brown and Bernhard Grünauer, E.ON AG Corinne Reich-Weiser, Enviance Daniel Hall, ForestEthics Concepción Jiménez-González, GlaxoSmithKline Thaddeus Owen, Herman Miller Don Adams, Keystone Foods Dr. John Andrews, Landcare Research Maria Atkinson, Lend Lease Sustainability Solutions Jordi Avelleneda and Mads Stensen, Maersk Line and Damco David B. Goldstein, Natural Resources Defense Council Johannes Partl and Duncan Noble, PE International and Five Winds International Jorge Alberto Plauchu Alcantara, Plauchu Consultores Nick Shufro, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP William Lau, SGS-CSTC Standards Technical Services Co., Ltd Zoltán Hajdu, Soltub Ltd. Erika Kloow, TetraPak Yoshikazu Kato, The Japanese Gas Association Yutaka Yoshida, Tokyo Gas Co., Ltd. Alice Douglas, UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) Matt Clouse, John Sottong, and Jesse Miller, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Bryan Steverson, U.S. General Services Administration Keith James, Waste & Resources Action Programme (WRAP) Nisitha Dasanayake _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[03\] * * * * * * Table of Contents Introduction CATEGORIES 1: Purchased Goods and Services 2: Capital Goods 3: Fuel- and Energy-Related Activities Not Included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 4: Upstream Transportation and Distribution 5: Waste Generated in Operations 6: Business Travel 7: Employee Commuting 8: Upstream Leased Assets 9: Downstream Transportation and Distribution 10: Processing of Sold Products 05 20 36 3: Fuel- and Energy-Related Activities Not Included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 38 49 72 81 87 94 102 106 10: Processing of Sold Products 106 11: Use of Sold Products 113 12: End-of-Life Treatment of Sold Products 13: Downstream Leased Assets 14: Franchises 15: Investments APPENDICES A: Sampling 125 128 130 136 153 * * * Introduction n effective corporate climate change strategy requires a detailed understanding of a company’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Until recently, Acompanies have focused on emissions from their own operations under scope 1 and scope 2 of the GHG Protocol. Increasingly companies understand the need to also account for GHG emissions along their value chains and product portfolios to comprehensively manage GHG-related risks and opportunities. The GHG Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard (referred to as the Scope 3 Standard), the parent document to this guidance, offers an internationally accepted method to enable GHG management of companies’ value chains. This guidance document serves as a companion to the Scope 3 Standard to offer companies practical guidance on calculating their scope 3 emissions. It provides information not contained in the Scope 3 Standard, such as methods for calculating GHG emissions for each of the 15 scope 3 categories, data sources, and worked examples. * * * Descriptions of scope 3 categories Figure I shows the 15 distinct reporting categories in scope 3 and also shows how scope 3 relates to scope 1 (direct emissions from owned or controlled sources) and scope 2 (indirect emissions from the generation of purchased purchased electricity, steam, heating and cooling consumed by the reporting company). Scope 3 includes all other indirect emissions that occur in a company’s value chain. The 15 categories in scope 3 are intended to provide companies with a systematic framework to measure, manage, and reduce emissions across a corporate value chain. The categories are designed to be mutually exclusive to avoid a company double counting emissions among categories. Table I gives descriptions of each of the 15 categories. The Scope 3 Standard requires companies to quantify and report scope 3 emissions from each category. Figure \[I\] Overview of GHG Protocol scopes and emissions across the value chain CO2 CH4 N2O HFCs CO2 CH4 N2O HFCs operations employee commuting leased assets Source: Figure 1.1 of leased assets employee investmentsScope 3 Standard.commuting leased assets commuting * * * Table \[I\] Description and boundaries of scope 3 categories Upstream scope 3 emissions Category description | Category | Category description | Minimum boundary | | --- | --- | --- | | 1\. Purchased goods and services | Extraction, production,and transportation of goods and services purchased or acquired by the reporting company in the reporting year,not otherwise included in Categories 2-8 | All upstream(cradle-to-gate) emissions of purchased goods and services | | 2\. Capital goods | Extraction,production,and transportation of capital goods purchased or acquired by the reporting company in the reporting year | All upstream(cradle-to-gate) emissions of purchased capital goods | | 3.Fuel-and energy-related activities(not included in scope 1 or scope 2) | Extraction,production,and transportation of fuels and energy purchased or acquired by the reporting company in the reporting year,not already accounted for in scope 1 or scope 2,including:a.Upstream emissions of purchasedfuels(extraction,production,and transportation of fuels consumedby the reporting company)b.Upstream emissions of purchasedelectricity(extraction,production,and transportation of fuels consumedin the generation ofelectricity,steam,heating,andcooling consumedby the reporting company)c.Transmission and distribution(T&D)losses(generation of electricity,steam,heating and cooling thatis consumed(i.e.,lost)in a T&D system)-reported by end userd.Generation of purchasedelectricitythat is sold to end users(generationof electricity,steam,heating,andcooling that is purchased bythe reporting company and sold to endusers)-reported by utility companyor energy retailer only | a.For upstream emissions ofpurchasedfuels:All upstream(cradle-to-gate) emissions ofpurchasedfuels(from raw materialextraction up to the point of,butexcluding combustion)b.For upstream emissions ofpurchasedelectricity:All upstream(cradle-to-gate) emissions ofpurchasedfuels(from raw materialextraction up to the point of,butexcluding,combustion by a powergenerator)c.For T&D losses:All upstream(cradle-to-gate) emissions ofenergy consumed in a T&Dsystem,including emissions fromcombustiond.对于 generation of purchasedelectricity that is sold to end users:Emissions from the generation ofpurchased energy | Minimum boundary d. Generation of purchased electricity that is sold to end users (generation of electricity, steam, heating, and cooling that is purchased by the reporting company and sold to end users) – reported by utility company or energy retailer only c.ransmission and distribution (T&D) T losses (generation of electricity, steam, heating and cooling that is consumed (i.e., lost) in a T&D system) – reported by end user • All upstream (cradle-to-gate) emissions of purchased goods and services • All upstream (cradle-to-gate) emissions of purchased capital goods a. For upstream emissions of purchased fuels: All upstream (cradle-to-gate) emissions of purchased fuels (from raw material extraction up to the point of, but excluding combustion) b.or upstream emissions of F purchased electricity: All upstream (cradle-to-gate) emissions of purchased fuels (from raw material extraction up to the point of, but excluding, combustion by a power generator) d. For generation of purchased electricity that is sold to end users: Emissions from the generation of purchased energy * * * Table \[I\] Description and boundaries of scope 3 categories (continued) Category | Category | Category description | Minimum boundary | | --- | --- | --- | | 4\. Upstream transportation and distribution | Transportation and distribution of products purchased by the reporting company in the reporting year between a company's tier 1 suppliers and its own operations(in vehicles and facilities not owned or controlled by the reporting company)Transportation and distribution services purchased by the reporting company in the reporting year, including inbound logistics, outbound logistics(e.g.,of sold products),and transportation and distribution between a company's own facilities(in vehicles and facilities not owned or controlled by the reporting company) | The scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of transportation and distribution providers that occur during use of vehicles and facilities(e.g.,from energy use)Optional:The life cycle emissions associated with manufacturing vehicles,facilities,or infrastructure | | 5.Waste generated in operations | Disposal and treatment of waste generated in the reporting company's operations in the reporting year(in facilities not owned or controlled by the reporting company) | The scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of waste management suppliers that occur during disposal or treatmentOptional:Emissions from transportation of waste | | 6.Business travel | Transportation of employees for business-related activities during the reporting year(in vehicles not owned or operated by the reporting company) | The scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of transportation carriers that occur during use of vehicles(e.g.,from energy use)Optional:The life cycle emissions associated with manufacturing vehicles or infrastructure | | 7.Employee commuting | Transportation of employees between their homes and their worksites during the reporting year(in vehicles not owned or operated by the reporting company) | The scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of employees and transportation providers that occur during use of vehicles(e.g.,from energy use)Optional:Emissions from employee teleworking | | 8.Upstream leased assets | Operation of assets leased by the reporting company(assigned to the reporting company) | The scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of leased assets during the operation | 4. eam Upstr transportation and distribution Category description 5. aste generated W in operations • Transportation and distribution of products purchased by the reporting company in the reporting year between a company’s tier 1 suppliers and its own operations (in vehicles and facilities not owned or controlled by the reporting company) • Transportation and distribution services Minimum boundary • Transportation and distribution services purchased by the reporting company in the reporting year, including inbound logistics, outbound logistics (e.g., of sold products), and transportation and distribution between a company’s own facilities (in vehicles and facilities not owned or controlled by the reporting company) 7. yee Emplo commuting • Operation of assets leased by the reporting company (lessee) in the reporting year and not included in scope 1 and scope 2 – reported by lessee • The scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of transportation and distribution providers that occur during use of vehicles and facilities (e.g., from energy use) • Optional: The life cycle emissions • Optional: The life cycle emissions associated with manufacturing vehicles, facilities, or infrastructure • The scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of waste management suppliers that occur during disposal or treatment • Optional: Emissions from • The scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of employees and transportation providers that occur during use of vehicles (e.g., from energy use) • Optional: Emissions from employee • Optional: Emissions from employee teleworking • The scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of lessors that occur during the reporting company’s operation of leased assets (e.g., from energy use) • Optional: The life cycle emissions • Optional: The life cycle emissions associated with manufacturing or constructing leased assets * * * Table \[I\] Description and boundaries of scope 3 categories (continued) Downstream scope 3 emissions | Category | Category description | Minimum boundary | | --- | --- | --- | | 9\. Downstream transportation and distribution | Transportation and distribution of products sold by the reporting company in the reporting year between the reporting company's operations and the end consumer (if not paid for by the reporting company), including retail and storage (in vehicles and facilities not owned or controlled by the reporting company) | The scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of transportation providers, distributors, and retailers that occur during use of vehicles and facilities (e.g., from energy use) | | Optional: The life cycle emissions associated with manufacturing vehicles, facilities, or infrastructure | | | | 10\. Processing of sold products | Processing of intermediate products sold in the reporting year by downstream companies (e.g., manufacturers) | The scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of downstream companies that occur during processing (e.g., from energy use) | | 11\. Use of sold products | End use of goods and services sold by the reporting company in the reporting year | The direct use-phase emissions of sold products over their expected lifetime (i.e., the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of end users that occur from the use of: products that directly consume energy (fuels or electricity) during use; fuels and feedstocks; and GHGs and products that contain or form GHGs that are emitted during use) | | Optional: The indirect use-phase emissions of sold products over their expected lifetime (i.e., emissions from the use of products that indirectly consume energy (fuels or electricity) during use) | | | | 12\. End-of-life treatment of sold products | Waste disposal and treatment of products sold by the reporting company (in the reporting year) at the end of their life | The scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of waste management companies that occur during disposal or treatment of sold products | | 13\. Downstream leased assets | Operation of assets owned by the reporting company (lessor) and leased to other entities in the reporting year, not included in scope 1 and scope 2 reported by lessor | The scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of lessees that occur during operation of leased assets (e.g., from energy use). | | Optional: The life cycle emissions associated with manufacturing or constructing leased assets | | | * * * Table \[I\] Description and boundaries of scope 3 categories (continued) Downstream scope 3 emissions Category 14. Franchises Category description 15. Investments Minimum boundary • Operation of investments (including equity and debt investments and project finance) in the reporting year, not included in scope 1 or scope 2 • The scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of franchisees that occur during operation of franchises (e.g., from energy use) • Optional: The life cycle emissions • Optional: The life cycle emissions associated with manufacturing or constructing franchises Source: Table 5.4 from the Scope 3 Standard • See the description of category 15 (Investments) in section 5.5 for the required and optional boundaries How to use this document The 15 sections in this document correspond to the 15 scope 3 categories in table II. Each section follows the structure below: •• Category description (from chapter 5 of the Scope 3 Standard) •• •• Summary of calculation methods (and decision tree if applicable) •• For each calculation method: •• For each calculation method: •• Activity data needed •• Data collection guidance •• Calculation formula The Scope 3 Standard contains a lot of important information that is not repeated in this calculation guidance document, including business goals for conducting a scope 3 assessment; accounting and reporting principles; setting the scope 3 boundary; setting reduction targets; and reporting. This document should be used in conjunction with the Scope 3 Standard when calculating emissions. The following Scope 3 Standard chapters contain information that is especially relevant to performing various emissions calculations: •• Example(s) •• Chapter 7, which provides guidance on collecting data, including prioritizing data collection efforts, selecting among different types of data, and ensuring data quality •• Chapter 8, which provides guidance on allocating emissions •• Chapter 8, which provides guidance on allocating emissions •• Chapter 10, which describes assurance procedures •• Calculation formula •• Example(s) •• Chapter 11, which defines scope 3 reporting requirements •• Appendix B, which describes uncertainty in scope 3 inventories •• Appendix C, which describes how to create a data management plan •• Appendix C, which describes how to create a data management plan * * * _Introduction_ # Selecting calculation methods For most scope 3 categories, this document offers multiple calculation methods. Within each section, the calculation methods are ranked in order of specificity, 1 from most to least specific to a company’s actual activities. In general, more specific methods yield higher quality scope 3 emissions data whereas less specific methods yield lower quality scope 3 emissions data. However, the more specific methods are often more time and labor intensive. The best method for each category depends on factors described below. Companies should select calculation methods for each scope 3 activity within a category based on the following criteria: **••** The relative size of the emissions from the scope 3 activity **••** The company’s business goals (see chapter 2 of the Scope 3 Standard) **••** Data availability **••** Data quality **••** The cost and effort required to apply each method **••** Other criteria identified by the company. Companies should select calculation methods that ensure that the inventory appropriately reflects the GHG emissions of the activities and serves the decision-making needs of users, both internal and external to the company. Note that each scope 3 category may contain multiple activities (for example air travel and road travel could be two different activities within category 6, Business travel). If appropriate, different calculation methods can be used to calculate emissions from different activities within a category. This guide uses the term “should” to indicate recommendations for calculations. Companies are required to report a description of the methodologies used to calculate emissions for each scope 3 category (see chapter 9 of the Scope 3 Standard). # Screening to prioritize data collection The Scope 3 Standard recommends that companies identify which scope 3 activities are expected to have the most significant GHG emissions, offer the most significant GHG reduction opportunities, and are most relevant to the company’s business goals. Companies should begin by conducting a screening process, using less specific data, to determine the size of GHG emissions in each of the 15 categories. Then each category can be examined to determine whether to further refine its emission estimates. This document offers guidance on how to decide which categories require a more precise, and often more labor-intensive, method of data collection, and which might be adequately served by a less precise method. In most cases, the categories that generate the largest amount of emissions should receive the most precise data collection treatment, however, some smaller categories that are important to customers or employees may benefit from more precise treatment as well. Categories most relevant to the company’s business goals may also receive more attention. The business goals most frequently cited by companies as reasons for developing a scope 3 inventory were to: (1) identify and understand the risks and opportunities associated with value chain emissions; (2) identify GHG reduction opportunities, set reduction targets, and track performance; and (3) engage value chain partners in GHG management. See chapter 2 of the Scope 3 Standard. 1 If a calculation method is specific to a company’s activity, the calculation is based on data relating directly to the particular activity in question, such as data collected from a transport provider relating to journeys carried out. In contrast, less specific methods use data that does not directly relate to the activity, such as industry average emission factors. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[11\] * * * _Introduction_ Collecting higher quality data for priority activities allows companies to focus resources on the most significant GHG emissions in the value chain, more effectively set reduction targets, and track and demonstrate GHG reductions over time. As a result of the screening, a company might decide that, in addition to using more precise data for activities with the most emissions, it will seek higher quality data for activities that present the most significant risks and opportunities in the value chain, and for activities where more accurate data can be easily obtained. Conversely, it may choose to rely on relatively less accurate data for activities that are expected to have insignificant emissions or where accurate data is difficult to obtain. To start the screening, a company can apply the criteria in table II to each of the 15 categories to find out where the bulk of its scope 3 GHG emissions occur. Note that to facilitate the initial screening, companies can use the less specific calculation methods listed for each category (i.e., the methods at the bottom of the decision trees). See section 7.1 of the Scope 3 Standard for more guidance on prioritizing data collection efforts. More specific methods can be applied later to priority categories. ## Table \[II\] Criteria for identifying relevant scope 3 activities ## Criteria Description of activities **Size** They contribute significantly to the company’s total anticipated scope 3 emissions **Influence** There are potential emissions reductions that could be undertaken or influenced by the company **Risk** They contribute to the company’s risk exposure (e.g., climate change related risks such as financial, regulatory, supply chain, product and technology, compliance/litigation, and reputational risks) **Stakeholders** They are deemed critical by key stakeholders (e.g., customers, suppliers, investors or civil society) **Outsourcing** They are outsourced activities previously performed in-house or activities outsourced by the reporting company that are typically performed in-house by other companies in the reporting company’s sector **Sector guidance** They have been identified as significant by sector-specific guidance **Spending or** They are areas that require a high level of spending or generate a high level of revenue **revenue analysis** (and are sometimes correlated with high GHG emissions) **Other** They meet any additional criteria developed by the company or industry sector Source: Adapted from table 6.1 from the Scope 3 Standard _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[12\] * * * Using a combination of calculation methods Companies may use a combination of calculation methods for various scope 3 categories throughout the inventory, as well as for various scope 3 activities within each scope 3 category. For example, within each scope 3 category, a company may use more specific methods for the activities that contribute most to emissions and less specific methods for the activities that contribute least to emissions. Companies should take practical approaches to reduce costs and complexity without overly compromising quality. These may include: •• Applying more accurate data/calculations for large contributors •• •• Applying less accurate data/calculations for small contributors •• Grouping or combining similar activity data (e.g., goods and services) •• Grouping or combining similar activity data (e.g., goods and services) •• Obtaining data from representative samples and extrapolating the results to the whole •• Obtaining data from representative samples and extrapolating the results to the whole •• Using proxy techniques. •• Using proxy techniques. Example: Using a combination of calculation methods A coffee company purchased coffee beans from 100 different suppliers in the reporting year. If 10 of these suppliers account for 85 percent of the quantity of purchased beans, the company may decide to calculate emissions associated with the coffee beans from these 10 suppliers using primary data collected from the suppliers, either using the “supplier-specific method” or the “hybrid method” (see chapter 1 for descriptions of the calculation methods for scope 3 category 1). The company may then choose to extrapolate to 100 percent based on the 85 percent of the beans for which data was collected. The company spent a total of $20 million on purchasing coffee beans. The company also purchased a small quantity of sugar, totaling $1 million for the year. As the sugar only accounts for a small proportion of the company’s total expenditure, the company may choose not to engage with the sugar suppliers, but instead use secondary emission factors, using either the “average-data method” or the “spend-based method.” Overview of data types Calculating emissions requires the use of two types of data: activity data and emission factors. “Activity data” is a quantitative measure of a level of activity that results in GHG emissions (for example, liters of fuel consumed, or kilograms of material purchased). An “emission factor” is a factor that converts activity data into GHG emissions data (for example kg CO2 emitted per liter of fuel consumed, or kg CO2 emitted per kilograms of material produced). More examples of activity data and emission factors are provided in table 7.2 in the Scope 3 Standard. Calculating emissions requires the use of two types of data: activity data and emission factors. * * * Material/product emission factors in scope 3 accounting Two types of emission factors can be used for calculating emissions associated with a material or product: •• Life cycle emission factors, which include emissions that occur at every stage of a material/product’s life, from raw material acquisition or generation of natural resource to end of life •• •• Cradle-to-gate (sometimes referred to as “upstream”) emission factors, which include all emissions that occur in the life cycle of a material/product up to the point of sale by the producer. In general, cradle-to-gate emission factors should be used to calculate emissions associated with goods or services (e.g. category 1 (Purchased goods and services) and category 2 (Capital goods). Energy emission factors in scope 3 accounting Two types of emission factors are used to convert energy activity data into emissions data: Two types of emission factors are used to convert energy activity data into emissions data: •• Life cycle emission factors, which include not only the emissions that occur from combusting the fuel, but all other emissions that occur in the life cycle of the fuel such as emissions from extraction, processing, and transportation •• Combustion emission factors, which include only the emissions that occur from combusting the fuel. Companies should use life cycle emission factors to calculate scope 3 emissions related to fuels and energy consumed in the reporting company’s value chain, except for category 3 (Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in scope 1 or scope 2). Combustion emission factors are used to calculate scope 1 emissions (in the case of fuels) and scope 2 emissions (in the case of electricity). Two activities within scope 3 category 3 require special consideration when selecting emission factors: •• Upstream emissions of purchased fuels (i.e., extraction, production, and transportation of fuels consumed by the reporting company) •• Upstream emissions of purchased electricity (i.e., extraction, production, and transportation of fuels consumed •• Upstream emissions of purchased electricity (i.e., extraction, production, and transportation of fuels consumed in the generation of electricity, steam, heating, and cooling that is consumed by the reporting company). To calculate emissions from these two activities, companies should use emission factors that include upstream emissions (i.e., extraction, production, and transportation) but exclude emissions from combustion, since emissions from combustion are accounted for in scope 1 (in the case of fuels), in scope 2 (in the case of electricity), and in a separate memo item (in the case of direct CO2 emissions from combustion of biomass or biofuels). See Chapter 3 of the Scope 3 Standard. For each of the 15 scope 3 categories, companies are required to calculate emissions of all the GHGs required by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)/Kyoto Protocol at the time the inventory is being compiled. National reporting guidelines under the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol require that specific GHGs be included in national GHG emissions inventories. To remain consistent with national inventory practices, the GHG Protocol requires that these same GHGs also be reported in corporate GHG emissions inventories. Originally, the requirements of the UNFCCC/Kyoto Protocol, and therefore of the GHG Protocol, were limited to a set of six individual GHGs or classes of GHGs: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulphur hexafluoride (SF6). However, changes to international accounting and reporting rules under the UNFCCC/Kyoto Protocol now also require the reporting of another GHG, nitrogen trifluoride (NF3). These emission factors that exclude combustion are referred to as “upstream emission factors,” since they include all life cycle stages of the fuel up to but excluding the final stage – combustion. Applicable greenhouse gases and global warming potential values For each of the 15 scope 3 categories, companies are required to calculate emissions of all the GHGs required by the * * * _Introduction_ As the Scope 3 Standard was released before NF3 was added to the list of GHGs covered by UNFCCC/Kyoto Protocol, reporting NF3 was not originally included as a requirement in the Scope 3 Standard. However an amendment has been published on the GHG Protocol website ( [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/)) which supersedes the original requirements of the Scope 3 Standard and it is now a requirement that NF3 be included. In this document, carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions represent emissions of all greenhouse gases, aggregated and converted to units of CO2e using global warming potential (GWP) values. GWP values describe the radiative forcing impact (or degree of harm to the atmosphere) of one unit of a given GHG relative to one unit of carbon dioxide. GWP values convert GHG emissions data for non-CO2 gases into units of CO2e. Companies may either use the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) GWP values agreed to by United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) or the most recent GWP values published by the IPCC. GWP values should be based on a 100-year time horizon. See section 7.2 of the Scope 3 Standard for more information on GWP values. Companies are required to disclose the source of GWP values used to calculate the inventory (see chapter 11 of the Scope 3 Standard). ## Primary data and secondary data Companies may use either primary or secondary data to calculate scope 3 emissions. Table III provides definitions of these types of data. ## Table \[III\] Types of data ## Data type Description **Primary Data** Data from specific activities within a company’s value chain **Secondary Data** Data that is not from specific activities within a company’s value chain Source: Table 7.4 from the Scope 3 Standard. Primary data includes data provided by suppliers or others that directly relate to specific activities in the reporting company’s value chain. Secondary data includes industry-average-data (e.g., from published databases, government statistics, literature studies, and industry associations), financial data, proxy data, and other generic data. In certain cases, companies may use specific data from one activity in the value chain to estimate emissions for another activity in the value chain. This type of data (i.e., proxy data) is considered secondary data, since it is not specific to the activity whose emissions are being calculated. See table 7.4 in the Scope 3 Standard for examples of primary and secondary data by scope 3 category. ## Collecting primary data Primary activity data may be obtained through meter readings, purchase records, utility bills, engineering models, direct monitoring, mass balance, stoichiometry, or other methods for obtaining data from specific activities in the company’s value chain. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[15\] * * * If possible, companies should collect energy or emissions data from suppliers and other value chain partners to obtain site-specific data for priority scope 3 categories and activities (see “Screening to prioritize data collection,” above, for guidance on identifying priority categories). To do so, companies should identify relevant suppliers from which to seek GHG data. Suppliers may include contract manufacturers, materials and parts suppliers, capital equipment suppliers, fuel suppliers, third-party logistics providers, waste management companies, and other companies that provide goods and services to the reporting company. In general, companies should seek activity data or emissions data from suppliers that are as specific as possible to the product purchased from the supplier, following the hierarchy in table IV. Table \[IV\] Levels of data (ranked in order of specificity) | Data Type | Description | | --- | --- | | Product-level data | Cradle-to-gate GHG emissions for the product of interest | | Activity-, process-, or production line-level data | GHG emissions and/or activity data for the activities, processes, or production lines that produce the product of interest | | Facility-level data | GHG emissions and/or activity data for the facilities or operations that produce the product of interest | | Business-unit-level data | GHG emissions and/or activity data for the business units that produce the product of interest | | Corporate-level data | GHG emissions and/or activity data for the entire corporation | Source: Table 7.7 from the Scope 3 Standard. The secondary data sources included in the calculation resources of each category are examples and not an exhaustive list. The GHG Protocol website has a more comprehensive list of secondary data sources at: [http://www.ghgprotocol](http://www.ghgprotocol/). org/Third-Party-Databases. For more information on collecting primary data and guidance on issues such as how to treat the confidentiality concerns of suppliers, refer to section 7.4 of the Scope 3 Standard. Collecting secondary data When using secondary databases, companies should prefer those that are internationally recognized, provided by For additional guidance on prioritizing data collection efforts, selecting data, collecting data, and filling data gaps, see chapter 7 of the Scope 3 Standard. * * * Environmentally-extended input output (EEIO) data Environmentally-extended input output (EEIO) models estimate energy use and/or GHG emissions resulting from the production and upstream supply chain activities of different sectors and products in an economy. The resulting EEIO emissions factors can be used to estimate cradle-to-gate GHG emissions for a given industry or product category. EEIO data are particularly useful in screening emissions sources when prioritizing data collection efforts. EEIO models are derived by allocating national GHG emissions to groups of finished products based on economic flows between industry sectors. The output of EEIO models is typically a quantity of GHGs emitted per unit of revenue in a particular industry sector. For example, an EEIO model may estimate that the sector “paper mills” emits 1,520 tonnes CO2e per $1 million revenue, meaning that, on average, 1,520 tonnes of CO2e are emitted during all upstream supply chain activities associated with generating $1 million revenue from that sector. \\mathrm{C O}\_{2}\\mathsf{e} \\mathrm{C O}\_{2} The advantages of EEIO data include: •• Comprehensive coverage of the entire economy (i.e., no emissions sources are excluded from the system boundary) •• •• Simplicity of method and application •• •• Time and cost savings as data requirements are less onerous than in a process-based approach. The disadvantages of EEIO data include: •• Broad sector averages may not represent nuances of unique processes and products, especially for nonhomogenous sectors •• Assumption of linear attribution between monetary and environmental flows provides only indicative results (i.e., •• Assumption of linear attribution between monetary and environmental flows provides only indicative results (i.e., EEIO models cannot distinguish between products of different monetary value within a single sector) •• Lacks specificity and accuracy of process-based approaches •• Lacks specificity and accuracy of process-based approaches •• Difficult to measure and demonstrate results of reduction efforts •• Difficult to measure and demonstrate results of reduction efforts •• •• EEIO databases are generally limited to a specific geographic region, (e.g., United States) and are not available in some world regions. Process-based data is derived from assessing all the known energy and environmental inputs of a particular process and calculating the direct emissions associated with the outputs of the process. It is particularly applicable for unique processes and individual product level analysis. •• High level of specificity and focus •• Detailed analysis and possibility of unique insights to particular processes The advantages of process-based data include: •• Collection of data may be time, cost, and labor intensive •• Lack of comparability as the system boundary and the data are selected by the practitioner •• Detailed analysis and possibility of unique insights to particular processes •• Straightforward concept. •• Lack of comparability as the system boundary and the data are selected by the practitioner •• The disadvantages of process based data include: •• Data requirements may render large-scale, multi-product analysis impractical. * * * _Introduction_ _**Combining EEIO and process-based data**_ Companies may combine the top down EEIO approach with the bottom-up, process-based approach to leverage the benefits of both approaches. For example, the upstream emissions of purchased goods could be calculated using an EEIO approach, whereas downstream emissions from use and end-of-life could be calculated using a process-based approach. Companies are required to report a description of the types and sources of data used to calculate emissions for each scope 3 category (see chapter 11 of the Scope 3 Standard). _**Using proxy data to fill data gaps**_ Companies should use the guidance in section 7.3 of the Scope 3 Standard, “Guidance for selecting data” to assess the quality of available data. If data of sufficient quality are not available, companies may use proxy data to fill data gaps. Proxy data is data from a similar activity that is used as a stand-in for the given activity. Proxy data can be extrapolated, scaled up, or customized to be more representative of the given activity (e.g., partial data for an activity can be extrapolated or scaled up to represent 100 percent of the activity). If a large company has access to 80 out of 100 manufacturing facilities it can extrapolate this information to fill the gap. It would first group the activity data by similar characteristics, such as facility type or location, then calculate an intensity ratio for a group of facilities where data is available (e.g., quantity of emissions per unit of production output). This figure can then be applied to the unknown facilities in that group. Section 7.5 of the Scope 3 Standard “Guidance for collecting secondary data and filling data gaps” provides more information on the use of proxy data and its advantages and disadvantages. If data are unavailable for a large number of sites or if a company needs to collect a large quantity of data for a scope 3 category, but finds it impractical or impossible to collect data from each individual activity, the company may use appropriate sampling techniques to extrapolate data from a representative sample of activities. See Appendix A for guidance on sampling methods. ## Improving data quality over time Collecting data, assessing data quality, and improving data quality is an iterative process. When selecting data sources, companies should first apply data quality indicators and assess data quality, then review the quality of the collected data, using the same data quality assessment approach. In their initial years of scope 3 data collection, companies may need to use data of relatively low quality due to limited availability. Over time, companies should seek to improve the data quality of the inventory by replacing lower quality data with higher quality data as it becomes available. In particular, companies should prioritize data quality improvement for activities that have: **••** Relatively low data quality **••** Relatively high emissions. Companies are required to provide a description of the data quality of reported scope 3 emissions data to ensure transparency and avoid misinterpretation of data (see chapter 11 of the Scope 3 Standard). Refer to section 7.3 for guidance on describing data quality; Appendix B for guidance on uncertainty; and section 9.3 for guidance on recalculating base year emissions when making improvements in data quality over time. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[18\] * * * _Introduction_ It is unlikely that all of a company’s relevant suppliers will be able to provide it with GHG inventory data. (See table 7.8 of the Scope 3 Standard for a list of challenges and guidance for collecting primary data from suppliers.) In such cases, companies should encourage suppliers to develop GHG inventories in the future and may communicate their efforts to encourage more suppliers to provide GHG emissions data in the public report. If changes in data quality result in significant differences in emissions estimates, companies are required to recalculate base year emissions applying the new data sources. Refer to page 106 of the Scope 3 Standard for guidance on base year recalculations for improvements in data accuracy over time. Appendix C of the Scope 3 Standard also provides a useful resource for developing a data management plan and improving data management. # GHG Protocol publications and tools Several GHG publications and calculation tools offer help in calculating emissions from various scope 3 categories. In particular, several cross-sector and sector-specific calculation tools available on the GHG Protocol website ( [http://www](http://www/). ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools) provide step-by-step guidance together with electronic worksheets to help companies calculate GHG emissions from specific sources or sectors. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[19\] * * * _**1**_ ### Category 1: Purchased Goods and Services #### Category description his category includes all upstream (i.e., cradle-to-gate) emissions from the production #### of products purchased or acquired by the reporting company in the reporting year. # TProducts include both goods (tangible products) and services (intangible products). Category 1 includes emissions from all purchased goods and services not otherwise included in the other categories of upstream scope 3 emissions (i.e., category 2 through category 8). Specific categories of upstream emissions are separately reported in category 2 through category 8 to enhance the transparency and consistency of scope 3 reports. Emissions from the transportation of purchased products from a tier one (direct) supplier to the reporting company (in vehicles not owned or controlled by the reporting company) are accounted for in category 4 (Upstream transportation and distribution). Companies may find it useful to differentiate between purchases of production-related products (e.g., materials, components, and parts) and non-production-related products (e.g., office furniture, office supplies, and IT support). This distinction may be aligned with procurement practices and therefore may be a useful way to more efficiently organize and collect data (see box 5.2 of the Scope 3 Standard). #### Summary of methods for calculating emissions from purchased goods and services Companies may use the methods listed below to calculate scope 3 emissions from purchased goods and services. The first two methods – supplier-specific and hybrid – require the reporting company to collect data from the suppliers, whereas the second two methods – average-data and spend-based – use secondary data (i.e. industry average data). These methods are listed in order of how specific2 the calculation is to the individual supplier of a good or service. However, companies need not always use the most specific method as a first preference (see figure 1.1 and box 1.1). x 1.1 for further explanation of the data specificity and data accuracy See Bo _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[20\] * * * •• Supplier-specific method – collects product-level cradle-to-gate GHG inventory data from goods or services suppliers. •• •• Hybrid method – uses a combination of supplier-specific activity data (where available) and secondary data to fill the gaps. This method involves: •• collecting allocated scope 1 and scope 2 emission data directly from suppliers; •• calculating upstream emissions of goods and services from suppliers’ activity data on the amount of materials, •• calculating upstream emissions of goods and services from suppliers’ activity data on the amount of materials, fuel, electricity, used, distance transported, and waste generated from the production of goods and services and applying appropriate emission factors; and •• using secondary data to calculate upstream emissions wherever supplier-specific data is not available. •• using secondary data to calculate upstream emissions wherever supplier-specific data is not available. •• Average-data method – estimates emissions for goods and services by collecting data on the mass (e.g., kilograms •• Average-data method – estimates emissions for goods and services by collecting data on the mass (e.g., kilograms or pounds), or other relevant units of goods or services purchased and multiplying by the relevant secondary (e.g., industry average) emission factors (e.g., average emissions per unit of good or service). 1 2 3 1. wheat •• Spend-based method – estimates emissions for goods and services by collecting data on the economic value of 1 2 3 1. wheat 2\. tree1. wheat •• Spend-based method – estimates emissions for goods and services by collecting data on the economic value of 1 2 3. mountains 3 4\. glass bottle 2. tree 5\. plastic bottle 3. mountains goods and services purchased and multiplying it by relevant secondary (e.g., industry average) emission factors (e.g., 6. aluminium can 7\. factory4. glass bottle 8\. lorry 5. plastic bottle average emissions per monetary value of goods). 9. cloud6. aluminium can 10\. recycling bin 7\. factory 15. cow 2 11. recycling bin (colours 16. shop reversed) Figure \[1.1\] Different data types used for different calculation methods4 5 17. factory showing carbon 61 emissions (carbon 112. wind turbines * * * ## CATEGORY 1 Purchased Goods and Services Collecting data directly from suppliers adds considerable time and cost burden to conducting a scope 3 inventory, so companies should first carry out a screening (see Introduction, “Screening to prioritize data collection”) to prioritize data collection and decide which calculation method is most appropriate to achieve their business goals. ## Box \[1.1\] The difference between data specificity and data accuracy Even though the supplier-specific and hybrid methods are more specific to the individual supplier than the average-data and spend-based methods, they may not produce results that are a more accurate reflection of the product’s contribution to the reporting company’s scope 3 emissions. In fact, data collected from a supplier may actually be less accurate than industry-average data for a particular product. Accuracy derives from the granularity of the emissions data, the reliability of the supplier’s data sources, and which, if any, allocation techniques were used. The need to allocate the supplier’s emissions to the specific products it sells to the company can add a considerable degree of uncertainty, depending on the allocation methods used (for more information on allocation, see chapter 8 of the Scope 3 Standard). Figure 1.2 provides a decision tree to help companies determine the most appropriate calculation method for estimating their category 1 emissions. Companies may use different calculation methods for different types of purchased goods and services within category 1. For example, they can use more specific methods for categories of goods and services that contribute the most to total emissions. The choice of calculation method depends on several factors outlined in the Introduction, including the company’s business goals, the significance (relative to total emissions) of goods and services within category 1, the availability of data, and the quality of available data. See sections 7.3 and 7.4 of the Scope 3 Standard for guidance on assessing data quality. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[22\] * * * Figure \[1.2\] Decision tree for selecting a calculation method for emissions from purchased goods and services Note \* Companies should collect data of sufficient quality to ensure that the inventory: • most appropriately reflects the GHG emissions of the company • supports the company’s business goals for conducting a GHG inventory • serves the decision-making needs of users, both internal and external to the company. For more information on how to determine whether data is of sufficient quality, see section 7.3 of the Scope 3 Standard Source: World Resources Institute * * * ## CATEGORY 1 Purchased Goods and Services ## Supplier-specific method Supplier-specific product-level data is the most accurate because it relates to the specific good or service purchased by the reporting company and avoids the need for allocation (see chapter 8 of the Scope 3 Standard). ## Activity data needed **••** Quantities or units of goods or services purchased ## Emission factors needed **••** Supplier-specific cradle-to-gate emission factors for the purchased goods or services (e.g., if the supplier has conducted a reliable cradle-to-gate GHG inventory, for example, using the GHG Protocol Product Standard). ## Data collection guidance Companies may send questionnaires to each relevant supplier or other value chain partner requesting the following: **••** Product life cycle GHG emissions data following the GHG Protocol Product Standard **••** A description of the methodologies used to quantify emissions and a description of the data sources used (including emission factors and GWP values) **••** Whether the data has been assured/verified, and if so, the type of assurance achieved **••** Any other relevant information (e.g., percentage of the product inventory calculated using primary data). Note that to the extent possible, the data provided by the supplier should be for the same time interval as the reporting company’s scope 3 inventory and preference should be given to verified data. When collecting emission factors from suppliers it is recommended that companies also request information relating to the ratio of primary and secondary data used to calculate the emission factor. This information will provide transparency around how much primary data the supplier used to calculate the emission factor for its product. As suppliers become more sophisticated in GHG assessments, the percentage of primary data used to calculate emissions factors for their products is likely to increase. Collecting information on the ratio of primary and secondary data will enable this ratio to be measured and tracked over time. ## Calculation formula \[1.1\] Supplier-specific method ## CO2e emissions for purchased goods or services = ## sum across purchased goods or services: ∑ (quantities of good purchased (e.g., kg) × supplier-specific product emission factor of purchased good or service (e.g., kg CO2e/kg)) _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[24\] * * * Example \[1.1\] Calculating emissions from purchased goods and services using the supplier-specific method Company A is a construction company that purchases materials for its operations. Using its internal IT system, Company A is able to determine the total weight (kg) purchased for each material. Company A collects product-specific emission factors from the supplier for the purchased goods, which were produced as part of the suppliers’ internal GHG inventory reports. | Purchased good | Supplier | Quantities purchased(kg) | Supplier-specific emission factor(kgCO2e/kg) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Cement | Supplier C | 200,000 | 0.15 | | Plaster | Supplier D | 600,000 | 0.10 | | Paint | Supplier E | 200,000 | 0.10 | | Timber | Supplier F | 100,000 | 0.25 | | Concrete | Supplier G | 50,000 | 0.20 | Note: The activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. Total emissions of purchased goods by Company A is calculated as follows: ∑ (quantities of good purchased (e.g., kg) ∑ (quantities of good purchased (e.g., kg) × supplier-specific emission factor of purchased good or service (e.g., kg CO2 \\begin{array}{r}{\\times\\mathrm{s u p p l i e r s p e c f i c ~~e r i i s s i o n~~ f a c t o r ~~o f~~ D u c t h a s e d ~~g o o d~~ o f ~~s e r v i v i c e~~(mathrm e ~~,,mathrm{{\\mathrm~~{g o}}}},\\mathrm{{{\\mathrm{g o}}}},\\mathrm{{{\\mathrm{g o}}}},\\mathrm{{{\\mathrm{g o}}}},\\mathrm{{{\\mathrm{g o}}}},}mathrm{{{{\\mathrm{g o}}}},}mathrm{{{{{mathrm{g}}}}})}}\ {=(200,0000\\times0,1.5)+(600,000\\times0.1)+(200,000\\times0.1)+(10.000\\times0.25)}\ {=145,0000\ {mathrm\\mathrm}{{{\\{g{o}}}}}\ {\\mathrm{{{\\mathrm{g,}}}}}\\{{mathrm{{{{g}}}}}}{\\mathrm{{{\\mathrm{{g o}}}}}},}\\end{array} Hybrid method •• Quantities of waste output other emissions. •• Allocated scope 1 and scope 2 data (including emissions from electricity use and fuel use and any process and fugitive emissions). For guidance on allocating emissions, refer to chapter 8 of the Scope 3 Standard •• Mass or volume of material inputs (e.g., bill of materials), mass or volume of fuel inputs used, and distance from the •• Mass or volume of material inputs (e.g., bill of materials), mass or volume of fuel inputs used, and distance from the origin of the raw material inputs to the supplier (the transport emissions from the supplier to the reporting company is calculated in category 4 so it should not be included here) •• Quantities of waste output other emissions. * * * If a supplier cannot provide data on some or all of the items in the list above, the reporting company may combine the available supplier-specific data with secondary data for the other activities. Companies should also collect either: •• Mass or number of units of purchased goods or services (e.g., kg, m3, hours spent, etc.) •• •• Amount spent on purchased goods or services, by product type, using market values (e.g., dollars). Emission factors needed Depending what activity data has been collected from the supplier, companies may need to collect: •• Cradle-to-gate emission factors for materials used by tier 1 supplier to produce purchased goods (Note: these emission factors can either be supplier-specific emission factors provided by the supplier, or industry-average emission factors sourced from a secondary database. In general, preference should be given to more specific and verified emission factors) •• •• Life cycle emission factors for fuel used by incoming transport of input materials to tier 1 supplier •• Emission factors for waste outputs by tier 1 suppliers to produce purchased goods •• Emission factors for waste outputs by tier 1 suppliers to produce purchased goods •• •• Other emission factors as applicable (e.g., process emissions). The secondary emission factors required will also depend on what data is available for the purchased good. Companies will need to collect either: •• Cradle-to-gate emission factors of the purchased goods or services per unit of economic value (e.g., kg CO2e/$). Data collection guidance To combine the primary data collected from the supplier with secondary data (to fill the gaps), the secondary emission factors must be disaggregated so the necessary elements can be overwritten with the supplier-specific data. For example, if a company collects only scope 1, scope 2, and waste data from the supplier, all other upstream emissions need to be estimated using secondary data (see example 1.3 below). The reporting company may request the following information from suppliers to assist calculation: •• Internal data systems (e.g., bill of materials, freight distance of incoming raw materials) •• Public GHG inventory reports accessible through GHG reporting programs. •• Public GHG inventory reports accessible through GHG reporting programs. •• Industry associations •• For activity data, emission factors, and formulas for process and fugitive emissions, see the GHG Protocol website ( [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools)) and the IPCC 2006 Guidelines ( [http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges](http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges/). or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html). * * * ## CATEGORY 1 Purchased Goods and Services ## Calculation formula \[1.2\] Hybrid method (where supplier-specific activity data is available for all activities ## associated with producing the purchased goods) ## CO2e emissions for purchased goods and services = ## sum across purchased goods and services: ∑ scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of tier 1 supplier relating to purchased good or service (kg CO2e) + **sum across material inputs of the purchased goods and services:** ∑ (mass or quantity of material inputs used by tier 1 supplier relating to purchased good or service (kg or unit) × cradle-to-gate emission factor for the material (kg CO2e/kg or kg CO2e/unit)) + **sum across transport of material inputs to tier 1 supplier:** ∑ (distance of transport of material inputs to tier 1 supplier (km) × mass or volume of material input (tonnes or TEUs) × cradle-to-gate emission factor for the vehicle type (kg CO2e/tonne or TEU/km)) + **sum across waste outputs by tier 1 supplier relating to purchased goods and services:** ∑ (mass of waste from tier 1 supplier relating to the purchased good or service (kg) × emission factor for waste activity (kg CO2e/kg)) + other emissions emitted in provision of the good or service as applicable If the supplier is not able to provide specific information about its goods or services sold to the company, it may be necessary to allocate the emissions. For example, to calculate the sum of the waste outputs by the tier 1 supplier that relate to the purchased goods, a company can allocate a proportion of the total waste from the supplier’s operations to the purchased product. Guidance on allocation can be found in chapter 8 of the Scope 3 Standard. ## Example \[1.2\] Calculating emissions from purchased goods using the hybrid method Company A prints designs on t-shirts; it purchases the t-shirts from supplier B. Company A obtains the following information about supplier B’s scope 1 and scope 2 emissions and waste generated, relating to the t-shirts sold to Company A. Company A also obtains information regarding supplier B’s material inputs relating to the t-shirts sold to Company A and transport of these material inputs to supplier B. Company A also collects representative emission factors by reference to life cycle databases. Scope 1 and scope 2 data from supplier B relating to production of purchased goods ## Amount (kWh) Emission factor (kg CO2e/kWh) Electricity 5,000 0.5 Natural gas 2,500 0.2 _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[27\] * * * Example \[1.2\] Calculating emissions from purchased goods using the hybrid method (continued) Material inputs of purchased goods | | Mass purchased(kg) | Emission factor(kgCO2e/kg) | | --- | --- | --- | | Cotton | 5000 | 7.0 | | Polymer | 2500 | 5.0 | | Chemical A | 500 | 2.0 | | Chemical B | 500 | 1.5 | Transport of material inputs to supplier B | | Distance of transport(km) | Vehicle type emission factor(kgCO2e/kg/km) | | --- | --- | --- | | Cotton | 1000 | 0.01 | | Polymer | 2500 | 0.02 | | Chemical A | 800 | 0.05 | | Chemical B | 200 | 0.10 | Waste outputs by supplier B relating to production of purchased goods | | Amount(kg) | Emission factor(kgCO2e/kg of waste sent to landfill) | | --- | --- | --- | | Waste sent to landfill | 100 | 0.5 | Note: The activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. * * * ## CATEGORY 1 Purchased Goods and Services ## Example \[1.2\] Calculating emissions from purchased goods using the hybrid method (continued) Emissions at each stage are calculated by multiplying activity data by respective emission factors, as follows: ## scope 1 and scope 2 emissions by supplier B: ∑ scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of supplier B relating to purchased good (kg CO2e) = (5,000 × 0.5) + (2,500 × 0.2) = 3,000 kg CO2e ## material input emissions: ∑ (mass or value of material inputs used by supplier B relating to purchased good (kg or $) × emission factor for the material (kg CO2e/kg or kg CO2e/$)) = (5,000 × 7) + (2,500 × 5) + (500 × 2) + (500 × 1.5) = 49,250 kg CO2e ## transport of material inputs emissions: ∑ (distance of transport of material inputs to supplier B (km) × mass of material input (kg) × emission factor for the vehicle type (kg CO2e/kg/km)) = (5,000 × 1,000 × 0.01) + (2,500 × 2,500 × 0.02) + (500 × 800 × 0.05) + (500 × 200 × 0.1) = 20,500 kg CO2e ## waste output by supplier B: ∑ (mass of waste from supplier B relating to the purchased good (sent to landfill) (kg) × emission factor for waste to landfill (kg CO2e/kg)) = 100 × 0.5 = 50 kg CO2e **total emissions of purchased t-shirts from supplier B is calculated by summing the above results, as follows:** 3,000 + 49,250 + 20,500 + 50 = 72,800 kg CO2e If the reporting company decides that it is not within the company’s business goals to collect all the data needed to calculate emissions based entirely on supplier-specific activity data, the reporting company may choose to use a combination of supplier-specific and average data. This option may be desirable in cases where supplier engagement is part of a company’s business goals for carrying out a scope 3 inventory, but where collecting all the data necessary to calculate a cradle-to-gate emission factor from supplier-specific activity data is not practical. It is likely that many suppliers will not be able to provide all the activity data listed, so this technique of combining some supplier-specific data with secondary data is a possible alternative. Calculation formula 1.3 follows the same structure as calculation formula 1.2. The difference is that where data is unavailable for certain activities, secondary data (either process data or EEIO data) is used to fill the gaps. (See also figure 1.1.). Calculation formula 1.3 shows an example in which only scope 1 and scope 2 data and waste data were collected from the supplier, however, any combination of data could be collected from suppliers and the remaining data estimated using secondary data in the same way. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[29\] * * * Calculation formula \[1.3\] Hybrid method (where only allocated scope 1 and scope 2 emissions and waste data are available from supplier) CO2e emissions for a purchased good where the supplier can only provide scope 1 and scope 2 emissions data and waste generated in operations data = ∑ (mass or quantity of units of purchased good or service (kg) × emission factor of purchased good excluding scope 1, scope 2, and emissions from waste generated by producer (kg CO2e/kg or unit or $)) Example \[1.3\] Calculating emissions from a purchased good by using the hybrid method (where only allocated scope 1 and scope 2 emissions and waste data are available from supplier) Using the same example, company A prints designs on t-shirts; it purchases the t-shirts from supplier B. However, in this case, supplier B only has data available on allocated scope 1 and scope 2 emissions and waste generated in supplier B’s operations (emissions and waste were allocated using physical allocation based on the total output of t-shirts in the reporting year and the quantity of t-shirts sold to Company A). Company A has to estimate the upstream emissions of supplier B using secondary data. Company A collects data on the quantity of t-shirts purchased from supplier B, as well as a cradle-to-gate emission factor for the production of a t-shirt (by reference to life cycle databases). Scope 1 and scope 2 data from supplier B relating to production of purchased goods | | Amount(kg) | Emission factor(kgCO2e/kg of waste sent to landfill) | | --- | --- | --- | | Waste sent to landfill | 100 | 0.5 | * * * Example \[1.3\] Calculating emissions from a purchased good by using the hybrid method (where only allocated scope 1 and scope 2 emissions and waste data are available from supplier) (continued) Quantity of t-shirts purchased from supplier B and cradle-to-gate emission factor from life cycle database. The cradleto-gate process emission factor is from a database where it is possible to disaggregate the stages of the life cycle of the t-shirt. Emissions associated with the manufacture stage were excluded as these represent the emissions of supplier B itself (as opposed to cotton farming, processing, etc., which occur further upstream). | | Number of t-shirts purchased from supplier B | Cradle-to-gate process emission factor(kg CO2e/per t-shirt) | Cradle-to-gate process emission factor(kg CO2e/per t-shirt)(excluding scope 1 and 2 emissions and emissions from waste associated with final producer) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | T-shirts | 12,000 | 6 | 5.6 | Cradle-to-gate process emission factor (kg CO2e/per t-shirt) (excluding scope 1 and 2 emissions and emissions from waste associated with final producer) Note: The activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. Emissions at each stage are calculated by multiplying activity data by respective emission factors, as follows: scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from supplier B: scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from supplier B: ∑ scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of supplier B relating to purchased good (kg CO2 \\begin{array}{r}{\\Sigma,\\mathrm{s c o p e ~~1~~ a n d ~~s c o p e~~ 2 ~~e r i i s t i o g s~~ o f ~~s u p p i i e s~~ o f ~~s u p p l i e g~~ t o ~~p u r c h a s e d~~ g o o d ~~(\\mathrm{k g},\\mathrm{C O}\_~~ mathrm{}!})}\ {=\\left(5,000\\times0.5\\right)+\\left(2,000\\times0.2\\right)}\ {=3,0.000times mathrm G G g,\ \\mathrm{g}}\\end{array} waste output from supplier B: ∑ (mass of waste from supplier B relating to the purchased good (sent to landfill) (kg) ∑ (mass of waste from supplier B relating to the purchased good (sent to landfill) (kg) × emission factor for waste to landfill (kg CO2e/kg)) = 100 × 0.5 = 50 kg CO2e all other upstream emissions from supplier B: ∑ (mass or quantity of units of purchased good or service (kg) ∑ (mass or quantity of units of purchased good or service (kg) \\begin{array}{c}{{=3.000+50+67.200}}\ {{=70.250k\\mathrm!O\ \ !C\ {}}\\{{end * * * ## CATEGORY 1 Purchased Goods and Services ## Average-data method In this method, the company collects data on the mass or other relevant units of purchased goods or services and multiplies them by relevant secondary (e.g., industry average) cradle-to-gate emission factors. Secondary emission factors may be found in process-based life cycle inventory databases. Refer to “Secondary data sources” in the Introduction for further guidance on these databases. ## Activity data needed **••** Mass or number of units of purchased goods or services for a given year (e.g., kg, hours spent). Companies may organize the above data more efficiently by differentiating purchased goods or services into mass and other categories of units (e.g., volume), where appropriate. ## Emission factors needed **••** Cradle-to-gate emission factors of the purchased goods or services per unit of mass or unit of product (e.g., kg CO2e/kg or kg CO2e/hour spent). ## Data collection guidance Data sources for activity data include: **••** Internal data systems (e.g., bill of materials) **••** Purchasing records. ## Data sources for emission factors include: **••** Process life cycle databases **••** Industry associations. Companies should assess both the age of the database (i.e., temporal representativeness) and the geographic relevance to the supplier’s location (e.g., geographical representativeness), as well as the technological representatives, completeness, and reliability of the data. For additional guidance, see sections 7.3 and 7.5 of the Scope 3 Standard. ## Calculation formula \[1.4\] Average-data method ## CO2e emissions for purchased goods or services = ## sum across purchased goods or services: ∑ (mass of purchased good or service (kg) × emission factor of purchased good or service per unit of mass (kg CO2e/kg)) or ∑ (unit of purchased good or service (e.g., piece) × emission factor of purchased good or service per reference unit (e.g., kg CO2e/piece)) _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[32\] * * * Spend-based method If the supplier-specific method, hybrid method, and average-data method are not feasible (e.g., due to data limitations), companies should apply the average spend-based method by collecting data on the economic value of purchased goods and services and multiplying them by the relevant EEIO emission factors. Refer to the “Secondary data sources” in the Introduction for further guidance on EEIO data. Companies may use a combination of the material-based method and spend-based method by using both processbased and EEIO data for various purchased goods and services. Activity data needed •• Amount spent on purchased goods or services, by product type, using market values (e.g., dollars) •• Where applicable, inflation data to convert market values between the year of the EEIO emissions factors and the •• Where applicable, inflation data to convert market values between the year of the EEIO emissions factors and the year of the activity data. Emission factors needed •• •• Cradle-to-gate emission factors of the purchased goods or services per unit of economic value (e.g., kg CO2e/$). Data collection guidance Data sources for activity data include: Data sources for activity data include: •• Internal data systems (e.g., enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems) •• Bill of materials •• Bill of materials •• Purchasing records. Data sources for emission factors include: •• Industry associations. Calculation formula \[1.5\] Spend-based method •• Environmentally-extended input-output (EEIO) databases •• Industry associations. CO2e emissions for purchased goods or services = ∑ (value of purchased good or service ($) × emission factor of purchased good or service per unit of economic value (kg CO2 sum across purchased goods or services: × emission factor of purchased good or service per unit of economic value (kg CO2e/$)) * * * Example \[1.4\] Calculating emissions from purchased goods and services by using a combination of the average-data method and the spend-based method Company E purchases over 1,000 components and raw materials to manufacture a broad range of electronic goods. Instead of obtaining data from all suppliers and allocating emissions between 1,000 separate goods, the company groups purchased goods based on: •• Semi-processed components (e.g., average semiconductor) •• •• Raw materials (e.g., average steel). Physical data (mass) is available only for the semi-processed components. For raw materials, only spend data is available. Company E calculates the mass of semi-processed components by combining primary data available through its IT systems with extrapolation techniques. For raw materials, the company determines the amount spent through its enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. Company E obtains process-based cradle-to-gate emission factors for the semi-processed components and EEIO cradle-to-gate emission factors for the raw materials. The results of the data collection are summarized below: | Purchased semi-processed components | Mass(kg) | Emission factor(kgCO2e/kg) | | --- | --- | --- | | Hard drive | 400 | 20 | | Integrated circuits | 200 | 10 | | Liquid Crystal Display(LCD) | 500 | 40 | | Semiconductors | 100 | 70 | | Battery | 1,500 | 3 | | Keyboard | 300 | 3 | * * * Example \[1.4\] Calculating emissions from purchased goods and services by using a combination of the average-data method and the spend-based method (continued) | Purchased raw materials | Value($) | Emission factor(kg CO2e/$) | | --- | --- | --- | | Plastic(PS) | 5000 | 0.3 | | Plastic(ABS) | 3000 | 0.3 | | PET(film) | 4000 | 0.3 | | Aluminum | 6000 | 0.5 | | Steel | 1500 | 0.2 | | Cyclohexane | 5000 | 0.2 | | Epoxy resin | 5000 | 0.3 | | Copper | 1000 | 0.3 | | Glass | 5000 | 0.4 | Note: the activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. Total emissions of purchased goods by Company E can be calculated by multiplying the mass/value purchased by the respective emission factors and summing the results, as follows: \\begin{array}{c}{{=(400\\times20)+(2.00\\times10)+(5.00\\times40)+(1.00\\times70)+(1.500\\times3)+(3.000\\times3)+(5.000\\times0.3)}}\ {{+(3.000\\times0.3)+(4.000\\times0.3)+(5.000\\times0.5)+(1.500\\times0.2)+(5.000\\times0.2)}}\ {{+(5.000\\times0.3)+(1.000\\times0.3)+(5.000\\times0.4)}}\\end{array} * * * _**2**_ ### Category 2: Capital Goods #### Category description his category includes all upstream (i.e., cradle-to-gate) emissions from the #### production of capital goods purchased or acquired by the reporting company in the # T reporting year. Emissions from the use of capital goods by the reporting company _are accounted for in either scope 1 (e.g., for fuel use) or scope 2 (e.g., for electricity use),_ #### rather than in scope 3. Capital goods are final products that have an extended life and are used by the company to manufacture a product; provide a service; or sell, store, and deliver merchandise. In financial accounting, capital goods are treated as fixed assets or as plant, property, and equipment (PP&E). Examples of capital goods include equipment, machinery, buildings, facilities, and vehicles. In certain cases, there may be ambiguity over whether a particular purchased product is a capital good (to be reported in category 2) or a purchased good (to be reported in category 1). Companies should follow their own financial accounting procedures to determine whether to account for a purchased product as a capital good in this category or as a purchased good or service in category 1. Companies should not double count emissions between category 1 and category 2. See box 2.1 for accounting for emissions from capital goods. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[36\] * * * ## CATEGORY 2 Capital Goods ## Box \[2.1\] Accounting for emissions from capital goods In financial accounting, capital goods (sometimes called “capital assets”) are typically depreciated or amortized over the life of the asset. For purposes of accounting for scope 3 emissions, companies should not depreciate, discount, or amortize the emissions from the production of capital goods over time. Instead companies should account for the total cradle-to-gate emissions of purchased capital goods in the year of acquisition, the same way the company accounts for emissions from other purchased products in category 1. If major capital purchases occur only once every few years, scope 3 emissions from capital goods may fluctuate significantly from year to year. Companies should provide appropriate context in the public report (e.g., by highlighting exceptional or non-recurring capital investments). Source: Box 5.4 from the Scope 3 Standard # Calculating emissions from capital goods Companies may use the following methods to calculate scope 3 emissions from capital goods: ## •• Supplier-specific method, which involves collecting product-level cradle-to-gate GHG inventory data from goods suppliers **•• Hybrid method, which involves a combination of supplier-specific activity data (as available) and using secondary** data to fill the gaps. This method involves: **••** collecting allocated scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from suppliers **••** calculating upstream emissions of goods by collecting available data from suppliers on the amount of materials, fuel, electricity used, distance transported, and waste generated from the production of goods and applying appropriate emission factors **••** using secondary data to calculate upstream emissions wherever supplier-specific data is not available. **•• Average-product method, which involves estimating emissions for goods by collecting data on the mass or other** relevant units of goods purchased and multiplying by relevant secondary (e.g., industry average) emission factors (e.g., average emissions per unit of good) **•• Average spend-based method, which involves estimating emissions for goods by collecting data on the economic** value of goods purchased and multiplying by relevant secondary (e.g., industry average) emission factors (e.g., average emissions per monetary value of goods). The calculation methods for category 1 (Purchased goods and services) and category 2 (Capital goods) are the same. For guidance on calculating emissions from category 2 (Capital goods), refer to the guidance in the previous section for category 1 (Purchased goods and services). _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[37\] * * * _**3**_ ### Category 3: Fuel- and Energy-Related Activities ### Not Included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 #### Category description his category includes emissions related to the production of fuels and energy #### purchased and consumed by the reporting company in the reporting year that are # T not included in scope 1 or scope 2. Category 3 excludes emissions from the combustion of fuels or electricity consumed by the reporting company because they are already included in scope 1 or scope 2. Scope 1 includes emissions from the combustion of fuels by sources owned or controlled by the reporting company. Scope 2 includes the emissions from the combustion of fuels to generate electricity, steam, heating, and cooling purchased and consumed by the reporting company. This category includes emissions from four activities (see table 3.1). _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[38\] * * * Table \[3.1\] Activities included in category 3 (Fuel- and energy-related emissions not included in scope 1 or scope 2) | Activity | Description | Applicability | | --- | --- | --- | | A. Upstream emissions of purchased fuels | Extraction, production, and transportation of fuels consumed by the reporting companyExamples include mining of coal, refining of gasoline, transmission and distribution of natural gas, production of biofuels, etc. | Applicable to end users of fuels | | B. Upstream emissions of purchased electricity | Extraction, production, and transportation of fuels consumed in the generation of electricity, steam, heating, and cooling that is consumed by the reporting companyExamples include mining of coal, refining of fuels, extraction of natural gas, etc. | Applicable to end users of electricity, steam, heating, and cooling | | C. Transmission and distribution (T&D) losses | Generation (upstream activities and combustion) of electricity, steam, heating, and cooling that is consumed(i.e., lost)in a T&D system-reported by end user | Applicable to end users of electricity, steam, heating, and cooling | | D. Generation of purchased electricity that is sold to end users | Generation(upstream activities and combustion)of electricity,steam,heating,and coolingthatispurchasedbythereportingcompanyandsoldtoendusers-reportedbyutilitycompanyorenergyretailerNote:Thisactivityisparticularly relevantforutilitycompanies that purchase wholesale electricity suppliedbyindependentpowerproducers forresale to theircustomers. | Applicable to utility companies and energy retailers\* | Source: Table 5.5 from the Scope 3 Standard. Note: \* Energy retailers include any company selling excess power to the grid. Table 3.2 explains how each company accounts for GHG emissions. In this example, the emission factor of the electricity sold by Company B is 1 tonne (t) CO2e/MWh. All numbers are illustrative only. * * * Table \[3.2\] Accounting for emissions across an electricity value chain | Reporting company | Scope 1 | Scope 2 | Scope 3 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Coal mining, processing,and transport(Company A) | 5tCO2e | 0tCO2e(unless electricity is used during coal mining and processing) | 100tCO2efrom the combustion of sold products(i.e.,coal)Reported in category11(Use of sold products) | | Power generator(Company B) | 100tCO2e | 0tCO2e | 5tCO2efrom the extraction,production,and transportationof fuel(i.e.,coal)consumed by the reporting companyReported in Category3(Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in scope1or scope2)Note:The generator does not account for scope3 emissions associated with sold electricity because the emissions are already accounted for in scope1. | | Utility(Company C) | 0(unless SF6is released from theT&D system) | 10tCO2efrom the generation of electricity purchasedand consumedby CompanyC | 0.5tCO2efrom the extraction,production,and transportationof fuels(i.e.,coal)consumed in the generation of electricity consumed by CompanyC(5tons from coal miningx10percent of electricity generatedbyBthat is consumed byC)94.5tCO2efrom the generation(life cycle,i.e.,upstream activities and combustion)of electricity purchasedby CompanyC and sold to CompanyDBoth are reported in category3(Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in scope1or scope2) | | End consumer of electricity(Company D) | 0 | 90tCO2efrom the generation of electricity purchasedand consumedby CompanyD | 4.5tCO2efrom the extraction,production,and transportationof coal consumed in the generation of electricity consumed by CompanyD10.5tCO2efrom the generation(life cycle,i.e.,upstream activities and combustion)of electricity that is consumed(i.e.,lost)in transmission and distributionBoth are reported in category3(Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in scope1or scope2) | This activity includes the extraction, production, and transportation of fuels consumed by the reporting company. Companies may use either of the following methods to calculate scope 3 emissions from upstream emissions of purchased fuels: Calculating upstream emissions of purchased fuels (activity A of table 3.1) This activity includes the extraction, production, and transportation of fuels consumed by the reporting company. Source: Table 5.6 from the Scope 3 Standard. •• Supplier-specific method, which involves collecting data from fuel providers on upstream emissions (extraction, production and transportation) of fuel consumed by the reporting company •• Average-data method, which involves estimating emissions by using secondary (e.g., industry average) emission •• Average-data method, which involves estimating emissions by using secondary (e.g., industry average) emission factors for upstream emissions per unit of consumption (e.g., kg CO2e/kWh). * * * ## CATEGORY 3 Fuel- and Energy-Related Activities Not Included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 ## Activity data needed Companies should collect data on: **••** Quantities and types of fuel consumed. ## Emission factors needed To calculate emissions from this activity, companies should use life cycle emission factors that exclude emissions from combustion, since emissions from combustion are accounted for in scope 1 (in the case of fossil fuels) or in a separate memo item (in the case of direct CO2 emissions from combustion of biomass or biofuels). If using the supplier-specific method, companies should use fuel-provider-specific emission factors for extraction, production, and transportation of fuels per unit of fuel consumed (e.g., kg CO2e/kWh), by fuel type and country/region. If using the average-data method, companies should use average emission factors for upstream emissions per unit of consumption (e.g., kg CO2e/kWh). ## Data collection guidance Companies may obtain data by: **••** Reference to their scope 1 GHG inventory, including quantities, sources and types of fuels consumed **••** Collecting data from their fuel procurement departments **••** If necessary, collecting data from fuel suppliers **••** Reference to life cycle databases. A list of third-party databases is on the GHG Protocol website ( [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/Third-Party-Databases](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/Third-Party-Databases)). Additional databases may be added periodically, so continue to check the website. Some sources of emission factors may provide upstream emissions of purchased fuels, excluding emissions from combustion. If this is not the case, companies should determine upstream emissions from purchased fuels (excluding emissions from combustion) using the following formula. ## Calculation formula \[3.1\] Upstream emissions of purchased fuels ## Upstream CO2e emissions of purchased fuels (extraction, production, and transportation of fuels ## consumed by the reporting company) = ## sum across each fuel type consumed: ∑ (fuel consumed (e.g., kWh) × upstream fuel emission factor (kg CO2e)/kWh)) **where:** upstream fuel emission factor = life cycle emission factor – combustion emission factor. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[41\] * * * If possible, the combustion and life cycle emission factors should be from the same temporal, technical, and geographic representativeness (see table 7.6 of the Scope 3 Standard). Calculating upstream emissions of purchased electricity (activity B of table 3.1) This activity includes the extraction, production, and transportation of fuels consumed in the generation of electricity, steam, heating, and cooling that is consumed by the reporting company. Companies may use either of the following methods to calculate scope 3 emissions from upstream emissions of purchased electricity: •• Supplier-specific method, which involves collecting data from electricity providers on upstream emissions (extraction, production, and transportation) of electricity consumed by the reporting company •• Average-data method, which involves estimating emissions by using secondary (e.g., industry average) emission •• Average-data method, which involves estimating emissions by using secondary (e.g., industry average) emission factors for upstream emissions per unit of consumption (e.g., kg CO2e/kWh). Activity data needed Companies should collect data on: Companies should collect data on: •• Total quantities of electricity, steam, heating, and cooling purchased and consumed per unit of consumption (e.g., MWh), broken down by supplier, grid region, or country. Emission factors needed To calculate emissions from this activity, companies should use life cycle emission factors that exclude emissions from combustion, since emissions from combustion are accounted for in scope 2 (in the case of electricity). Companies should select an emission factor using one of the following approaches: Supplier-specific method •• Utility-specific emission factors for extraction, production and transportation of fuels consumed per MWh of electricity, steam, heating, or cooling generated. If data for the above is not available or applicable, companies should use the following approach: Average-data method •• Grid-region, country, or regional emission factors for extraction, production, and transportation of fuels per unit of consumption (e.g., kg CO2e/kWh) of electricity, steam, heating, or cooling generated. Companies should ensure that emission factors used to calculate upstream emissions of purchased electricity do not include emissions from combustion because emissions from combustion to generate electricity are accounted for in scope 2 (see figure 3.1). * * * 11. recycling bin (colours 12. shop reversed) Figure \[3.1\] Energy emission factors to use for different activities within scope 3 category 34 517. factory showing carbon 6 emissions (carbon 12. wind turbines emissions are shown in 13. chicken Combustion Combustion emission factor Use for: Scopes 1 & 2 Life cycle emission factor excluding combustion Data collection guidance Companies should disaggregate the total amount of electricity, steam, heating, or cooling purchased, by characteristics Companies should disaggregate the total amount of electricity, steam, heating, or cooling purchased, by characteristics such as supplier, grid region, or country. Energy consumption data should then be multiplied by representative emission factors (e.g., supplier or grid region) to calculate emissions. •• Reference to their scope 2 GHG inventories, including quantity and sources of electricity, steam, heat, and cooling consumption and the grid mix where the electricity was consumed •• National statistics published by government agencies •• National statistics published by government agencies •• Government agency energy management departments Data sources for emission factors include: •• Government agency energy management departments •• If necessary, energy suppliers or generators. •• If necessary, energy suppliers or generators. •• Supplier developed emission factors for life cycle of fuels •• * * * ## CATEGORY 3 Fuel- and Energy-Related Activities Not Included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 The combustion and life cycle emission factors should be from the same temporal, technical, and geographic representativeness (see table 7.6 of the Scope 3 Standard). Scope 2 includes emissions from the generation of purchased electricity, steam, heating, and cooling consumed by the reporting company. In some regions, electricity emission factors include life cycle activities related to electricity, such as transmission and distribution of electricity, or extraction, processing and transportation of fuels used to generate electricity. Non-generation activities related to electricity are accounted for in scope 3, category 3 (Fuel- and energy- related activities not included in scope 1 or scope 2), rather than in scope 2. As a result, companies should seek (and emission factor developers should provide) transparent, disaggregated electricity emission factors that allow separate accounting of emissions from electricity generation in scope 2 and non-generation activities related to electricity in scope 3. Proper accounting creates consistency in scope 2 accounting and reporting among companies and avoids double counting of the same emission within scope 2 by more than one company. See figure 7.2 in the Scope 3 Standard for more information on different types of electricity emission factors. ## Calculation formula \[3.2\] Upstream emissions of purchased electricity ## Upstream CO2e emissions of purchased electricity ## (Extraction, production, and transportation of fuels consumed in the generation of electricity, steam, ## heating, and cooling that is consumed by the reporting company) = ## sum across suppliers, regions, or countries: ∑ (electricity consumed (kWh) × upstream electricity emission factor (kgCO2e)/kWh)) + (steam consumed (kWh) × upstream steam emission factor (kg CO2e)/kWh)) + (heating consumed (kWh) × upstream heating emission factor (kg CO2e)/kWh)) + (cooling consumed (kWh) × upstream cooling emission factor (kg CO2e)/kWh)) **where:** upstream emission factor = life cycle emission factor – combustion emissions factor – T&D losses Note: T&D losses need to be subtracted only if they are included in the life cycle emission factor. Companies should check the emission factor to establish whether or not T&D losses have been taken into account. # Calculating emissions from transmission and distribution losses (activity C in table 3.1) This activity includes the lifecycle emissions of electricity, steam, heating, and cooling that is consumed (i.e., lost) in a transmission and distribution (T&D) system. Companies may use the following methods to calculate scope 3 emissions from T&D losses: **•• Supplier-specific method, which involves collecting data from electricity providers on T&D loss rates of grids where** electricity is consumed by the reporting company **•• Average-data method, which involves estimating emissions by using average T&D loss rates (e.g., national, regional,** or global averages, depending on data availability). _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[44\] * * * ## CATEGORY 3 Fuel- and Energy-Related Activities Not Included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 ## Activity data needed Companies should collect data on: **••** Electricity, steam, heating, and cooling per unit of consumption (e.g., MWh), broken down by grid region or country. ## Emission factors needed Companies should collect combustion emission factors for electricity, steam, heating, and cooling, and also use the approaches below to collect data on T&D loss rates. _**Supplier-specific method**_ **••** Utility-specific T&D loss rate (percent), specific to the grid where energy is generated and consumed. If data for the above is not available or applicable, the following approach should be used: _**Average-data method**_ **••** Country average T&D loss rate (percent) **••** Regional average T&D loss rate (percent) **••** Global average T&D loss rate (percent) ## Data Collection Guidance A World Bank database provides T&D loss rates by country ( [http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.LOSS](http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.LOSS). ZS?order=wbapi\_data\_value\_2009+wbapi\_data\_value+wbapi\_data\_value-last&sort=desc). ## Calculation formula \[3.3\] Transmission and distribution losses ## CO2e emissions from energy (generation of electricity, steam, heating, ## and cooling that is consumed (i.e., lost) in a T&D system) = ## sum across suppliers, regions, or countries: ∑ (electricity consumed (kWh) × electricity life cycle emission factor ((kg CO2e)/kWh) × T&D loss rate (%)) + (steam consumed (kWh) × steam life cycle emission factor ((kg CO2e)/kWh) × T&D loss rate (%)) + (heating consumed (kWh) × heating life cycle emission factor ((kg CO2e)/kWh) × T&D loss rate (%)) + (cooling consumed (kWh) × cooling life cycle emission factor ((kg CO2e)/kWh) × T&D loss rate (%)) _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[45\] * * * Example \[3.1\] Calculating upstream emissions of purchased electricity Company A operates data center services in 10 countries. It purchases electricity, and in some countries, district heating, to run its data centers (district heating is a centrally operated heating system that services entire cities or other large areas). It is able to collect primary data on all electricity purchased through an energy tracking system, and uses an average-data method for relevant emission factors. Note that this is an example for category 3 as a whole. As Company A does not sell purchased electricity, it does not have any emissions associated with category 3 activity D (life cycle emissions of power that is purchased and sold). | Country | Electricity purchased(kWh) | District heating purchased(kWh) | | --- | --- | --- | | Australia | 500,000 | N/A | | Canada | 600,000 | 50,000 | | India | 400,000 | N/A | | United States | 5,500,000 | N/A | | Turkey | 200,000 | N/A | Note: the activity data are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. Company A sources emission factors for extraction-, production-, and transportation-related emissions of fuels for producing electricity/heating, as well as T&D losses: | Country | Upstream emission factor of purchased electricity(kgCO2e/kWh) | Electricity/heat combustion emission factor(kgCO2e/kWh) | T&D loss rate(percent) | Upstream emission factor of purchased heating(kgCO2e/kWh) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Australia | 0.12 | 0.8(electricity) | 10(electricity) | N/A | | Canada | 0.10 | 0.4(electricity)0.15(heat) | 13(electricity)5(heat) | 0.05 | | India | 0.15 | 0.8(electricity) | 15(electricity) | N/A | | United States | 0.10 | 0.5(electricity) | 10(electricity) | N/A | | Turkey | 0.05 | 0.4(electricity) | 12(electricity) | N/A | Note: the emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. * * * ## CATEGORY 3 Fuel- and Energy-Related Activities Not Included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 ## Example \[3.1\] Calculating upstream emissions of purchased electricity (continued) ## upstream emissions from purchased electricity (category 3, activity B): = (500,000 × 0.12) + (600,000 × 0.1) + (400,000 × 0.15) + (5,500,000 × 0.1) + (200,000 × 0.05) = 740,000 kg CO2e ## life cycle emissions from transmission and distribution losses (category 3, activity C): = (500,000 × 0.8 × 0.1) + (600,000 × 0.4 × 0.13) + (50,000 × 0.15 × 0.05) + (400,000 × 0.8 × 0.15) + (5,500,000 × 0.5 × 0.1) + (200,000 × 0.4 × 0.12) = 404,175 kg CO2e ## upstream emissions from purchased heating (category 3, activity B): = 50,000 × 0.05 = 2,500 kg CO2e ## total emissions from upstream purchased electricity and heat including transmission ## and distribution losses is calculated as follows: = 740,000 + 404,175 + 2,500 = 1,146,675 kg CO2e _**Calculating life cycle emissions from power that is purchased and sold (activity D in table 3.1)**_ This activity includes the generation of electricity, steam, heating, and cooling that is purchased by the reporting company and sold to end users (reported by a utility company or energy retailer). Companies may use the following methods to calculate scope 3 emissions from power that is purchased and sold: ## •• Supplier-specific method, which involves collecting emissions data from power generators ## •• Average-data method, which involves estimating emissions by using grid average emission rates. ## Activity data needed Companies should collect data on: **••** Quantities and specific source (e.g., generation unit) of electricity purchased and re-sold. ## Emission factors needed Companies should collect data using one of the following approaches: _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[47\] * * * CATEGORY 3 Fuel- and Energy-Related Activities Not Included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 Supplier-specific method •• Specific CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions data for generation units from which purchased power is produced. \\mathsf{C O} _{_{2^{\\prime}}}\\mathsf{C H} _{_{4^{\\prime}}} N\_{2}O0 If data for the above is not available or applicable, the following approach may be used. Average-data method •• •• Grid average emission factor for the origin of purchased power. Calculation formula \[3.4\] Emissions from power that is purchased and sold CO2e emissions from power that is purchased and sold (generation of electricity, steam, heating, and cooling that is purchased by the reporting company and sold to end users (reported by utility company or energy retailer)) = sum across suppliers, regions or countries: ∑ (electricity purchased for resale (kWh) × electricity life cycle emission factor (kg CO2e)/kWh)) - (steam purchased for resale (kWh) × steam life cycle emission factor (kg CO2e)/kWh)) (\\mathrm{k g},(\\mathrm{C O}\_{2}\\mathrm{e})/(\\mathrm{K W}\\mathrm{h})) - (steam purchased for resale (kWh) × steam life cycle emission factor (kg CO2e)/kWh)) - (heating purchased for resale (kWh) × heating life cycle emission factor (kg CO2e)/kWh)) - (heating purchased for resale (kWh) × heating life cycle emission factor (kg CO2e)/kWh)) - (cooling purchased for resale (kWh) × cooling life cycle emission factor (kg CO2e)/kWh)) (k g C(\_{2}e)/k(\_N)) - (cooling purchased for resale (kWh) × cooling life cycle emission factor (kg CO2e)/kWh)) (k g C(\_{2}e)/k(\_X)) * * * _**4**_ ## Category 4: Upstream Transportation ## and Distribution ### Category description Category 4 includes emissions from: **••** Transportation and distribution of products purchased in the reporting year, between a company’s tier 1 suppliers3 and its own operations in vehicles not owned or operated by the reporting company (including multi-modal shipping where multiple carriers are involved in the delivery of a product, but excluding fuel and energy products) **••** Third-party transportation and distribution services purchased by the reporting company in the reporting year (either directly or through an intermediary), including inbound logistics, outbound logistics (e.g., of sold products), and third-party transportation and distribution between a company’s own facilities. Emissions may arise from the following transportation and distribution activities throughout the value chain: **••** Air transport **••** Rail transport **••** Road transport **••** Marine transport **••** Storage of purchased products in warehouses, distribution centers, and retail facilities. Outbound logistics services purchased by the reporting company are categorized as upstream because they are a purchased service. Emissions from transportation and distribution of purchased products upstream of the reporting company’s tier 1 suppliers (e.g., transportation between a company’s tier 2 and tier 1 suppliers) are accounted for in scope 3, category 1 (Purchased goods and services). Table 4.1 shows the scope and category of emissions where each type of transportation and distribution activity should be accounted for. Tier 1 suppliers are companies with which the reporting company has a purchase order for goods or services (e.g., materials, parts, components, etc.). Tier 2 suppliers are companies with which tier 1 suppliers have a purchase order for goods and services (see figure 7.3 in the Scope 3 Standard). _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[49\] * * * A reporting company’s scope 3 emissions from upstream transportation and distribution include the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of third-party transportation companies (allocated to the reporting company). Table \[4.1\] Accounting for emissions from transportation and distribution activities in the value chain | Transportation and distribution activity in the value chain | Scope and category of emissions | | --- | --- | | Transportation and distribution in vehicles and facilities owned or controlled by the reporting company | Scope 1(for fuel use)or scope2(for electricity use) | | Transportation and distribution in vehicles and facilities leased by and operated by the reporting company(and not already included in scope1 or scope2) | Scope3,category8(Upstream leased assets) | | Transportation and distribution of purchased products, upstream of the reporting company's tier1 suppliers(e.g.,transportation between a company's tier2 and tier1 suppliers) | Scope3,category1(Purchased goods and services),since emissions from transportation are already included in the cradle-to-gate emissions of purchased products.These emissions are not required to be reported separately from category1. | | Production of vehicles(e.g.,ships,trucks,planes)purchased or acquired by the reporting company | Account for the upstream(i.e.,cradle-to-gate)emissions associated with manufacturing vehicles in Scope3,category2(Capital goods) | | Transportation of fuels and energy consumed by the reporting company | Scope3,category3(Fuel- and energy-related emissions not included in scope1 or scope2) | | Transportation and distribution of products purchased by the reporting company,between a company's tier1 suppliersand its own operations(in vehicles and facilities not owned or controlled by the reporting company) | Scope3,category4(Upstream transportation and distribution) | | Transportation and distribution services purchased by the reporting companyin the reporting year(either directly or through an intermediary),including inbound logistics,outbound logistics(e.g.,of sold products),and transportation and distribution between a company's own facilities(in vehicles and facilities not owned or controlled by the reporting company) | Scope3,category9(Downstream transportation and distribution) | Calculating emissions from transportation Source: Table 5.7 from the Scope 3 Standard. Companies may use the following methods to calculate scope 3 emissions from transportation: * * * •• Fuel-based method, which involves determining the amount of fuel consumed (i.e., scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of transport providers) and applying the appropriate emission factor for that fuel •• •• Distance-based method, which involves determining the mass, distance, and mode of each shipment, then applying the appropriate mass-distance emission factor for the vehicle used •• Spend-based method, which involves determining the amount of money spent on each mode of business travel •• Spend-based method, which involves determining the amount of money spent on each mode of business travel transport and applying secondary (EEIO) emission factors. The GHG Protocol has a calculation tool for transportation that uses a combination of the fuel-based and distancebased methods. This combination is used because CO2 is better estimated from fuel use, and CH4 and N2O are better estimated from distance travelled. The tool uses fuel-efficiency ratios to convert either type of activity data (fuel or distance) supplied by the user into either fuel or distance depending on the GHG being calculated. The calculation tool (“GHG emissions from transport or mobile sources”) is available at the GHG Protocol website: [http://www.ghgprotocol](http://www.ghgprotocol/). org/calculation-tools/all-tools). \\mathrm{C O}\_{2} \ {mathrm C H H}\_{4} N\_{2}O0 It is important to note that the calculation tool was originally developed to calculate an organization’s scope 1 emissions (i.e., emissions from vehicles that the organization owns and operates). Therefore, the emission factors that prepopulate the calculation tool are combustion emission factors. When calculating emissions from transportation in scope 3, companies should use life cycle emission factors (see “Energy emission factors in scope 3 accounting” in the It is important to note that the calculation tool was originally developed to calculate an organization’s scope 1 emissions (i.e., emissions from vehicles that the organization owns and operates). Therefore, the emission factors that prepopulate the calculation tool are combustion emission factors. When calculating emissions from transportation in scope 3, companies should use life cycle emission factors (see “Energy emission factors in scope 3 accounting” in the scope 3, companies should use life cycle emission factors (see “Energy emission factors in scope 3 accounting” in the Introduction for more information on which emission factors to use). If using the GHG Protocol transport calculation Introduction for more information on which emission factors to use). If using the GHG Protocol transport calculation tool to calculate scope 3 emissions, companies should customize the tool by entering life cycle emission factors. Introduction for more information on which emission factors to use). If using the GHG Protocol transport calculation tool to calculate scope 3 emissions, companies should customize the tool by entering life cycle emission factors. Figure \[4.1\] Decision tree for selecting a calculation method for emissions from upstream transportation * * * ## CATEGORY 4 Upstream Transportation and Distribution ## Fuel-based method (transportation) The fuel-based method should be used when companies can obtain data for fuel use from transport providers (and, if applicable, refrigerant leakage due to refrigeration of products) from vehicle fleets (e.g., trucks, trains, planes, vessels). Companies should also take into account any additional energy used and account for fugitive emissions (e.g., refrigerant loss or air-conditioning). Companies may optionally calculate any emissions from unladen backhaul (i.e., the return journey of the empty vehicle). Where fuel use data is unavailable, the company may derive fuel use by using the: **••** Amount spent on fuels and the average price of fuels **••** Distance travelled and the vehicle’s fuel efficiency **••** Amount spent on transportation services, fuel cost share (as percent of total cost of transportation services) and the average price of fuels. For calculating CO2, the fuel-based method is more accurate than the distance-based method because fuel consumption is directly related to emissions. The fuel-based method is best applied if the vehicle exclusively ships the reporting company’s purchased goods (i.e., exclusive use or truckload shipping, rather than less-than-truckload (LTL) shipping). Otherwise, emissions should be allocated between goods shipped for the reporting company and goods shipped for other companies. See chapter 8 of the Scope 3 Standard for further guidance on allocating emissions. Companies should allocate emissions based on the following default limiting factors for each transportation mode, unless more accurate data is available to show that another factor is the limiting factor: **•• Road transport: Truck capacity is typically limited by mass, so mass-based allocation should be used** **•• Marine transport: Vessel capacity is typically limited by volume, so volume-based allocation should be used** **•• Air transport: Aircraft capacity is typically limited by mass, so mass-based allocation should be used** **•• Rail transport: Rail capacity is typically limited by mass, so mass-based allocation should be used.** If there are multiple shipments on a transport leg, distance should also be used as a means for allocation. (For more information, see the Deutsche Post DHL example in this section.) If data required for allocation is not available or reliable due to the variety of goods transported in one vehicle at the same time, the distance-based method should be used to calculate scope 3 emissions. ## Activity data needed Companies should collect data on: **••** Quantities of fuel (e.g., diesel, gasoline, jet fuel, biofuels) consumed **••** Amount spent on fuels **••** Quantities of fugitive emissions (e.g., from air conditioning and refrigeration). ## If applicable: **••** Distance travelled **••** Average fuel efficiency of the vehicle, expressed in units of liters of fuel consumed per tonne per kilometer transported **••** Cost of fuels **••** Volume and/or mass of purchased goods in the vehicle **••** Information on whether the products are refrigerated in transport. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[52\] * * * Emission factors needed Companies should collect: •• Fuel emission factors, expressed in units of emissions per unit of energy consumed (e.g., kg CO2e/liters, CO2e/Btu) •• For electric vehicles (if applicable), electricity emission factors, expressed in units of emissions per unit of electricity •• For electric vehicles (if applicable), electricity emission factors, expressed in units of emissions per unit of electricity consumed (e.g., kg CO2e/kWh) •• C O\_{2}e/K W\_ •• Fugitive emission factors, expressed in units of emissions per unit (e.g., kg CO2e/kg refrigerant leakage) \\mathrm{C O}\_{2}mathrm e Emission factors should at a minimum include emissions from fuel combustion, and should, where possible, include cradle-to-gate emissions of the fuel (i.e., from extraction, processing, and transportation to the point of use). Note: For air travel emission factors, multipliers or other corrections to account for radiative forcing may be applied to the GWP of emissions arising from aircraft transport. If applied, companies should disclose the specific factor used. Data collection guidance •• Aggregated fuel receipts •• •• Purchase records (provided by transportation providers) •• •• Internal transport management systems. Data sources for emission factors include: •• Transportation carriers •• Government agencies (e.g., Defra provides emission factors for the United Kingdom) •• Government agencies (e.g., Defra provides emission factors for the United Kingdom) •• •• The GHG Protocol website ( [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools) and [http://www.ghgprotocol](http://www.ghgprotocol/). org/standards/scope-3-standard) •• Industry associations •• Industry associations •• Additional sources in table 4.2. •• Additional sources in table 4.2. * * * Transportation emissions are calculated by multiplying each fuel/refrigerant type used by a corresponding emission factor and summing the results as shown in the formula below: Calculation formula \[4.1\] Fuel-based method (transportation) If fuel consumption data is unavailable, companies may use formula 4.2 and/or formula 4.3 to calculate quantities of fuel consumed. Calculation formula \[4.2\] Calculating fuel use from fuel spend Quantities of fuel consumed (liters) = Calculation formula \[4.3\] Calculating fuel use from distance travelled Quantities of fuel consumed (liters) = total fuel spend (e.g., $) ∑ ( ) average fuel price (e.g., $/liter) If allocation is needed, companies should calculate the allocated fuel use (for the goods shipped by the reporting company) using the formula below, then apply formula 4.1 above. * * * ## CATEGORY 4 Upstream Transportation and Distribution ## Calculation formula \[4.4\] Allocating fuel use ## Allocated fuel use = mass/volume of company’s goods = total fuel consumed (liters) x( ) mass/volume of goods transported Companies may optionally substitute mass of goods by volume with dimensional mass or chargeable mass where data is available to prove that the alternative method is more suitable. Dimensional mass is a calculated mass that takes into account packaging volume as well as the actual mass of the goods. Chargeable mass is the higher value of either the actual or the dimensional mass of the goods. Companies may optionally calculate emissions from unladen backhaul (i.e., the return journey of the empty vehicle) using the following formula: ## Calculation formula \[4.5\] Calculating emissions from unladen backhaul ## CO2e emissions from unladen backhaul = ## for each fuel type: ∑ (quantity of fuel consumed from backhaul × emission factor for the fuel (e.g., kg CO2e/liter)) **where:** quantity of fuel consumed from backhaul = average efficiency of vehicles unladed (l/km) × total distance travelled unladen. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[55\] * * * Example \[4.1\] Calculating emissions from upstream transportation using the fuel-based method Company A makes bread in Italy. Suppliers B, C, and D supply refrigerated raw materials for Company A’s operations. Company A collects activity data from its suppliers on the amount of fuel used and refrigerant leakage incurred by the transport of raw materials to Company A’s facility. All trucks transport goods exclusively for Company A. Company A collects emission factors for the fuel type used by suppliers and for refrigerant leakage. The situation is summarized in the table below: | Supplier | Fuel consumed(liters) or refrigerant leakage(kg) | Fuel/refrigerant type | Emission factor(kgCO2e/liter for fuels;Global warming potential for refrigerants) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | B | 50,000 | Diesel | 3 | | C | 80,000 | Diesel | 3 | | D | 90,000 | Diesel | 3 | | D | 50 | RefrigerantR410a | 2,000 | Note: The activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not represent actual data. emissions from diesel is calculated as: \\begin{array}{r}{\\mathbb{\\Sigma}\\left(\\mathtt{Q U a n t i t y\ o f\ f u e l\ c o n s u m e d\ (l i i r e s)}\\times\\mathtt{e m i s t l o n\ f a c t o r\ f o r\ t h e e\ l i u e\ (\\mathtt{l e}O\_{mathtt}/1mathtt t{l e t})}\\right)}\ {=(50,000\\times3)+(80,000\\times3)+(90,000\\times3)=660,000,\\mathtt{k g\ \ Z C{e2}}}\\end{array} emissions from refrigerant leakage is calculated as: ∑ (quantity of refrigerant leakage (kg) × emission factor for refrigerant (kg CO2e/kg)) = 50 × 2,000 = 100,000 kg CO2e =50\\times2.000=100.000k0o(c o\_{2}e total emissions is calculated as follows: emissions from fuels + emissions from refrigerant leakage = 660,000 + 100,000 = 760,000 kg CO2e * * * Distance-based method (transportation) In this method, distance is multiplied by mass or volume of goods transported and relevant emission factors that incorporate average fuel consumption, average utilization, average size and mass or volume of the goods and the vehicles, and their associated GHG emissions. Emission factors for this method are typically represented in grams or kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent per tonne-kilometer or TEU-kilometer. Tonne-kilometer is a unit of measure representing one tonne of goods transported over 1 kilometer. TEU-kilometer is a unit of measure representing one twenty-foot container equivalent of goods transported over 1 kilometer. The distance-based method is especially useful for an organization that does not have access to fuel or mileage records from the transport vehicles, or has shipments smaller than those that would consume an entire vehicle or vessel. If sub-contractor fuel data cannot be easily obtained in order to use the fuel-based method, then the distance-based method should be used. Distance can be tracked using internal management systems or, if these are unavailable, online maps. However, accuracy is generally lower than the fuel-based method as assumptions are made about the average fuel consumption, mass or volume of goods, and loading of vehicles. Activity data needed Companies should collect data on the distance travelled by transportation suppliers. This data may be obtained by: Companies should collect data on the distance travelled by transportation suppliers. This data may be obtained by: •• Mass or volume of the products sold •• •• Actual distances provided by transportation supplier (if actual distance is unavailable, companies may use the shortest theoretical distance) •• Online maps or calculators •• Online maps or calculators •• Published port-to-port travel distances. The actual distances should be used when available, and each leg of the transportation supply chain should be collected separately. Emission factors needed •• Emission factor by mode of transport (e.g., rail, air, road) or vehicle types (e.g., articulated lorry, container vessel), expressed in units of greenhouse gas (CO2, CH4, N2O, or CO2e) per unit of mass (e.g., tonne) or volume (e.g., TEU) travelled (e.g., kilometer). Companies should collect: Common forms of emission factors are kg CO2e/tonne/km for road transport or kg CO2e/TEU/km for sea transport. (\\mathsf{C O} _{_ ^{2^{\\prime}}}\\mathsf{C H}\_{ _4^{\\prime}}\\mathsf{N}_{ _2}\\mathsf{O}_{\_1} \\mathrm{C O}\_{2}\\mathrm{e}) Note: For air travel emission factors, multipliers or other corrections to account for radiative forcing may be applied to the GWP of emissions arising from aircraft transport. If applied, companies should disclose the specific factor used. * * * Data collection guidance Companies may obtain activity data from: •• Purchase orders •• •• Specific carrier or mode operator •• Internal management systems •• Internal management systems •• •• Industry associations •• •• Online maps and calculators. Companies may obtain emission factors from: •• Transportation carriers •• Government agencies (e.g., Defra provides emission factors for the United Kingdom) •• The GHG Protocol website ( [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools) and [http://www.ghgprotocol](http://www.ghgprotocol/). •• The GHG Protocol website ( [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools) and [http://www.ghgprotocol](http://www.ghgprotocol/). org/standards/scope-3-standard) •• Industry associations •• Industry associations •• •• Additional sources in table 4.2. When collecting emission factors, it is important to note that they may be vehicle, regional, or country specific. Calculation resources include: •• GHG Protocol Calculation Tool, “Mobile Combustion GHG Emissions Calculation Tool. Version 2.0. June 2009,” developed by World Resources Institute, available at [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools). •• U.S. EPA Climate Leaders GHG Inventory Protocol, “Optional Emissions from Commuting, Business Travel and •• U.S. EPA Climate Leaders GHG Inventory Protocol, “Optional Emissions from Commuting, Business Travel and Product Transport,” available at: [http://www.epa.gov/stateply/documents/resources/commute\_travel\_product.pdf](http://www.epa.gov/stateply/documents/resources/commute_travel_product.pdf) •• UK Defra, “Guidance on Measuring and Reporting GHG Emissions from Freight Transport Operations,” available at •• UK Defra, “Guidance on Measuring and Reporting GHG Emissions from Freight Transport Operations,” available at [http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/economy/business-efficiency/reporting/](http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/economy/business-efficiency/reporting/) •• UK Defra GHG Conversion Factors, developed by the United Kingdom Department of Environment, Food and Rural •• UK Defra GHG Conversion Factors, developed by the United Kingdom Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), available at [http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/economy/business-efficiency/reporting/](http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/economy/business-efficiency/reporting/) * * * Table \[4.2\] Data collection guidance for the distance-based method | Mode | Vehicle | Unit | Primary data sources | Secondary data sources | Comments | Assumptions | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | air | Freighter short-haul | kg CO2e/t-km | Carrier | ICAO UK Defra Environmental reports of air carriers LCA databases EEIO databases | Carrier can providea) shipment specific emissionsb) trade-line emissions based on existing network design and historical plane consumptionc) emissions per type of plane | | | Freighter long-haul | kg CO2e/t-km | | | | | | | Belly-freight short-haul | kg CO2e/t-km | | | | | | | Belly-freight long-haul | kg CO2e/t-km | | | | | | | Passenger plane short-haul | kg CO2e/t-km | | | | | | | Passenger plane long-haul | kg CO2e/t-km | | | | | | | Ship | Container vessel<2000 TEU | kg CO2e/TEU-km | Carrier | IMO CCWG LCA databases EEIO databases | Carrier can providea) shipment specific emissionsb) trade-line emissions based on existing network design and historical vessel consumptionc) emissions per type of vessel | Default 1 TEU=10t | | Container vessel 2000-5000 TEU | kg CO2e/TEU-km | | | | | | | Container vessel 5000-8000 TEU | kg CO2e/TEU-km | | | | | | | Container vessel>8000TEU | kg CO2e/TEU-km | | | | | | | Bulk vessel<20000 dwt | kg CO2e/t-km | | | | | | | Bulk vessel>20000 dwt | kg CO2e/t-km | | | | | | \ {sf k}\\mathrm{G O}\_{2}/{mathrm L}-\\mathrm{k} k g C O,e/L,K m k g C O\_{2}e/E\\cdot K O {sf k k}}\ {\\sf C{}}\_{2},\\mathrm{e}/\\mathrm{L}-\\mathrm{{k}m} k g C O\_{2}e/E-K m \ {sf k} _\\mathrm{G O}_{2}/{\\sf t}-{\\sf k}\_{\\mathrm{H}} k g,C O\_{2}e/T E U-K m \ {sf k}\\mathrm{e O}\_{2}{/\\sf{e//k m}} k g\\subset\_{2}e/L-k m * * * Table \[4.2\] Data collection guidance for the distance-based method (continued) | Mode | Vehicle | Unit | Primary data sources | Secondary data sources | Comments | Assumptions | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rail | Electric | kg CO2e/t-km | Operator | EcoTransIT LCA databases EEIO databases | Operator can provide shipment specific emissions on trade-line historical emissions | | | Diesel | kg CO2e/t-km | | | | | | | Truck | Van<3.5t | kg CO2e/t-km | Operator | EcoTransIT NTM TREMOVE(EU) EPA Smart Way(US) Handbook Emission Factors for Road Transport(HBEFA)LCA databases EEIO databases | Trucker can providea) shipment specific emissionsb) trade-line emissions based on existing network design and historical fleet consumptionc) emissions per type of truck | Default1TEU=10t | | Truck 3.5-7.5t | kg CO2e/t-km | | | | | | | Truck 7.5t-16t | kg CO2e/t-km | | | | | | | Truck 16t-32t single axle | kg CO2e/t-kmkg CO2e/TEU-km | | | | | | | Truck>32t tractor and trailer or flatbed | kg CO2e/t-kmkg CO2e/TEU-km | | | | | | | Warehouse | Dry warehouse | kg CO2e/pallet-daykg CO2e/TEU-daykg CO2e/cbm-daykg CO2e/kg-day | Operator | LCA databases EEIO databases | Operator may also have the emission factor based on the warehouse surface | 1 pallet=1 square meter of floor space | | Refrigerated warehouse | kg CO2e/pallet-daykg CO2e/TEU-daykg CO2e/cbm-daykg CO2e/kg-day | | | | | | | Terminal | Terminal | kg CO2e/t/kg CO2e/TEU | Terminal owner | LCA databases EEIO databases | | 1 TEU=10t | k g C O\_{2}e/E-K O\ k g\ C\_{2}e/L-k m \ {sf k q q}} _{2}{\\sf e//\ \\sf K//}_{\ }^{\ k\_99,\_O{2}e/L-k m k g C O\_{2}e//U E U k/ ICAO = International Civil Aviation Organization C O\_{z2}e a l/ \ {sf C C O}\_{2}/{\\sf{T E U}},{\\sf{d a y}} \\mathsf{C O}\_{2}\\mathsf{e}/\\mathsf{C b m}.cdot Notes: k g C O\_{2}e/D a l \ {sf C}O\_{}/{\\sf T E U\ d d a y} Source: Carbon Trust IMO = International Maritime Organization k g/C\_{2}e/k g-d a y k g,{O}\_{2}e/k g,a y \ {sf C C O}/b! \ C\_{2}/\ U k g(C,,,,) CCWG = Clean Cargo Working Group TEU = twenty-foot equivalent units, a measure of the size of shipping containers. One standard-size container is 1 TEU. * * * ## CATEGORY 4 Upstream Transportation and Distribution To calculate emissions, companies should multiply the quantity of goods purchased in mass (including packaging and pallets) or volume by the distance travelled in the transport leg and then multiply that by an emission factor specific to the transport leg (usually a transport mode- or vehicle type- specific emission factor). Because each transport mode or vehicle type has a different emission factor, the transport legs should be calculated separately and total emissions aggregated. The following formula can be applied to all modes of transport and/or vehicle types to calculate emissions from transportation: ## Calculation formula \[4.6\] Distance-based method (transportation) ## CO2e emissions from transportation = ## sum across transport modes and/or vehicle types: = ∑ (mass of goods purchased (tonnes or volume ) × distance travelled in transport leg (km) × emission factor of transport mode or vehicle type (kg CO2e/tonne or volume/km)) _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[61\] * * * Example \[4.2\] Calculating emissions from upstream transportation using the distance-based method Company A makes chairs and sources basic materials from Suppliers B, C, and D. Company A calculates total distance from the transport of the basic goods and obtains information from suppliers on vehicle type used for transport. Company A obtains relevant emission factors from lifecycle databases. The information is summarized below: | Supplier | Mass of transported goods(tonnes) | Distance transported(km) | Transport mode or vehicle type | Emission factor(kgCO2e/TEU-km) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | B | 2 | 2000 | Truck(rigid，＞3.5-7.5t) | 0.2 | | C | 1 | 3000 | Air(long haul) | 1.0 | | D | 6 | 4000 | Container2000-2999TEU | 0.05 | Note: the activity data and emission factors in this example are for illustrative purposes only. Emissions from road transport: = ∑ (mass of goods purchased (tonnes) × distance travelled in transport leg × emission factor of transport mode or vehicle type (kg CO2e/tonne-km)) = 2 × 2,000 × 0.2 = 800 kg CO2e =2\\times2,000\\times0.2 =800k g O\_{2}e emissions from air transport: = ∑ (quantity of goods purchased (tonnes) x distance travelled in transport leg = ∑ (quantity of goods purchased (tonnes) x distance travelled in transport leg x emission factor of transport mode or vehicle type (kg CO2e/tonne-km)) = 1 × 3,000 × 1 = 3,000 kg CO2e =1\\times3,000\\times1 =3.000k g O\_{2}e emissions from sea transport: = ∑ (quantity of goods purchased (tonnes) x distance travelled in transport leg x emission factor of transport mode or vehicle type (kg CO2e/tonne-km)) = 6 × 4,000 × 0.05 total emissions form transport (upstream) is calculated as: = emissions from road transport + emissions from air transport + emissions from sea transport = 800 + 3,000 + 1,200 = 5,000 kg CO2e =6\\times4.000\\times0.05 =800+3.000+1.200 * * * 7. factory 8. lorry Example \[4.3\] Allocating emissions from transportation (Deutsche Post DHL) 9. cloud 3 9. recycling bin 10. recycling bin (colours 11. wind turbines 12. chicken Shipment 2 14. cow 1 13. cow 2 14. shopOrigin: B 15. factory showing carbon emissions (carbon Destination: C emissions are shown in orange) Weight 10 t Deutsche Post DHL, a global mail and logistics company, set a CO 10 2 efficiency target. The choice of appropriate allocation 14 factors is a critical decision point to ensure fair allocation of emissions. The following example demonstrates a typical situation, in which different allocation factors may lead to completely different results. \\mathrm{C O}\_{2} This example is about a typical delivery run where a truck needs to stop at different locations to pick up or drop off 13 shipments. In this example, 24-tonne shipment 1 needs to be transported from a home station (A) to a customer (B). At 17 customer (B), shipment 1 is unloaded and shipments 2 and 3 are picked up. Shipment 2 is addressed to customer (C) and shipment 3 needs to be transported back to the home station (A). Data were not available on the type and quantity of fuel consumed during transportation, but data on the mass, 16 distance, and mode of shipment was available. Therefore the distance-based method was used. It was calculated that 31.5 kg CO2 was emitted during this delivery run. How can we allocate these emissions to the shipments? I. Allocation using driven-tonne kilometers | | Shipment1 | Shipment2 | Shipment3 | Total | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Driven tkm | 240 tkm | 150 tkm | 250 tkm | 640 tkm | | Total emissions | | | | 31.5kgCO2 | | Allocation factor | | | | 0.049kgCO2per tkm | | Shipment emissions | 11.8kgCO2 | 7.4kgCO2 | 12.3kgCO2 | 31.5kgCO2 | One option for allocation is to use driven-tonne kilometers (tkm) as an allocation factor. For calculating the tonnekilometers, the weight of each shipment is multiplied by the distance driven. Then the total amount of CO2 emissions is allocated to the shipments on the basis of their share in the driven tonne- kilometers. 11.8k! 7.4\\mathrm{k g},\\mathrm{C O}\_{2} 12.3k q O\_{2} Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions * * * Example \[4.3\] Allocating emissions from transportation (Deutsche Post DHL) (continued) Surprisingly, shipment 2, which causes the longest transportation leg (15 km), receives minimum emissions and shipment 3 is “punished” for being transported jointly with shipment 2 via customer (C). The next option shows how such downsides can be mitigated. II. Allocation using shortest theoretical distance The second option aims at allocating CO2 emissions using the shortest theoretical distance between the origin and destination of each shipment (also known as the Great Circle Distance) as an allocation factor. The shipments’ CO2 allocation is independent from the actual driven distance because that is of no relevance to the customer. As in the example above, tonne-kilometers are calculated – this time using the shortest theoretical distance between a shipment’s origin and destination – before performing the allocation. \\mathrm{C O}\_{2} \\mathrm{C O}\_{2} | | Shipment1 | Shipment2 | Shipment3 | Total | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Tkm based on GCD | 240 tkm | 150 tkm | 100 tkm | 490 tkm | | Total emissions | | | | 31.5kgCO2 | | Allocation factor | | | | 0.064kgCO2per tkm | | Shipment emissions | 15.43kgCO2 | 9.64kgCO2 | 6.43kgCO2 | 31.5kgCO2 | 31.5k q O\_{2} \\mathrm{C O}\_{2} 15.43k g/0 9.64k g\ \ \_{2} 6.43k g O\_{2} 31.5,\\mathrm{k g\ \\text{C O}}\_{2} Because the allocation of emissions for individual items is based only on the characteristics of the individual shipments, this option provides a fair allocation method. Although there are many more options to perform the allocation to shipments in freight transport, this example illustrates pitfalls a user can encounter by picking an allocation factor. * * * ## CATEGORY 4 Upstream Transportation and Distribution ## Spend-based method If the fuel-based method and distance method cannot be applied (e.g., due to data limitations), companies should apply the spend-based method to calculate the emissions from transportation. In this method, the amount spent on transportation by type is multiplied by the relevant EEIO emission factors. Refer to “Environmentally-extended input output (EEIO) data” in the Introduction for guidance on EEIO data. Companies may determine the amount spent on transportation through bills, invoice payments, or financial accounting systems. The spend-based method is effective for screening purposes; however it has high levels of uncertainty and the fuel-based and distance-based methods are recommended for accounting for transportation emissions. ## Activity data needed **••** Amount spent on transportation by type (e.g. road, rail, air, barge), using market values (e.g., dollars). ## Emission factors needed **••** Cradle-to-gate emission factors of the transportation type per unit of economic value (e.g., kg CO2e/$) **••** Where applicable, inflation data to convert market values between the year of the EEIO emissions factors and the year of the activity data. ## Data collection guidance Data sources for activity data include: **••** Internal data systems (e.g., financial accounting systems) **••** Bills **••** Invoices. ## Data sources for emission factors include: **••** Environmentally-extended input-output (EEIO) databases. A list of EEIO databases is provided on the GHG Protocol website ( [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/Third-Party-Databases](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/Third-Party-Databases)). Additional databases may be added periodically, so continue to check the website. ## Calculation formula \[4.7\] Spend-based method (transportation) ## CO2e emissions from transportation = ## sum across transport modes and/or vehicle types: ∑ (amount spent on transportation by type ($) × relevant EEIO emission factors per unit of economic value (kg CO2e/$)) _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[65\] * * * Example \[4.4\] Calculating emissions from transportation by using the spend-based method Company A makes televisions and sources basic materials from suppliers B, C, and D. Company A calculates total amount spent from the transport of the basic goods and obtains information from suppliers on vehicle type used for transport. Company A obtains relevant emission factors from EEIO databases. The information is summarized in the table below: | Supplier | Amount spent ($) | Transport mode or vehicle type | EEIO emission factor(kgCO2e/$) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | B | 20,000 | Truck(rigid，＞3.5-7.5t) | 0.04 | | C | 30,000 | Air(long haul) | 0.15 | | D | 40,000 | Container2,000-2,999TEU | 0.05 | Note: the activity data and emission factors in this example are for illustrative purposes only. emissions from road transport: = ∑ (amount spent on transportation leg × EEIO emission factor of transport mode or vehicle type (kg CO2e/$)) = 20,000 × 0.04 = 800 kg CO2e/$ emissions from air transport: = ∑ (amount spent on transportation leg × EEIO emission factor of transport mode or vehicle type (kg CO2e/$)) = 30,000 × 0.15 = 4,500 kg CO2e/$ emissions from sea transport: = ∑ (amount spent on transport leg × EEIO emission factor of transport mode or vehicle type (kg CO2e/$)) = 40,000 × 0.05 = 2,000 kg CO2e/$ Companies may use either of two methods to calculate scope 3 emissions from upstream distribution (e.g. storage facilities): \\begin{array}{c}{{\\times\\mathbb{E E I O\ e r n i s s i o n\ f a a c t o r,f,r a n s p o r t,r o o e,o r,v e h i c l e,t y p e,(k g,\\mathrm{C O} _{2}e/))}}}\ {{=40,000\\times0.05=2,000\\times2,000,,,000,\\mathrm{K G}_{2}e/}}\\end{array} •• Site-specific method, which involves site-specific fuel, electricity, and fugitive emissions data and applying the appropriate emission factors •• Average-data method, which involves estimating emissions for each distribution activity, based on average data total emissions from transport (upstream) is calculated as: = emissions from road transport + emissions from air transport + emissions from sea transport = 800 + 4,500 + 2,000 = 7,300 kg CO2e/$ •• Average-data method, which involves estimating emissions for each distribution activity, based on average data (such as average emissions per pallet or cubic meter stored per day). * * * Figure 4.2 gives a decision tree for selecting a calculation method for emissions from upstream distribution. Figure \[4.2\] Decision tree for selecting a calculation method for emissions from upstream distribution Site-specific method This method involves collecting site-specific fuel and energy data from the storage facility (e.g., warehouses, distribution centres) of individual distribution activities, and multiplying them by appropriate emission factors. If the storage facility stores goods for companies other than the reporting company, emissions should be allocated to the reporting company. For more information on allocation, see chapter 8 of the Scope 3 Standard. Companies should collect data on: •• Site-specific fuel and electricity use •• Site-specific fugitive emissions (e.g., air conditioning or refrigerant leakage) •• Site-specific fugitive emissions (e.g., air conditioning or refrigerant leakage) •• The average occupancy rate of the storage facility (i.e., average total volume of goods stored). \ mathtt\ (e(.mathtt9.)), •• The average occupancy rate of the storage facility (i.e., average total volume of goods stored). •• Site or regionally specific emission factors for energy sources (e.g., electricity and fuels) per unit of consumption (e.g., kg CO2e/kWh for electricity, kg CO2e/liter for diesel) •• Emission factors of fugitive and process emissions (kg CO2e/kg). Companies should collect: •• Emission factors of fugitive and process emissions (kg CO2e/kg). \ {sf C O O} _{2}{\\sf}{\\sf E}/{\\sf K}_ * * * ## CATEGORY 4 Upstream Transportation and Distribution ## Data collection guidance Data sources for activity data include: **••** Utility bills **••** Purchase records **••** Meter readings **••** Internal IT systems. Data sources for emission factors include: **••** Life cycle databases **••** Company-developed emission factors **••** Industry associations. ## Calculation formula \[4.8\] Site-specific method (distribution) ## CO2e emissions from distribution = ## for each storage facility: emissions of storage facility (kg CO2e) = (fuel consumed (kWh) × fuel emission factor (kg CO2e/kWh)) + (electricity consumed (kWh) × electricity emission factor (kg CO2e)/kWh) + (refrigerant leakage (kg) × refrigerant emission factor (kg CO2e)/kg)) ## then, allocate emissions based on volume that company’s products take within storage facility: volume of reporting company’s purchased goods (m3) allocated emissions of storage facility = (3) total volume of goods in storage facility (m) × emissions of storage facility (kg CO2e) ## finally, sum across all storage facilities: ∑ allocated emissions of storage facility If data are available, companies may optionally allocate emissions based on different storage methods (e.g., temperature-controlled storage and ambient storage). This allocation step can be significant within shared storage. Companies may optionally allocate emissions based on length of time goods spend in storage. If a company has a large number of distribution channels, sampling may be appropriate (see Appendix A for more information). _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[68\] * * * Example \[4.5\] Calculating emissions from upstream distribution using the site-specific method Company A’s products are stored at two facilities throughout the reporting year. No chilling or freezing is needed during storage. Company A collects the data from operators on the amount of fuel and electricity consumed for the reporting year, as well as the volume of company A’s purchased goods compared to total volume of goods. Company A collects corresponding emission factors from life cycle databases. The information is summarized in the table below: | Storage facility | Electricity consumed(kWh) | Electricity emission factor(kgCO2e/kWh) | Natural gas used(kWh) | Natural gas emission factor(kgCO2e/kWh) | Volume of companyA's goods(m3) | Total volume of goods in storagefacility(m3) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | 10,000 | 0.8 | 1,000 | 0.25 | 100 | 400 | | 2 | 15,000 | 0.8 | 2,000 | 0.25 | 200 | 800 | (textcircled{1} Note: the activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. emissions from storage facility 1 are calculated as: \\begin{array}{c}{{\\mathsf{e m i s s i o n s ~~f o o m~~ s s o t o r a g e f a f a c i l i t y ~~1~~ a r e ~~c a l u c l a d e~~}mathsf a}}\ {{(\\mathsf{f}\\mathsf{f l l e}\\mathsf{f{o l l u g e d d ~~(\\mathsf{K}\\mathsf{h})}})\ \ times mathsf f f f\ \\mathsf{e r l l f e f t s f y o o o f~~a c a o o f~~(\\mathsf{K}\\mathsf{G}\ \ \\mathsf{f})//\\mathsf{K l}mathsf h}})}\ {{(\\mathsf{e l s t t t i l l y y c\ o f l u t ~~mathsf f e e t t i l y~~ mathsf f l l e~t\\mathsf{K l l t t e}e}\ (mathsf K mathsfmathsf\ G\\mathsf{f}\\mathsf mathsf f Gmathsf\\mathsf{\ f f{l l l}}}))\ {{\ times}}\ {{\\timestimes}}\\leftleft{(\ \ {frac\\\ \\\ \ emissions from storage facility 2 are calculated as: \\begin{array}{c}{{ ((fuel consumed (kWh) × fuel emission factor (kg CO2e)/kWh)) - (electricity consumed (kWh) × electricity emission factor (kg CO2e)/kWh)) * * * ## CATEGORY 4 Upstream Transportation and Distribution ## Average-data method Companies should use the average-data method where supply-chain specific data is unavailable. Companies should collect average emission factors for distribution activities. ## Activity data needed Companies should collect data based on throughput: **••** Volume of purchased goods that are stored (e.g., square meters, cubic meters, pallet, TEU) or number of pallets needed to store purchased goods **••** Average number of days that goods are stored. ## Emission factors needed Companies should collect data that allows the calculation of emissions per unit, per time period stored. This can be expressed in several different ways, including: **••** Emission factor per pallet per day stored in facility **••** Emission factor per square meter or cubic meter per day stored in facility **••** Emission factor per TEU (twenty-foot equivalent unit) stored in facility. ## Data collection guidance Data sources for activity data include: **••** Supplier records **••** Internal management systems. ## Data sources for emission factors include: **••** Life cycle databases **••** Supplier- or company-developed emission factors **••** Industry associations (for example the U.S. Energy information Administration has developed a dataset on average energy use by building type. Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey, at [http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/](http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/)) **••** Academic publications. ## Calculation formula \[4.9\] Average-data method (distribution) ## CO2e emissions from distribution = ## sum across storage facilities: ∑ (volume of stored goods (m3 or pallet or TEU) × average number of days stored (days) × emission factor for storage facility (kg CO2e/m3 or pallet or TEU/day)) _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[70\] * * * ## CATEGORY 4 Upstream Transportation and Distribution ## Example \[4.6\] Calculating emissions from upstream distribution using the average-data method Company A is a producer of pasta. Its products are stored at distribution centers and then sent for retail sale in supermarkets. Company A collects data on the total volume needed to store its goods at storage facilities and the average number of days its goods are stored. Emission factors are collected from an academic publication. The information is summarized in the table: ## Storage facility Total volume of Average days Emission factor of storage (kg ## types stored goods (m3) stored CO2e/m3/day) Distribution center 4,000 2 0.01 Supermarkets 4,000 2 0.02 Note: the activity data and emission factors in this example are for illustrative purposes only. ## the emissions can be calculated as follows: ∑ (volume stored goods (m3) × number of days stored (days) × emission factor for storage facility (kg CO2e/m3/day)) = (4,000 × 2 × 0.01) + (4,000 × 2 × 0.02) = 80 + 160 = 240 kg CO2e _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[71\] * * * _**5**_ ### Category 5: Waste Generated in Operations #### Category description ategory 5 includes emissions from third-party disposal and treatment of waste #### generated in the reporting company’s owned or controlled operations in the # Creporting year. This category includes emissions from disposal of both solid #### waste and wastewater. Only waste treatment in facilities owned or operated by third parties is included in scope 3. Waste treatment at facilities owned or controlled by the reporting company is accounted for in scope 1 and scope 2. Treatment of waste generated in operations is categorized as an upstream scope 3 category because waste management services are purchased by the reporting company. This category includes all future emissions that result from waste generated in the reporting year. (See chapter 5.4 of the Scope 3 Standard for more information on the time boundary of scope 3 categories.) ##### Waste treatment activities may include: **••** Disposal in a landfill **••** Disposal in a landfill with landfill-gas-to-energy (LFGTE) – that is, combustion of landfill gas to generate electricity **••** Recovery for recycling **••** Incineration **••** Composting **••** Waste-to-energy (WTE) or energy-from-waste (EfW) – that is, combustion of municipal solid waste (MSW) to generate electricity **••** Wastewater treatment. A reporting company’s scope 3 emissions from waste generated in operations derive from the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of solid waste and wastewater management companies. Companies may optionally include emissions from transportation of waste in vehicles operated by a third party. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[72\] * * * Calculating emissions from waste generated in operations Different types of waste generate different types and quantities of greenhouse gases. Depending on the type of waste, the following greenhouse gases may be generated: •• CO2 (from degradation of both fossil and biogenic carbon contained in waste) •• \\mathrm{C O}\_{2} •• CH4 (principally from decomposition of biogenic materials in landfill or WTE technologies) •• {\\mathrm{C H}}\_{4} •• HFCs (from the disposal of refrigeration and air conditioning units). \\mathsf{H F C S} Companies may use any one of the following methods to calculate emissions from waste generated in their operations, but managed by third parties: •• Supplier-specific method, which involves collecting waste-specific scope 1 and scope 2 emissions data directly from waste treatment companies (e.g., for incineration, recovery for recycling) •• Waste-type-specific method, which involves using emission factors for specific waste types and waste treatment •• Waste-type-specific method, which involves using emission factors for specific waste types and waste treatment methods •• •• Average-data method, which involves estimating emissions based on total waste going to each disposal method (e.g., landfill) and average emission factors for each disposal method. To optionally report emissions from the transportation of waste, refer to category 4 (Upstream transportation and distribution) for calculation methodologies. Figure 5.2 gives a decision tree for selecting a calculation method for emissions from waste generated in operations. Figure \[5.2\] Decision tree for selecting a calculation method for emissions from waste generated in operations * * * ## CATEGORY 5 Waste Generated in Operations ## Supplier-specific method In certain cases, third party waste-treatment companies may be able to provide waste-specific scope 1 and scope 2 emissions data directly to customers (e.g., for incineration, recovery for recycling). ## Activity data needed Companies should collect: **••** Allocated scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of the waste-treatment company (allocated to the waste collected from the reporting company). ## Emission factors needed If using the supplier-specific method, the reporting company collects emissions data from waste treatment companies, so no emission factors are required (the company would have already used emission factors to calculate the emissions). ## Calculation formula \[5.1\] Supplier-specific method ## CO2e emissions from waste generated in operations = ## sum across waste treatment providers: ∑ allocated scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of waste treatment company ## Waste-type-specific method Emissions from waste depend on the type of waste being disposed of, and the waste diversion method. Therefore, companies should try to differentiate waste based on its type (e.g., cardboard, food-waste, wastewater) and the waste treatment method (e.g., incinerated, landfilled, recycled, wastewater). ## Activity data needed Companies should collect: **••** Waste produced (e.g., tonne/ cubic meter) and type of waste generated in operations **••** For each waste type, specific waste treatment method applied (e.g., landfilled, incinerated, recycled). Because many waste operators charge for waste disposal by the method used, disposal methods may be identified on utility bills. The information may also be stored on internal IT systems. Companies with leased facilities may have difficulty obtaining primary data. Guidance on improving data collection can be found in chapter 7 of the Scope 3 Standard. ## Emission factors needed Companies should collect: **••** Waste type-specific and waste treatment-specific emission factors. The emission factors should include end-of-life processes only. Emission factors may include emissions from transportation of waste. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[74\] * * * Data collection guidance Data sources for emission factors include: •• Calculated emission factors using IPCC Guidelines (2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 5), available at [http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol5.html](http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol5.html) •• •• Life cycle databases •• •• Industry associations. Calculation formula \[5.2\] Waste-type-specific method CO2e emissions from waste generated in operations = sum across waste types: ∑ (waste produced (tonnes or m3) × waste type and waste treatment specific emission factor (kg CO2e/tonne or m3)) Example \[5.1\] Calculating emissions from waste generated in operations using the waste-type-specific method | Waste type | Waste produced | Waste treatment | Waste type and waste treatment specific emission factor\* | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Plastic | 2,000 t | Landfill | 40kgCO2e/t | | Plastic | 5,000 t | Incinerated with energy recovery | 2kgCO2e/ta | | Plastic | 4,000 t | Recycled | 10kgCO2e/tb | | Water disposal | 5,000m3 | Wastewater | 0.5kgCO2e/m3 | Notes: the activity data and emission factors in this example are for illustrative purposes only. a. Includes emissions from preparation and transportation not allocated to the energy produced. b. Includes emissions from material recovery in preparation for recycling not allocated to the recycled material. 5.000m^{3} × waste type and waste treatment specific emission factor (kg CO2e/tonne or m3)) = (2,000 × 40) + (5,000 × 2) + (4,000 × 10) + (5,000 × 0.5) = 132,500 kg CO2e * * * ## CATEGORY 5 Waste Generated in Operations ## Average-data method Companies using the average-data method should collect data based on the total waste diversion rates from the reporting organization. This is often preferable where the type of waste produced is unknown. However, this method has a higher degree of uncertainty than the waste-type-specific method. ## Activity data needed Companies should collect: **••** Total mass of waste generated in operations **••** Proportion of this waste being treated by different methods (e.g., percent landfilled, incinerated, recycled). Because many waste operators charge for waste by disposal method, this data may be collected from utility bills. The information may also be stored on internal IT systems. ## Emission factors needed Companies should collect: **••** Average waste treatment specific emission factors based on all waste disposal types. The emission factors should include end-of-life processes only. ## Data collection guidance Data sources for emission factors include: **••** Life cycle databases **••** National inventories. ## Calculation formula \[5.3\] Average-data method ## CO2e emissions from waste generated in operations = ## sum across waste treatment methods: ∑ (total mass of waste (tonnes) × proportion of total waste being treated by waste treatment method × emission factor of waste treatment method (kg CO2e/tonne)) _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[76\] * * * Example \[5.2\] Calculating emissions from waste generated in operations using the average-data method Company A is a telesales center. The company does not have sufficient information to allow the waste-type specific data method. Company A, therefore, collects data on the total waste collected, the proportion of waste treated by various methods, and average emission factors for waste diversion methods: | Total waste produced (tonnes) | Waste treatment | Proportion(percent) | Average emission factor of waste treatment method(kgCO2e/tonne) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 40 | Landfill | 25 | 300 | | Incinerated with energy recovery | 5 | $0^{a}$ | | | Recycled | 30 | $0^{b}$ | | | Recycled | 20 | $10^{c}$ | | | Composted | 20 | 30 | | Notes: the activity data and emission factors in this example are for illustrative purposes only. a. Emissions from preparation and transportation have been allocated to the energy produced. b. Emissions from material recovery in preparation for recycling have been allocated to the recycled material. c. Emissions from material recovery in preparation for recycling have not been allocated to the recycled material. \ (L(L O)\\vert Delta a a S O\\vert F a S S(C O\\cap e S) Accounting for emissions from recycling × proportion of total waste being treated by waste treatment method × emission factor of waste treatment method (kg CO2e/tonne)) •• The difference in emissions between extracting and processing virgin material versus preparing recycled material for reuse •• A reduction in emissions that would otherwise have occurred if the waste had been sent to a landfill or other waste •• A reduction in emissions that would otherwise have occurred if the waste had been sent to a landfill or other waste treatment method. Companies may encounter recycling in three circumstances, each of which is relevant to a different scope 3 category (see table 5.1 and figure 5.1). \ {\\begin{array}{c}{=(40\\times0.25\\times300)+(40\\times0.05\\times0)+(40\\times0.3\\times0)+(40\\times0.2\\times10)+(40\\times0.2\\times30)}\ {=3,320,\\mathrm{k g},\\mathrm{C O}\_{\ {}}}\\end{array}} * * * Table \[5.1\] Accounting for emissions from recycling across different scope 3 categories | Circumstance | Relevant scope 3 category | | --- | --- | | A Company purchases material with recycled content | Category 1(Purchased goods and services),or Category 2(Capital goods) | | B Company generates waste from its operations that is sent for recycling | Category 5(Waste generated in operations) | | C Company sells products with recyclable content | Category 12(End-of-life treatment of sold products) | Under circumstance A (table 5.1), if a company purchases a product or material that contains recycled content, the upstream emissions of the recycling processes are built into the cradle-to-gate emission factor for that product and would, therefore, be reflected in category 1 (Purchased goods and services). If a company purchases a recycled material that has lower upstream emissions than the equivalent virgin material then this would register as lower emissions in category 1. Under circumstance B, a company may recycle some of its “operational waste”. These emissions are reported under category 5 (Waste generated in operations). Under circumstance C, products with recyclable content eventually become waste, which could be recycled. Emissions generated in this process are reported as category 12 (End-of-life treatment of sold products). (See figure 5.1.) Reporting negative or avoided emissions from recycling Claims of negative or avoided emissions associated with recycling are claims beyond a reduction in processing emissions If there is doubt about which processes are allocated to the recycled material (circumstance A), it may be helpful to look at which processes are included in the cradle-to-gate emission factor for the material when it is used as an input. Any processes not included in that factor, but applicable to the company’s supply chain, should be included in category 5 or category 12 because they have not been allocated to the recycled material. The recycled content method is recommended for scope 3 inventories because it is easy to use and generally consistent with secondary emission factors available for recycled material inputs. However, companies may use other methods if they are more applicable to specific materials in their supply chain. For example, the “closed loop approximation method” may be applicable when a recycled material output has the same inherent properties as virgin material input into the same supply chain. This method, also defined in more detail in section 9.3.6 of the Product Standard, accounts for the impact that end-of-life recycling has on the net virgin acquisition of a material. If there is uncertainty about which recycling method is appropriate for a given material or if the supply chain is complex, the recycled content method is the recommended choice to avoid double counting or miscounting of emissions. The recycled content method is recommended for scope 3 inventories because it is easy to use and generally consistent with secondary emission factors available for recycled material inputs. However, companies may use other methods if they are more applicable to specific materials in their supply chain. For example, the “closed loop approximation method” may be applicable when a recycled material output has the same inherent properties as virgin material input into the same supply chain. This method, also defined in more detail in section 9.3.6 of the Product Standard, accounts for the impact that end-of-life recycling has on the net virgin acquisition of a material. If there is uncertainty about which recycling method is appropriate for a given material or if the supply chain is complex, the recycled content method is the recommended choice to avoid double counting or miscounting of emissions. * * * (as described in circumstances B and C above). Negative or avoided emissions claims refer to a comparison of the emissions from processing the recycled material relative to the emissions from producing the equivalent virgin material. Any claims of avoided emissions associated with recycling should not be included in, or deducted from, the scope 3 inventory, but may instead be reported separately from scope 1, scope 2, and scope 3 emissions. Companies that report avoided emissions should also provide data to support the claim that emissions were avoided (e.g., that recycled materials are collected, recycled, and used) and report the methodology, data sources, system boundary, time period, and other assumptions used to calculate avoided emissions. For more information on avoided emissions, see section 9.5 of the Scope 3 Standard (see also “Reporting additional metrics for recycling and waste-to-energy,” below). Figure \[5.1\] Using the recycled content method to account for emissions from recycling 1. wheat * * * Accounting for emissions from incineration with energy recovery (waste-to-energy) Attributing emissions from waste-to-energy is similar to the approach taken for recycling. Companies may both generate waste that is incinerated with energy recovery (waste-to-energy) and consume energy that is generated by waste-to-energy processes. If a company purchases energy from the same facility that it sends its waste to, then accounting for emissions from the waste-to-energy combustion process both upstream and downstream would double count the emissions. To avoid double counting, a company should account for upstream emissions from purchased energy generated from waste in scope 2\. (In most cases, the emissions associated with combustion of waste to produce energy will be included in the grid average emission factor). Companies should account for emissions from preparing and transporting waste that will be combusted in a waste-to-energy facility in category 5, but should not account for emissions from the waste-to-energy combustion process itself. These emissions should be included in scope 2 by the consumers of energy generated from waste. If waste from operations is incinerated and used for energy on-site and under operational or financial control, the emissions associated with the incineration are included as scope 1 (and scope 2 would decrease as a result of a reduction in purchased energy). Companies should not report negative or avoided emissions associated with waste-toenergy in the inventory. This guidance does not apply to accounting for emissions from waste that is incinerated without energy recovery. All emissions from combusting waste without energy recovery are reported by the company generating the waste under scope 3, category 5 (Waste generated in operations). Reporting additional information for recycling and waste-to-energy Reporting additional information for recycling and waste-to-energy Under the accounting methodology described above, emissions from recycling and waste-to-energy both appear to have a similar effect on the reporting company’s scope 3 category 5 emissions (i.e., emissions from both will be reported as close to zero) based on the scope 3 boundary definition. It is, therefore, suggested that companies separately report additional information to help identify the full GHG impacts within and outside their inventory boundary and make informed decisions about the best options for waste treatment (e.g. recycling compared to waste-to-energy). If electricity is generated from waste-to-energy, companies may report separately the emissions per unit of net electrical generation from the combustion stage of waste-to-energy relative to the local grid average electricity emission factor (tonnes CO2e per kWh). For example incinerating plastic waste is likely to be more carbon-intensive per kWh of electricity generated than the grid average. Reporting this metric would help companies understand whether sending their waste to a waste-to-energy facility is leading to more- or less-carbon-intensive electricity for the region. Similarly in the case of recycling, it is suggested that companies report separately the recycling emissions relative to the Emissions from wastewater are highly variable depending on how much processing is needed to treat the water (determined by biological oxygen demand \[BOD\] and/or chemical oxygen demand \[COD\]). The following industries often have higher emissions from wastewater (where wastewater is not treated onsite): starch refining; alcohol refining; pulp and paper; vegetables, fruits, and juices; and food processing. Companies in these industries should calculate emissions from wastewater using methods provided in the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 5 Waste, available at [http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol5.html](http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol5.html). * * * _**6**_ ### Category 6: Business Travel #### Category description his category includes emissions from the transportation of employees for business- #### related activities in vehicles owned or operated by third parties, such as aircraft, # Ttrains, buses, and passenger cars. Emissions from transportation in vehicles owned or controlled by the reporting company are accounted for in either scope 1 (for fuel use), or in the case of electric vehicles, scope 2 (for electricity use). Emissions from leased vehicles operated by the reporting company not included in scope 1 or scope 2 are accounted for in scope 3, category 8 (Upstream leased assets). Emissions from transportation of employees to and from work are accounted for in scope 3, category 7 (Employee commuting). See table 6.1. Emissions from business travel may arise from: **••** Air travel **••** Rail travel **••** Bus travel **••** Automobile travel (e.g., business travel in rental cars or employee-owned vehicles other than employee commuting to and from work) **••** Other modes of travel. Companies may optionally include emissions from business travelers staying in hotels. A reporting company’s scope 3 emissions from business travel include the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of transportation companies (e.g., airlines). _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[81\] * * * ## CATEGORY 6 Business Travel ## Table \[6.1\] Accounting for employee transportation across the value chain ## Activity Relevant category of emissions Emissions from transportation in vehicles owned or controlled by Scope 1 (for vehicles that consume fuel) and the reporting company scope 2 (for vehicles that consume electricity) Emissions from the transportation of employees for business-re-Scope 3, category 6 (Business travel) lated activities in vehicles owned or operated by third parties Emissions from transportation of employees to and from work Scope 3, category 7 (Employee commuting) Emissions from leased vehicles operated by the reporting com-Scope 3, category 8 (Upstream leased assets) pany not included in scope 1 or scope 2 # Calculating emissions from business travel Figure 6.1 gives a decision tree for selecting a calculation method for emissions from business travel. Companies may use one of the following methods to calculate scope 3 emissions from business travel: **•• Fuel-based method, which involves determining the amount of fuel consumed during business travel (i.e., scope 1** and scope 2 emissions of transport providers) and applying the appropriate emission factor for that fuel **•• Distance-based method, which involves determining the distance and mode of business trips, then applying the** appropriate emission factor for the mode used **•• Spend-based method, which involves determining the amount of money spent on each mode of business travel** transport and applying secondary (EEIO) emission factors. ## Figure \[6.1\] Decision tree for selecting a calculation method for emissions from business travel _**Does business travel**_ _**contribute significantly to**_ _**scope 3 emissions (based on**_ _**screening) or is engagement Is data available on the**_ _**with travel providers types and quantities/cost Use the**_ _**otherwise relevant to the of fuels consumed fuel-based method**_ _**yes yes**_ _**business goals? during travel?**_ _**no no**_ _**Is data available on Use the**_ _**distance travelled? distance-based method**_ _**yes**_ _**no**_ _**Is data available on the**_ _**Use the**_ _**amount of money spent yes**_ _**spend-based method**_ _**on travel providers?**_ _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[82\] * * * Fuel-based method The calculation methodology for the fuel-based method does not differ from the fuel-based method in category 4 (Upstream transport and distribution). For guidance on calculating emissions using this method, refer to the guidance for category 4 (Upstream transport and distribution). Companies may optionally collect data on the number of hotel nights incurred during business travel by hotel type. Under this method, they add the number of hotel nights and the emissions factor of the hotel (as shown in the distance-based method below) to the fuel-based method in category 4 (Upstream transport and distribution). Distance-based method If data on fuel use is unavailable, companies may use the distance-based method. The distance-based method involves multiplying activity data (i.e., vehicle-kilometers or person-kilometers travelled by vehicle type) by emission factors (typically default national emission factors by vehicle type). Vehicle types include all categories of aircraft, rail, subway, bus, automobile, etc. Companies should collect data on: •• Total distance travelled by each mode of transport (air, train, bus, car, etc.) for employees in the reporting year. Where possible, companies should also collect data on: •• Countries of travel (since transportation emission factors vary by country) •• Specific types of vehicles used for travel (since transportation emission factors vary by vehicle types) •• Specific types of vehicles used for travel (since transportation emission factors vary by vehicle types) from transport providers •• The specific passenger vehicle type and the relevant emission factor. •• The specific passenger vehicle type and the relevant emission factor. Companies may optionally collect data on the number of hotel nights incurred during business travel by hotel type. Emission factors needed Activity data should be expressed as the number of kilometers travelled or kilometers travelled per person for a particular vehicle type (e.g., passenger-kilometer). The activity data should be summed to obtain total annual kilometers or person-kilometers travelled by each vehicle type used by the company. Companies should collect: Companies may optionally use emission factors for hotel stays by hotel type (e.g., kilograms of CO2e emitted per hotel night). C O\_{2}C(C H\_{4}N{\_{2}}O,{H\_C}O C({\_\_{2}}) * * * ## CATEGORY 6 Business Travel ## Data collection guidance Methods of data collection include: **••** Automatic tracking of distance travelled by mode through a travel agency or other travel providers **••** Automatic tracking of distance travelled by mode through internal expense and reimbursement systems, which may require adding new questions on distance travelled and mode of transport to travel or expense forms submitted by employees **••** Annual surveys/questionnaires of employees **••** Working with travel providers (e.g., transportation companies, hotels) to obtain GHG emissions data. Collecting travel data from all employees may not be feasible. In such a case, companies may extrapolate from a representative sample of employees to the total business travel of all employees. For example, a company may have 4,000 employees, each of whom has different travel profiles. The company may extrapolate from a representative sample of 400 employees to approximate the total business travel of all employees. Companies may also choose to group or combine data from business travellers with similar travel profiles. See Appendix A for more information on sampling methods. ## Calculation resources include: **••** GHG Protocol Calculation Tool, “Mobile Combustion GHG Emissions Calculation Tool. Version 2.0. June 2009,” developed by World Resources Institute, available at [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools) **••** U.S. EPA Climate Leaders GHG Inventory Protocol, “Optional Emissions from Commuting, Business Travel and Product Transport,” available at: [http://www.epa.gov/stateply/documents/resources/commute\_travel\_product.pdf](http://www.epa.gov/stateply/documents/resources/commute_travel_product.pdf) **••** For UK organizations, the Department for Transport provides guidance and a calculation tool for work-related travel at: [http://www2.dft.gov.uk/pgr/sustainable/greenhousegasemissions/](http://www2.dft.gov.uk/pgr/sustainable/greenhousegasemissions/). Once the company has determined total annual distance travelled by each mode of transport (aggregated across all employees), apply the formula below to calculate emissions. ## Calculation formula \[6.1\] Distance-based method ## CO2e emissions from business travel = ## sum across vehicle types: ∑ (distance travelled by vehicle type (vehicle-km or passenger-km) × vehicle specific emission factor (kg CO2e/vehicle-km or kg CO2e/passenger-km)) + **(optional)** ∑ (annual number of hotel nights (nights) × hotel emission factor (kg CO2e/night)) _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[84\] * * * Example \[6.1\] Calculating emissions from business travel using the distance-based method Company A is a financial services company. Every year, it sends groups of professionals to industry conferences in the United Kingdom, Australia, and the United States. For each group, the company has collected activity data on the typical distances travelled and modes of transport. Data was collected via employee questionnaires and information provided by travel agencies and transportation companies. It is assumed that each member of the group travelled the same amount in the same business trip. | Road Travel | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Employee Group | Number of employees in group | Car type | Average employees per vehicle | Location | Distance(km) | Emission factor(kg CO2e/vehicle-km) | | Group 1 | 10 | Hybrid | 2 | United States | 50 | 1 | | Group 2 | 20 | Average gasoline car | 2 | Australia | 200 | 2 | | Group 3 | 100 | Four wheel drive | 3 | United States | 100 | 4 | | Air Travel | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Employee Group | Number of employees in group | Flight type | Distance(km) | Emission factor(kg CO2e/passenger-km) | | Group 1 | 10 | Long haul | 10000 | 5 | | Group 2 | 20 | Short haul | 15000 | 6 | | Group 3 | 100 | Long haul | 12000 | 5 | Note: the activity data and emission factors in this example are for illustrative purposes only. * * * ## CATEGORY 6 Business Travel ## Example \[6.1\] Calculating emissions from business travel using the distance-based method (continued) Three types of flights are identified for calculating emission factors. Short-haul flights have higher emission factors due to strong influence of the landing/take off cycle on emissions, whereas long-haul flights have slightly higher emissions than medium-haul flights due to the additional weight of fuel. Many countries have specific definitions of types of flights. Below is an indicative description: **••** Short haul – flights less than 3 hours in length **••** Medium haul – flights 3-6 hours in length \*\*••\*\*Long haul – journeys made by wide-bodied aircrafts that fly long distance, typically more than 6.5 hours. ## total business travel emissions of Company A can be calculated as follows: emissions from road travel = ∑ (distance travelled by vehicle type (vehicle-km or passenger-km) × vehicle specific emission factor (kg CO2e/vehicle-km or kg CO2e/passenger-km)) = (10/2 × 50 × 1) + (20/2 × 200 × 2) + (100/3 × 100 × 4) = 17,583.33 kg CO2e emissions from air travel = ∑ (distance travelled by vehicle type (vehicle-km or passenger-km) × vehicle specific emission factor (kg CO2e/vehicle-km or kg CO2e/passenger-km)) = (10 × 10,000 × 5) + (20 × 15,000 × 6) + (100 × 12,000 × 5) = 8,300,000 kg CO2e total emissions from employee travel = emissions from road travel + emissions from air travel = 17,583.33 + 8,300,000 = 8,317,583.33 kg CO2e ## Spend-based method If it is not possible to use either the fuel- or distance-based methods, companies may use the spend-based method. The calculation method is same as the spend-based method described in Category 4: Upstream Transportation and Distribution, with the difference that the activity data is the amount spent on business travel by type/mode of transport. Refer to the spend-based method in Category 4 for a description of this method. Companies may optionally collect data on the number of hotel nights incurred during business travel by hotel type. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[86\] * * * _**7**_ ## Category 7: Employee Commuting ### Category description This category includes emissions from the transportation of employees4 between their homes and their worksites. Emissions from employee commuting may arise from: **••** Automobile travel **••** Bus travel **••** Rail travel **••** Air travel **••** Other modes of transportation (e.g., subway, bicycling, walking). Companies may include emissions from teleworking (i.e., employees working remotely) in this category. A reporting company’s scope 3 emissions from employee commuting include the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of employees and third-party transportation providers. ### Calculating emissions from employee commuting Figure 7.1 offers a decision tree for selecting a calculation method for scope 3 emissions from employee commuting. Companies may use one of the following methods: **•• Fuel-based method, which involves determining the amount of fuel consumed during commuting and applying the** appropriate emission factor for that fuel **•• Distance-based method, which involves collecting data from employees on commuting patterns (e.g., distance** travelled and mode used for commuting) and applying appropriate emission factors for the modes used **•• Average-data method, which involves estimating emissions from employee commuting based on average** (e.g., national) data on commuting patterns. “Employees” refers to employees of entities and facilities owned, operated, or leased by the reporting company. Companies may include employees of other relevant entities (e.g., franchises or outsourced operations) in this category, as well as consultants, contractors, and other individuals who are not employees of the company, but commute to facilities owned and operated by the company. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[87\] * * * Figure \[7.1\] Decision tree for selecting a calculation method for emissions from employee commuting Fuel-based method If data is available on the quantity or amount spent on fuel by employees for commuting, companies may apply the fuel-based method. The calculation methodology for the fuel-based method is the same as the fuel-based method in category 4 (Upstream transport and distribution). For guidance on calculating emissions using this method, refer to the guidance for category 4 (Upstream transport and distribution). If the fuel-based method is used to calculate emissions from commuting on public transport, then emissions need to be allocated to the employee(s). For more information on allocation, see chapter 8 of the Scope 3 Standard. Distance-based method Activity data needed Activity data needed Companies should collect data on the following: Companies should collect data on the following: •• Total distance travelled by employees over the reporting period (e.g., passenger-kilometers travelled) •• Mode of transport used for commuting (e.g., train, subway, bus, car, bicycle). •• Mode of transport used for commuting (e.g., train, subway, bus, car, bicycle). * * * Emission factors needed Companies should collect: •• Emission factors for each mode of transport (usually expressed in units of greenhouse gas (CO2, CH4, N2O, or CO2e) emitted per passenger-kilometers travelled). C C\_{2}C\_{2}C\_{4}N{ _{}}N N{2}O,O O C O_{2}O Note: For air travel emission factors, multipliers or other corrections to account for radiative forcing may be applied to the GWP of emissions arising from aircraft transport. Where used, companies should disclose the specific factor used. Data collection guidance Companies should collect data on employee commuting habits, for example through a survey. Companies should survey their employees annually to obtain information on average commuting habits. Types of data to collect include: •• Distance travelled by employees per day, or location of residence and office •• •• The number of days per week that employees use different vehicle types (all categories of subway, car, bus, train, bicycle, etc.) •• Number of commuting days per week and number of weeks worked per year •• •• If the company is multinational: employees’ region of residence/work (since transportation emission factors vary by region) •• •• Whether there is a significant car-pooling scheme in operation, the proportion of employees using the scheme and the average occupancy per vehicle •• •• If applicable, the amount of energy used from teleworking (e.g., kWh of gas, electricity consumed). Collecting commuting data from all employees through a survey may not be feasible. Companies may extrapolate from a representative sample of employees to represent the total commuting patterns of all employees. For example, a company with 4,000 employees, who each have different commuting profiles, may extrapolate from a representative sample of, for example, 1,000 employees to approximate the total commuting of all employees. See Appendix A for more information on sampling. CO2e emissions from employee travel = then, sum across vehicle types to determine total emissions: kg CO2e from employee commuting kg CO2e from employee commuting = ∑ (total distance travelled by vehicle type (vehicle-km or passenger-km) \\mathrm{C O\_{2}e} total distance travelled by vehicle type (vehicle-km or passenger-km) = ∑ (daily one-way distance between home and work (km) × 2 × number of commuting days per year) (optionally) for each energy source used in teleworking: ∑ (quantities of energy consumed (kWh) × emission factor for energy source (kg CO2 ∑ (quantities of energy consumed (kWh) × emission factor for energy source (kg CO2e/kWh)) * * * Companies should convert daily commuting distance into annual commuting distance by multiplying the daily distance by the number of times the trip occurs during the reporting period. For example, if a company collects distance data on one-way journeys, the company should multiply the distance by the number of working days in the reporting year, and then multiply by two to account for daily return journeys. Distance-travelled data by transport mode should be summed across all employees to obtain total annual kilometers or passenger-kilometers travelled by each mode of transport. Companies may optionally calculate the emissions of teleworking from home. To calculate these emissions, a baseline emissions scenario should first be established. Baseline emissions occur regardless of whether or not the employee was at home (e.g., energy consumed by the refrigerator). The reporting company should only account for the additional emissions resulting from working from home, for example the electricity usage as a result of running the air conditioner to stay cool. Example \[7.1\] Calculating emissions from employee travel using the distance-based method Company A is a small advertising services company, with three employees working 48 weeks per year. To calculate emissions from employee commuting, it creates an “employee commuting profile” for each employee. Each employee completes a questionnaire the results of which are summarized in the following table: | Employee | Rail commute(times per week) | One way distance by rail(km) | Rail emission factor(kgCO2e/passenger-kilometer) | Car commute(times per week) | Car emission factor(kgCO2e/vehicle-kilometer) | One way distance by car(km) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | A | 5 | 10 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.2 | N/A | | B | 4 | 10 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.2 | 15 | | C | 0 | N/A | 0.1 | 5 | 0.2 | 20 | Note: The activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. total emissions from employee commuting for the reporting year is calculated as: ∑ (total distance travelled by vehicle type (vehicle-km or passenger-km) ∑ (daily one way distance between home and work (km) × 2 × 5 × number of commuting weeks per year) = (15 × 2 × 1 × 48) + (20 × 2 × 5 × 48) = 11,040 km =(10\\times2\\times5\\times48)+(10\\times2\\times4\\times48)=8,640\ mathsf k r r * * * Average-data method If company specific data is unavailable, companies may use average secondary activity data to estimate distance travelled and mode of transport. This may include using: •• Average daily commuting distances of typical employees •• •• Average modes of transport of typical employees •• •• Average number of commuting days per week and average number of weeks worked per year. Such estimation requires making several simplifying assumptions, which add uncertainty to the emissions estimates. Activity data needed •• Number of employees •• Average distance travelled by an average employee per day •• •• Average breakdown of transport modes used by employees •• Average number working days per year. •• Average number working days per year. Emission factors needed •• Companies should collect: •• Companies should collect: •• Emission factors for each mode of transport (usually expressed as kilograms of GHG emitted per passenger per kilometer travelled). Data collection guidance Company may collect average secondary data from sources such as national transportation departments, ministries or Company may collect average secondary data from sources such as national transportation departments, ministries or agencies, national statistics publications, and/or industry associations. For example, the UK Office for National Statistics publishes average commuting patterns and distances ( [http://www](http://www/). neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/Info.do?page=analysisandguidance/commutingstatistics/commutingstatistics.htm). Calculation resources include: •• GHG Protocol Calculation Tool, “Mobile Combustion GHG Emissions Calculation Tool. Version 2.0. June 2009,” developed by World Resources Institute, available at [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools) •• U.S. EPA Climate Leaders GHG Inventory Protocol, “Optional Emissions from Commuting, Business Travel and •• U.S. EPA Climate Leaders GHG Inventory Protocol, “Optional Emissions from Commuting, Business Travel and Product Transport,” available at: [http://www.epa.gov/stateply/documents/resources/commute\_travel\_product.pdf](http://www.epa.gov/stateply/documents/resources/commute_travel_product.pdf) •• For UK organizations, the Department for Transport provides guidance and a calculation tool for work-related travel •• For UK organizations, the Department for Transport provides guidance and a calculation tool for work-related travel at: [http://www2.dft.gov.uk/pgr/sustainable/greenhousegasemissions/](http://www2.dft.gov.uk/pgr/sustainable/greenhousegasemissions/). * * * Calculation formula \[7.2\] Average-data method CO2e emissions from employee commuting = sum across each transport mode: ∑ (total number of employees × % of employees using mode of transport × one way commuting distance (vehicle-km or passenger-km) × 2 × working days per year × emission factor of transport mode (kg CO2e/vehicle-km or kg CO2e/passenger-km)) Companies should convert average daily commuting distance into annual average commuting distance by multiplying the one-way distance by two for the daily return trip and by the average number of days worked per year (i.e., excluding weekends and days spent on business travel, vacation, or working from home). Example \[7.2\] Calculating emissions from employee travel using the average data method Company A is a manufacturer in the United Kingdom with over 10,000 employees. To determine the distance and mode of transport of employee travel, it refers to the UK Department of Transport’s information regarding average commute choices and distances of commuters. National statistics show that UK workers work on average 235 days a year. The example assumes that employees do not share rides. The results of the study are shown below: | Commute group | Percent of total commutes | Average one-way distance(km) | Emission factor(kgCO2e/vehicle or passengerkm) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rail | 50 | 10 | 0.1 | | Car | 30 | 15 | 0.2 | | Foot | 15 | 1 | 0.0 | | Bus | 5 | 5 | 0.1 | Note: The activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. * * * ## CATEGORY 7 Employee Commuting ## Example \[7.2\] Calculating emissions from employee travel using the average data method (continued) ## CO2e emissions by mode of transport can be calculated as follows: emissions from employee commuting = ∑ (total number of employees × % of employees using mode of transport × one way commuting distance (vehicle-km or passenger-km) × 2 × working days per year × emission factor of transport mode (kg CO2e/vehicle-km or kg CO2e/passenger-km)) ## rail commuters: (10,000 × 50% × 10 × 2 × 235 × 0.1) = 2,350,000 kg CO2e **car commuters:** (10,000 × 30% × 15 × 2 × 235 × 0.2) = 4,230,000 kg CO2e **foot commuters:** (10,000 × 15% × 1 × 2 × 235 × 0) = 0 kg CO2e **bus commuters:** (10,000 × 5% × 5 × 2 × 235 × 0.1) = 117,500 kg CO2e ## total CO2e of employee travel can be calculated as follows: = 2,350,000 + 4,230,000 + 0 + 117,500 = 6,697,500kg CO2e _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[93\] * * * _**8**_ ### Category 8: Upstream Leased Assets **Category description** _ategory 8 includes emissions from the operation of assets that are leased by the_ #### reporting company in the reporting year and not already included in the reporting # Ccompany’s scope 1 or scope 2 inventories. This category is applicable only to companies #### that operate leased assets (i.e., lessees). For companies that own and lease assets to others #### (i.e., lessors), see category 13 (Downstream leased assets). Leased assets may be included in a company’s scope 1 or scope 2 inventory depending on the type of lease and the consolidation approach the company uses to define its organizational boundaries (see section 5.2 of the Scope 3 Standard). If the reporting company leases an asset for only part of the reporting year, it should account for emissions for the portion of the year that the asset was leased. A reporting company’s scope 3 emissions from upstream leased assets include the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of lessors (depending on the lessor’s consolidation approach). See Appendix A of the Scope 3 Standard for more information on accounting for emissions from leased assets. #### Calculating emissions from leased assets Figure 8.1 shows a decision tree for selecting a calculation method for emissions from upstream leased assets. Companies may use one of the following methods: **•• Asset-specific method, which involves collecting asset-specific (e.g., site-specific) fuel and energy use data and** process and fugitive emissions data or scope 1 and scope 2 emissions data from individual leased assets **•• Lessor-specific method, which involves collecting the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from lessor(s) and allocating** emissions to the relevant leased asset(s) _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[94\] * * * •• Average data method, which involves estimating emissions for each leased asset, or groups of leased assets, based on average data, such as average emissions per asset type or floor space. Companies may also calculate the life cycle emissions associated with manufacturing or constructing leased assets. Figure \[8.1\] Decision tree for selecting a calculation method for emissions from upstream leased assets This method involves collecting asset-specific (e.g., site-specific) fuel and energy and/or scope 1 and scope 2 emissions data from individual leased assets. Emission factors needed Companies should collect: Companies should collect scope 1 and scope 2 emissions data, or activity data on: Companies should collect: •• Site or regionally specific emission factors for energy sources (e.g., electricity and fuels) per unit of consumption (e.g., kg CO2e/kWh for electricity, kg CO2e/liter for diesel) •• Emission factors of fugitive and process emissions. •• Emission factors of fugitive and process emissions. * * * To optionally calculate emissions associated with manufacturing or construction of leased assets, companies should use life cycle emission factors that include manufacturing and construction. Data collection guidance Data sources for activity data may include: •• Utility bills •• •• Purchase records •• •• Meter readings •• Internal IT systems. Data sources for emission factors include: •• Life cycle databases. A list of life cycle databases is provided on the GHG Protocol website ( [http://www.ghgprotocol](http://www.ghgprotocol/). org/Third-Party-Databases). Additional databases may be added periodically, so continue to check the website. •• •• Company-developed emission factors •• Government agencies (e.g., Defra provides emission factors for the UK) •• Industry associations •• Industry associations •• For activity data, emission factors, and formulas for process and fugitive emissions, see the GHG Protocol website ( [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools) ) and the IPCC 2006 Guidelines ( [http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges](http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges/). or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html). To calculate scope 3 emissions from leased assets, aggregate the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions across all of the reporting company’s leased assets, using this formula: Calculation formula \[8.1\] Asset-specific method CO2e emissions from upstream leased assets = calculate the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions associated with each leased asset: scope 2 emissions of leased asset = ∑ (quantity of electricity, steam, heating, cooling consumed (e.g., kWh) × emission factor for electricity, steam, heating, cooling (e.g., kg CO2e/kWh)) then sum across leased assets: ∑ scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of each leased asset * * * Companies that lease a portion of a building (e.g., an office building) where energy use is not separately sub-metered by the tenant may estimate energy consumed using the reporting company’s share of the building’s total floor space and total building energy use, following this formula: Calculation formula \[8.2\] Allocating emissions from leased buildings that are not sub-metered | energy use from leased space(kWh)= | | --- | | (reporting company's area(m2))/ (building's total area(m2)) | | × building's occupancy rate(e.g.,0.75)) | | × building's total energy use(kWh) | Example \[8.1\] Calculating emissions from upstream leased assets using the asset-specific method Company B leases an entire floor of office space from Company D for one year. Company B is able to collect data on the fuel, electricity, and fugitive emissions of the entire building for the reporting year. Company B leases 200 m2 of the building’s total area of 2,000 m2. The occupancy rate of the building is 75%. Data is summarized in the table below: | | Natural gas(kWh) | Natural gas emission factor(kgCO2e/kWh) | Electricity(kWh) | Electricity emission factor(kgCO2e/kWh) | Fugitive emissions | Fugitive emission factor | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Building | 1,500 | 0.2 | 3,000 | 0.7 | 5 | 1,500 | Note: The activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. * * * ## CATEGORY 8 Upstream Leased Assets ## Example \[8.1\] Calculating emissions from upstream leased assets using the asset-specific method (continued) ## Total natural gas allocation to company B: (reporting company’s area (m2) building’s total area (m2) × building’s occupancy rate (e.g., 0.75) × building’s total natural gas use = 200 / (2000 × 0.75) × 1500 = 200 kWh **total electricity allocation to company B:** reporting company’s area (m2) building’s total area (m2) × building’s occupancy rate (e.g., 0.75) × building’s total electricity use = (200 / (2000 × 0.75) × 3000 = 400 kWh **total fugitives allocation to company B:** reporting company’s area (m2) building’s total area (m2) building’s occupancy rate (e.g., 0.75) × building’s total fugitive emissions = (200 / (2000 × 0.75) × 5 = 0.67 kg **total emissions of leased asset:** = (200 × 0.2) + (400 × 0.7) + (0.67 × 1500) = 1,325 kg CO2e _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[98\] * * * ## CATEGORY 8 Upstream Leased Assets ## Lessor-specific method The lessor-specific method involves collecting the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from lessor(s) and allocating emissions to the relevant leased asset(s). This method is relevant in cases where, for example, office space is leased in a building that is not sub-metered. If the lessor company has data available at the building- or company-level, allocation techniques can be used to apportion emissions to the office space leased by the reporting company. ## Activity data needed Companies should collect lessors’ total scope 1 and scope 2 emissions data, or activity data on: **••** Lessor’s total fuel use and electricity use **••** Lessor’s fugitive emissions (e.g., from refrigerants) **••** Lessor’s process emissions (if applicable). ## Emission factors needed **••** Site or regionally specific emission factors for energy sources (e.g., electricity and fuels) per unit of consumption (e.g., kg CO2e/kWh for electricity, kg CO2e/liter for diesel) **••** Emission factors of fugitive and process emissions. To allocate emissions, companies should collect data on: **••** Total area/volume/quantity of lessors’ assets **••** Total area/volume/quantity of the reporting company’s leased assets. For guidance on allocating emissions, refer to chapter 8 of the Scope 3 Standard. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[99\] * * * calculate the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions associated with each lessor: The average-data method involves estimating emissions for each leased asset, or groups of leased assets, based on average statistics and secondary data, such as average emissions per asset type or floor space. The average-data method should be used when purchase records, electricity bills, or meter readings of fuel or energy use are not available or applicable. Approaches include: •• Floor space of each leased building •• Number of leased buildings, by building type (e.g., office, retail, warehouse, factory, etc.) •• Estimated emissions based on occupied floor space by asset/building type (for leased buildings) •• Estimated emissions based on number and type of leased assets. •• Number of leased buildings, by building type (e.g., office, retail, warehouse, factory, etc.) •• Number and type of leased assets other than buildings that give rise to scope 1 or scope 2 emissions (e.g., company •• Number and type of leased assets other than buildings that give rise to scope 1 or scope 2 emissions (e.g., company cars, trucks). Companies should collect data on: Note that the average-data method is less accurate than the lessor-specific method and limits the ability of companies to track their performance of GHG reduction actions. * * * ## CATEGORY 8 Upstream Leased Assets ## Emission factors needed Companies should collect: **••** Average emission factors by floor space, expressed in units of emissions per square meter, square foot occupied (e.g., kg CO2e/m2/year) **••** Average emission factors by building type, expressed in units of emissions per building (e.g., kg CO2e/small office block/year) **••** Emission factors by asset type, expressed in units of emissions per asset (e.g., kg CO2e/car/year). ## Data collection guidance The U.S. Energy Information Administration has developed a dataset on average energy use by building type. Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey, at: [http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs](http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs) ## Calculation formula \[8.4\] Average-data method for leased buildings (where floor space data is available) ## CO2e emissions from leased assets = ## sum across building types: ∑ (total floor space of building type (m2) × average emission factor for building type (kg CO2e/m2/year)) ## Calculation formula \[8.5\] Average-data method for leased assets other than buildings and for leased ## buildings where floor space data is unavailable ## CO2e emissions from leased assets = ## sum across asset types: ∑ (number of assets x average emissions per asset type (kg CO2e/asset type/year)) _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[101\] * * * _**9**_ ### Category 9: Downstream Transportation ### and Distribution #### Category description his category includes emissions that occur in the reporting year from transportation #### and distribution of sold products in vehicles and facilities not owned or controlled by # Tthe reporting company. This category also includes emissions from retail and storage. Outbound transportation and distribution services that are purchased by the reporting company are excluded from category 9 and included in category 4 (Upstream transportation and distribution) because the reporting company purchases the service. Category 9 includes only emissions from transportation and distribution of products after the point of sale. See table 5.7 in the Scope 3 Standard for guidance in accounting for emissions from transportation and distribution in the value chain. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[102\] * * * 12. wind turbines 13. chicken Figure \[9.1\] Accounting for emissions from transportation and distribution of sold products 14. cow 1 15. cow 2 How to account for scope 3 emissions from transportation & distribution of sold products... | Reporting Company | Transportation of sold products | Retailer | Consumer | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | How to account for scope 3 emissions from transportation & distribution of sold products... | | | | | ...if the company does not pay for transportation of sold products to retailer | Scope 1 & 2 | Scope 3 category 9 | Scope 3 category 9 | | ...if the company does pay for transportation of sold products to retailer | Scope 1 & 2 | Scope 3 category 4 | Scope 3 category 9 | •• Warehouses and distribution centers •• Retail facilities •• Retail facilities •• Air transport •• Rail transport •• •• Marine transport. In this category, companies may include emissions from customers traveling to and from retail stores, which can be significant for companies that own or operate retail facilities. See chapter 5.6 of the Scope 3 Standard for guidance on the applicability of category 9 to final products and intermediate products sold by the reporting company. A reporting company’s scope 3 emissions from downstream transportation and distribution include the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of transportation companies, distribution companies, retailers, and (optionally) customers. If the reporting company sells an intermediate product, the company should report emissions from transportation and distribution of this intermediate product between the point of sale by the reporting company and either (1) the end consumer (if the eventual end use of the intermediate product is known) or (2) business customers (if the eventual end use of the intermediate product is unknown). * * * Calculating emissions from transportation (downstream) The emissions from downstream transportation should follow the calculation methods described in category 4 (Upstream transportation and distribution). Figure 9.1 shows how to determine how to account for emissions from transportation and distribution of sold products. Companies may use either the fuel-based, distance-based or spendbased method. Activity data needed The major difference between calculating upstream and downstream emissions of transportation is likely to be the availability and quality of activity data. Transportation data may be easier to obtain from upstream suppliers than from downstream customers and transportation companies. Therefore, companies may need to use the distance-based method to calculate downstream transportation emissions. If the actual transportation distances are not known, the reporting company may estimate downstream distances by using a combination of: •• Government, academic, or industry publications •• Online maps and calculators •• Online maps and calculators •• Published port-to-port travel distances. •• See emission factors guidance for category 4 (Upstream transportation and distribution). Data collection guidance The UK government produces average freight distances for the economy’s main categories of goods (see [http://www](http://www/). dft.gov.uk/pgr/statistics/datatablespublications/freight/). This database may be used in the absence of purchaserspecific or region-specific data. A list of life cycle databases is provided on the GHG Protocol website ( [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/Third-Party-](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/Third-Party-) Databases). Additional databases may be added periodically, so continue to check the website. Calculating emissions from distribution (downstream) The emissions from downstream distribution should follow the calculation methods described in category 4 (Upstream * * * ## CATEGORY 9 Downstream Transportation and Distribution ## Example \[9.1\] Calculating emissions from downstream transportation Company A sells timber to furniture Company B, which manufactures the timber into furniture, which it sells retail. Company A collects information on the mass of timber sold to Company B and estimates the downstream transport distances of the following: # • From point of sale to Company B (if not paid for by Company A) \*•\*From Company B’s manufacturing facility to retail distribution centers \*•\*From retail distribution centers to retail outlets. The data is summarized in the table below: ## Purchaser Mass of goods Total downstream dis-Transport mode Emission factor ## sold (tonnes) tance transported (km) or vehicle type (kg CO2e/tonne-km) B 4 2,000 Truck 0.2 (rigid, >3.5-7.5t) Note: the activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. ## emissions from downstream transport: ∑ (quantity of goods sold (tonnes) × distance travelled in transport legs (km) × emission factor of transport mode or vehicle type (kg CO2e/tonne-km)) = 4 × 2,000 × 0.2 = 1,600 kg CO2e _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[105\] * * * _**10**_ ### Category 10: Processing of Sold Products #### Category description ategory 10 includes emissions from processing of sold intermediate products #### by third parties (e.g., manufacturers) subsequent to sale by the reporting # Ccompany. Intermediate products are products that require further processing, #### transformation, or inclusion in another product before use (see box 5.3 of the Scope 3 #### Standard), and therefore result in emissions from processing subsequent to sale by the _reporting company and before use by the end consumer. Emissions from processing should be allocated to the intermediate product._ In certain cases, the eventual end use of sold intermediate products may be unknown. For example, a company that produces an intermediate product with many potential downstream applications, each of which has a different GHG emissions profile, may be unable to reasonably estimate the downstream emissions associated with these various end uses. See section 6.4 of the Scope 3 Standard for guidance in cases where downstream emissions associated with sold intermediate products are unknown. See section 5.6 of the Scope 3 Standard for guidance on the applicability of category 10 to final products and intermediate products sold by the reporting company. A reporting company’s scope 3 emissions from processing of sold intermediate products include the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of downstream value chain partners (e.g., manufacturers). _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[106\] * * * Calculating emissions from processing of sold products Figure 10.1 gives a decision tree for selecting a calculation method for calculating scope 3 emissions from processing of sold products. Companies may use either of two methods: •• Site-specific method, which involves determining the amount of fuel and electricity used and the amount of waste generated from processing of sold intermediate products by the third party and applying the appropriate emission factors •• •• Average-data method, which involves estimating emissions for processing of sold intermediate products based on average secondary data, such as average emissions per process or per product. Companies should choose a calculation method based on their business goals and their ability to collect data from processing of sold intermediate products by third parties. In many cases, collecting primary data from downstream value chain partners may be difficult. In such cases, companies should use the average-data method. Figure \[10.1\] Decision tree for selecting a calculation method for emissions from processing of sold products Site-specific method •• Relevant activity data (e.g., fuel use, electricity use, refrigerant use, and waste) and relevant emission factors for each downstream process •• GHG emissions data for each downstream process calculated by downstream value chain partners. •• GHG emissions data for each downstream process calculated by downstream value chain partners. * * * If data cannot be obtained from downstream third party partners, the average data method should be used. Activity data needed Companies should first collect data on the types and quantities of intermediate goods sold by the reporting company. Companies should then collect either site-specific GHG emissions data provided by downstream value chain partners or site-specific activity data from downstream processes, including: •• Quantities of energy (including electricity and fuels) consumed in process(es) •• •• To the extent possible, mass of waste generated in process(es) •• If applicable, activity data related to non-combustion emissions (i.e., industrial process or fugitive emissions). •• If applicable, activity data related to non-combustion emissions (i.e., industrial process or fugitive emissions). Emission factors needed •• Emission factors for fuels •• •• Emission factors for electricity •• •• To the extent possible, emission factors for waste outputs •• If applicable, emission factors related to non-combustion emissions (i.e., industrial process or fugitive emissions). Data collection guidance Companies should collect data on the types and mass of intermediate goods sold by the reporting company from internal records. Companies should request either GHG emissions data or activity data from downstream processes from the downstream value chain partners that control those processes. Downstream partners can obtain this data from, for example: •• Internal IT systems •• •• Utility bills •• •• Purchase receipts •• •• Meter readings. Data sources for emission factors include: •• The list of data sources provided on the GHG Protocol website ( [www.ghgprotocol.org/standards/scope-3-standard](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/standards/scope-3-standard)) •• Company or manufacturer developed emission factors •• Industry associations •• For activity data, emission factors, and formulas for process and fugitive emissions, see the GHG Protocol website ( [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools)) and the IPCC 2006 Guidelines ( [http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges](http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges/). or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html). * * * ## CATEGORY 10 Processing of Sold Products ## Calculation formula \[10.1\] Site-specific method ## CO2e emissions from processing of sold intermediate products = ## sum across fuel consumed in the processing of sold intermediate products: ∑ (quantity of fuel consumed (e.g., liter) × life cycle emission factor for fuel source (e.g., kg CO2e/liter)) + **sum across electricity consumed in the processing of sold intermediate products:** ∑ (quantity of electricity consumed (e.g., kWh) × life cycle emission factor for electricity (e.g., kg CO2e/kWh)) + **sum across refrigerants used in the processing of sold intermediate products:** ∑ (quantity of refrigerant leakage (kg) × Global Warming Potential for refrigerant (kg CO2e/kg)) + **sum across process emissions released in the processing of sold intermediate products** \+ **to the extent possible, sum across waste generated in the in the processing of sold intermediate products:** ∑ (mass of waste output (kg) × emission factor for waste activity (kg CO2e/kg)) _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[109\] * * * Example \[10.1\] Calculating emissions from processing of sold products using the site-specific method Company A, which produces plastic resin, is an exclusive supplier to Company B, which produces plastic handles for consumer goods. Company A collects information from Company B regarding the fuel and electricity used and waste outputs of processing the resin into handles. The information is summarized in the tables below: \ \\mathsf{A}, | Fuel and electricity consumed | Amount(kWh) | Emission factor(kgCO2e/kWh) | | --- | --- | --- | | Natural Gas | 3500 | 0.2 | | Electricity | 2000 | 0.5 | | Waste | Amount(kg) | Emission factor(kgCO2e/kg waste) | | --- | --- | --- | | Waste products | 50 | 0.5 | Note: The activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. Emissions are calculated by multiplying activity data by respective emission factors, as follows: emissions from fuel consumed: ∑ (quantity of fuel consumed (e.g., liter) × emission factor for fuel source (e.g., kg CO2e/liter)) = 3,500 × 0.2 = 700 kg CO2e (e.g9,k g C O\_{2}e/i t e e)) =3,500\\times0.2 emissions from electricity consumed: ∑ (quantity of electricity consumed (e.g., kWh) × emission factor for electricity (e.g., kg CO2 ∑ (quantity of electricity consumed (e.g., kWh) × emission factor for electricity (e.g., kg CO2e/kWh)) = 2,000 × 0.5 = 1,000 kg CO2e emissions from waste output: ∑ (mass of waste output (kg) × emission factor for waste activity (kg CO2 total emissions from processing of sold intermediate products = emissions from fuel + emissions from electricity + emissions from waste = 700 + 1,000 + 25 = 1,725 kg CO2e \ {sf O}\_{2}e/g)) * * * Average data method In this method, companies collect data on the type of downstream process(es) involved in transforming or processing sold intermediate products into final products and apply relevant industry average emission factors to determine emissions. The method should be used when it is not possible to collect data from downstream value chain partners. If the downstream processes use multiple types of inputs, companies should allocate emissions to the intermediate product sold by the reporting company. See chapter 8 of the Scope 3 Standard for guidance on allocation. Activity data needed For each type of sold intermediate product, companies should collect data on: •• The process(es) involved in transforming or processing sold intermediate products into an usable state final product, subsequent to sale by the reporting company •• •• Information needed for allocation (e.g., mass, economic value). Emission factors needed Companies should collect: •• Average emission factors for processing stages required to transform the sold intermediate product into a final product, expressed in units of emissions (e.g., CO2, CH4, N2O) per unit of product (e.g., kg CO2/kg of final product). (\\tt{e.9.,C O} _{2^{\ }}C H_{4{}^{\ }}N\_{2}O\\mathbb)\\nonumber Care should be taken when selecting secondary data sources to understand the boundaries of the data and whether any additional calculation is required to avoid double counting. Data collection guidance Data sources for activity data include: •• Purchasing records •• •• Internal data systems •• Industry-average data from associations or databases. •• Industry-average data from associations or databases. Calculation resources include: •• GHG Protocol Calculation Tool, “Stationary Combustion GHG Emissions Calculation Tool. Version 2.0. June 2009,” developed by World Resources Institute, available at [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools) •• Defra GHG Conversion Factors, developed by the UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), •• The GHG Protocol website ( [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools)) •• Companies or manufacturers •• Defra GHG Conversion Factors, developed by the UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), available at [www.defra.gov.uk/environment/business/reporting/conversion-factors.htm](http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/business/reporting/conversion-factors.htm). Data sources for emission factors include: * * * ## CATEGORY 10 Processing of Sold Products ## Calculation formula \[10.2\] Average-data method ## CO2e emissions from processing of sold intermediate products = ## sum across intermediate products: ∑ (mass of sold intermediate product (kg) × emission factor of processing of sold products (kg CO2e/kg of final product)) ## Example \[10.2\] Calculating emissions from processing of sold products using the average data method Company E is a producer of sugar and an exclusive supplier to Company F, which makes candy. Company F confirms with Company E that after sugar is purchased, there are further processes before the final candy product is produced. Company E collects industry average emission factors for the relevant processes. The information is summarized in the table below: ## Process Mass of sold intermediate Emission factor of processing ## product (kg) stages (kg CO2e/kg) Candy mixing, cooking, molding, 1,000 1.5 cooling, wrapping, and packaging Note: the activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. ## emissions from candy mixing and cooking process: ∑ (mass of sold intermediate product × emission factor of processing stages (kg CO2e/kg of final product)) = 1,000 × 1.5 = 1,500 kg CO2e _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[112\] * * * _**11**_ ### Category 11: Use of Sold Products _**Category description** his category includes emissions from the use of goods and services sold by the reporting_ #### company in the reporting year. A reporting company’s scope 3 emissions from use of _Tsold products include the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of end users. End users include_ #### both consumers and business customers that use final products. The Scope 3 Standard divides emissions from the use of sold products into two types (see also table 11.1): **••** Direct use-phase emissions **••** Indirect use-phase emissions. In category 11, companies are required to include direct use-phase emissions of sold products. Companies may also account for indirect use-phase emissions of sold products, and should do so when indirect use-phase emissions are expected to be significant. See table 11.1 for descriptions and examples of direct and indirect use-phase emissions. Category 11 includes the total expected lifetime emissions from all relevant products sold in the reporting year across the company’s product portfolio. (Refer to chapter 5.4 of the Scope 3 Standard for more information on the time boundary of scope 3 categories.) See box 11.1 in this chapter for an example of reporting product lifetime emissions and box 11.2 for guidance related to product lifetime and durability. The GHG Protocol Product Standard provides information on accounting for life cycle GHG emissions from individual products. Companies may optionally include emissions associated with maintenance of sold products during use. See section 5.6 of the Scope 3 Standard for guidance on the applicability of category 11 to final products and intermediate products sold by the reporting company. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[113\] * * * Table \[11.1\] Emissions from use of sold products | Type of Emissions | Product Type | Examples | | --- | --- | --- | | Direct use-phase emissions(required) | Products that directly consume energy(fuels or electricity) during use | Automobiles, aircraft, engines, motors, power plants, buildings, appliances, electronics, lighting,data centers, web-based software | | Fuels and feedstocks | Petroleum products, natural gas, coal, biofuels,and crude oil | | | Greenhouse gases and products that contain or form greenhouse gases that are emitted during use | CO2，CH4，N2O，HFCs，PFCs，SF6，refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment，industrial gases，fire extinguishers，fertilizers | | | Indirect use-phase emissions(optional) | Products that indirectly consume energy(fuels or electricity) during use | Apparel (requires washing and drying)，food(requires cooking and refrigeration)，pots and pans(require heating)，and soaps and detergents(require heated water) | C O\_{2}C\_N{ _{2}}N_{2}H\_{2S3}P F\_S{S3}\_{2}, Source: Table 5.8 from the Scope 3 Standard. Calculating emissions from category 11 typically requires product design specifications and assumptions about how consumers use products (e.g., use profiles, assumed product lifetimes). Companies are required to report a description of the methodologies and assumptions used to calculate emissions (see chapter 11 of the Scope 3 Standard). Where relevant, companies should report additional information on product performance when reporting scope 3 emissions to provide additional transparency on steps companies are taking to reduce GHG emissions from sold products. Such information may include GHG intensity metrics, energy intensity metrics, and annual emissions from the use of sold products (see section 11.3 of the Scope 3 Standard). See section 9.3 of the Scope 3 Standard for guidance on recalculating base year emissions when methodologies or assumptions related to category 11 change over time. Any claims of avoided emissions related to a company’s sold products must be reported separately from the company’s scope 1, scope 2, and scope 3 inventories. (For more information, see section 9.5 of the Scope 3 Standard) An automaker sells 1 million cars in 2010. Each car has an expected lifetime of 10 years. The company reports the anticipated use-phase emissions of the 1 million cars it sold in 2010 over their 10-year expected lifetime. The company also reports corporate average fuel economy (km per liter) and corporate average emissions (kg CO2e/km) as relevant emissions-intensity metrics. Box \[11.1\] Example of reporting product lifetime emissions .C,((e k m m) Source: Box 5.7 from the Scope 3 Standard. * * * ## CATEGORY 11 Use of Sold Products ## Box \[11.2\] Product lifetime and durability Because the scope 3 inventory accounts for total lifetime emissions of sold products, companies that produce more durable products with longer lifetimes could appear to be penalized because, as product lifetimes increase, scope 3 emissions increase, assuming all else is constant. To reduce the potential for emissions data to be misinterpreted, companies should also report relevant information such as product lifetimes and emissions intensity metrics to demonstrate product performance over time. Relevant emissions intensity metrics may include annual emissions per product, energy efficiency per product, emissions per hour of use, emissions per kilometer driven, emissions per functional unit, etc. Source: Box 5.8 from the Scope 3 Standard. This section provides guidance of the following: **••** What should be included in the emissions from use of sold products **••** Guidance on what to include in a use profile **••** Reporting guidance **••** Guidance on how to assess uncertainty on the product’s use profile. # Calculating emissions from use of sold products This guidance provides calculation methods to calculate a company’s: **••** Direct use-phase emissions **••** Indirect use-phase emissions. # Calculation methods for direct use-phase emissions Companies should first determine in which categories their products belong. The following products have direct-use phase emissions: **•• Products that directly consume energy (fuels or electricity) during use: involves breaking down the use phase,** measuring emissions per product, and aggregating emissions **•• Fuels and feedstocks: involves collecting fuel use data and multiplying them by representative fuel emission** factors **•• Greenhouse gases and products that contain or form greenhouse gases that are emitted during use: involves** collecting data on the GHG contained in the product and multiplying them by the percent of GHGs released and GHG emission factors. If a company sells a large selection of products, or if the use phase of multiple products is similar, it may choose to group similar products and use average statistics for a typical product in the product group. For example, a fast-moving consumer goods company selling carbonated drinks may decide to group products by packaging types and treat all products within that group with the same use profile. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[115\] * * * ## CATEGORY 11 Use of Sold Products ## Calculation method for direct use-phase emissions from products that directly consume energy ## (fuels or electricity) during use In this method, the company multiplies the lifetime number of uses of each product by the amount sold and an emission factor per use. Companies should then aggregate use-phase emissions of all products. ## Activity data needed **••** Total lifetime expected uses of product(s) **••** Quantities of products sold **••** Fuel used per use of product **••** Electricity consumption per use of product **••** Refrigerant leakage per use of product. ## Emission factors needed **••** Life cycle emission factors for fuels **••** Life cycle emission factors for electricity **••** Global warming potential of refrigerants. ## Data collection guidance **••** Data sources for activity data include: **••** Internal data systems **••** Sales records **••** Surveys **••** Industry associations. ## Data sources for emission factors include: **••** The GHG Protocol website ( [www.ghgprotocol.org](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/)) **••** Life cycle databases **••** Company or supplier developed emission factors **••** Industry associations. It is important to consider the region where products are used, especially if the product consumes electricity because electricity grid emission factors can vary significantly. If its product is used globally, a company may consider using a global average electricity emission factor but estimating product use at a more granular level (either regional or national) and applying regional or national electricity grid emission factors would result in more accurate emissions estimates for this category. Scenario uncertainty can also be helpful here. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[116\] * * * Calculation formula \[11.1\] Direct use-phase emissions from products that directly consume energy (fuels or electricity) during use CO2e emissions from use of sold products = sum across refrigerant leakage from use of products: ∑ (total lifetime expected uses of product × number sold in reporting period × refrigerant leakage per use (kg) × global warming potential (kg CO2e/kg)) Example \[11.1\] Calculating direct use-phase emissions from products that directly consume energy (fuels or electricity) during use Company A is a manufacturer of electrical appliances such as washing machines and irons. It collects sales records of quantities sold as well as average lifetime uses for each of its products. It sources data on electricity consumed per use from industry reports and electricity emission factors from government data. The results are summarized in the table below: | 产品 | Total uses over lifetime | Number sold | Electricity consumed per use(kWh) | Electricity emission factor(kgCO2e/kWh) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Washing machine X100 | 1,000 | 11,500 | 1.3 | 0.5 | | Washing machine X200 | 1,100 | 1,900 | 1.5 | 0.5 | | Iron Y123 | 2,000 | 20,000 | 0.2 | 0.5 | Note: The activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. * * * ## CATEGORY 11 Use of Sold Products ## Example \[11.1\] Calculating direct use-phase emissions from products that directly consume energy (fuels or ## electricity) during use (continued) ## Emissions for each product are calculated using the following formula: ∑ (total lifetime expected uses of product × number sold in reporting period × electricity consumed per use (kWh) × emission factor for electricity (kg CO2e/kWh)) ## Washing machine X100: = 1,000 × 11,500 × 1.3 × 0.5 = 7,475,000 kg CO2e ## Washing machine X200: = 1,100 × 1,900 × 1.5 × 0.5 = 1,567,500 kg CO2e ## Iron Y123: = 2,000 × 20,000 × 0.2 × 0.5 = 4,000,000 kg CO2e ## total emissions from use of sold products = emissions from X100 + emissions from X200 + emissions from Y123 = 7,475,000 + 1,567,500 + 4,000,000 = 13,042,500 kg CO2e ## Calculation method for direct use-phase emissions from fuels and feedstocks Feedstock refers to starting materials that are used to make fuels, power and/or products. These may include biomass for producing power, crops for producing biofuels, or crude oil for producing plastic products. If the reporting company is a producer of fuels and/or feedstocks, the use-phase emissions are calculated by multiplying the quantities of fuels/ feedstocks by the combustion emission factors for the fuels/feedstocks. If the feedstock is not combusted during the use phase, no emissions should be calculated. Note that only the combustion emissions should be reported in this category, not the upstream emissions associated with the feedstock/fuel. This method avoids double counting as the upstream emissions associated with the production of the feedstock/fuel were already included in the reporting company’s scope 1 and scope 2, as well as other scope 3 categories. ## Activity data needed **••** Total quantities of fuels/feedstocks sold. ## Emission factors needed **••** Combustion emission factors of fuel/feedstock. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[118\] * * * ## CATEGORY 11 Use of Sold Products ## Data collection guidance Combustion emission factors for fuel/feedstock are well documented by many internationally recognized sources such as the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report and those factors included in the GHG Protocol calculation tools. In practice, the emissions vary between applications and countries based on the following: ## •• Technology: the completeness of combustion may vary from application to application **•• Exact fuel mix: the precise fuel mix may vary from region to region and company to company; for example, the** types of aromatic hydrocarbon mixed with gasoline may alter the combustion emissions. Because of this variation companies should use the most representative emission factors for their fuel. ## Calculation formula 11.2: Direct use-phase emissions from combusted fuels and feedstocks ## CO2e emissions from fuel = ## sum across fuels/feedstocks: ∑ (total quantity of fuel/feedstock sold (e.g., kWh) × combustion emission factor for fuel/feedstock (e.g., kg CO2e/kWh)) ## Calculation method for direct use-phase emissions from greenhouse gases and products that contain or ## form greenhouse gases that are emitted during use Some products may contain GHGs which are emitted during use or at the end of the product’s useful life (e.g. products that contain refrigerents). If the reporting company is a producer of products containing GHGs, use-phase emissions are calculated by multiplying the quantities of products sold by the percentage of GHGs released per unit of GHG contained in the product and by the global warming potential (GWP) of the greenhouse gases released. ## Activity data needed **••** Total quantities of products sold **••** Quantities of GHGs contained per product **••** Percentage of GHGs released throughout the lifetime of the product. ## Emission factors needed **••** GWP of the GHGs contained in the product, expressed in units of carbon dioxide per unit kilogram of the GHG (e.g., 25 kg CO2e/kg) Note: If different GHGs are released by the product, the total carbon dioxide equivalent should be reported and the breakdown of GHGs (e.g., CO2, CH4, N2O) may be reported separately (see chapter 8 of the Scope 3 Standard). The company should first account for all the different types of GHGs contained in a product, then aggregate for all products. If the use phase of a product is likely to be similar for multiple products, companies may group similar products. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[119\] * * * ## CATEGORY 11 Use of Sold Products ## Calculation formula \[11.3\] Direct use-phase emissions from greenhouse gases and products that contain or ## form greenhouse gases that are emitted during use ## CO2e emissions from greenhouse gases and products that contain or form greenhouse gases ## that are emitted during use = ## sum across GHGs released in a product or product group: ∑ (GHG contained per product × Total Number of products sold × % of GHG released during lifetime use of product × GWP of the GHG) **then:** sum across products or product groups: ∑ (use phase emissions from product or product group 1,2,3…) Note: if the % released is unknown 100% should be assumed. # Calculation methods for indirect use-phase emissions ## Calculation method for indirect use-phase emissions from products that indirectly consume energy (fuels or ## electricity) during use For products that indirectly consume energy or emit GHGs (see table 11.1), the reporting company should calculate emissions by creating or obtaining a typical use-phase profile over the lifetime of the product and multiplying by relevant emission factors. ## Activity data needed **••** Average number of uses over lifetime of product **••** Average use scenarios (e.g., weighted average of scenarios) **••** Fuel consumed in use scenarios **••** Electricity consumed in use scenarios **••** Refrigerant leakage in use scenarios **••** GHGs emitted indirectly in use scenarios. ## Emission factors needed **••** Combustion emission factors of fuels and electricity. Ideally agreement should be reached by a sector (e.g., industry associations and trade bodies) on common rules for use- phase assumptions. These assumptions can then be verified by an independent third party to improve consistency and comparability. The emission factors applied should be representative of the geography of where the product is sold as well as the reporting year. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[120\] * * * ## CATEGORY 11 Use of Sold Products ## Data collection guidance The generation of a typical use phase may be difficult because the same product may consume more or less energy depending on the conditions in which it is used. For example, a potato may be roasted, boiled, or microwaved, each cooking method using a different amount of energy and thus producing different levels of emissions. Therefore, it is important to generate a use profile that is representative of use scenarios over the lifetime of the product by the intended consumer population. These may come from sources such as: **••** Industry recognized benchmark testing specifications **••** Product category rules **••** Previous emissions studies **••** Consumer studies. Companies may choose to identify several different use-phase scenarios for a product and create a weighted average based upon actual activity. ## Calculation formula \[11.4\] Indirect use-phase emissions from products that indirectly consume energy ## (fuels or electricity) during use ## Indirect use-phase CO2e emissions of products = ## sum across fuels consumed from use scenarios: ∑ (total lifetime expected uses of product × % of total lifetime uses using this scenario × number sold in reporting period × fuel consumed per use in this scenario (e.g., kWh) × emission factor for fuel (e.g., kg CO2e/kWh)) + **sum across electricity consumed from use scenarios:** ∑ (total lifetime expected uses of product × % of total lifetime uses using this scenario × number sold in reporting period × electricity consumed per use in this scenario (kWh) × emission factor for electricity (kg CO2e/kWh)) + **sum across refrigerant leakage from use scenarios:** ∑ (total lifetime expected uses of product × % of total lifetime uses using this scenario × number sold in reporting period × refrigerant leakage per use in this scenario (kg) × emission factor for refrigerant (kg CO2e/kg)) + **sum across GHG emitted indirectly from use scenarios:** ∑ (total lifetime expected uses of product × % of total lifetime uses using this scenario × number sold in reporting period × GHG emitted indirectly (kg) × GWP of the GHG) _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[121\] * * * Example \[11.2\] Calculating indirect use-phase emissions from products that indirectly consume energy (fuels or electricity) during use Company A produces laundry soap, which indirectly entails consumption of electricity during the use phase. Company A collects data from consumer journals regarding the average consumer behavior in washing clothes and obtains average electricity emission factors from life cycle databases. The data is summarized in the table below: | Usage temperature setting | Lifetime uses per product (washes) | Consumers using temperature setting(percent) | Products sold | Electricity consumed per use(kWh) | Emission factor(kgCO2e/kWh) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 30℃ cotton wash | 1,000 | 20 | 2,000 | 0.40 | 0.5 | | 40℃ cotton wash | 40 | 0.50 | 0.5 | | | | 90℃ cotton wash | 40 | 1.20 | 0.5 | | | Note: The activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. emissions for each use phase scenario is calculated as follows: ∑ (total lifetime expected uses of product × % of total lifetime uses using this scenario ∑ (total lifetime expected uses of product × % of total lifetime uses using this scenario × number sold in reporting period × electricity consumed per use in this scenario (kWh) × emission factor for electricity (kg CO2e/kWh)) 30^{\\circ}C c00o m o s s11.000\\times0.2\\times2.000\\times0.4\\times0.5=80.000k g0C o\_{2}e 40^{\\circ}C\\mathsf{C O t t o n}a5i1,000\\times0.4\\times2,000\\times0.5\\times0.5=200.000\ g\\mathrm{C O}\_{2}e total emissions from use of sold products = emissions from 30°C + emissions from 40°C + emissions from 90°C = 80,000 + 200,000 + 480,000 = 760,000 kg CO2e 30^{\\circ}\\mathbb{C} 40^{\\circ}\\mathbb{C}+{} \\mathrm{{C O}\_{2}e} * * * ## CATEGORY 11 Use of Sold Products ## Calculation method for sold intermediate products When a company sells an intermediate product that directly emits GHGs in its use phase, it is required to account for direct use-phase emissions of the intermediate product by the end user, (i.e., emissions resulting from: the use of the sold intermediate product that directly consumes fuel or electricity during use; fuels and feedstocks; GHGs released during product use). Companies may optionally include the indirect use-phase emissions of sold intermediate products. In certain cases, the eventual end use of sold intermediate products may be unknown. For example, a company may produce an intermediate product with many potential downstream applications, each of which has a different GHG emissions profile and be unable to reasonably estimate the downstream emissions associated with the various possible end uses. In such a case, companies may disclose and justify the exclusion of all downstream emissions related to sold intermediate products. For more information, see section 6.4 of the Scope 3 Standard (Accounting for downstream emissions). ## Activity data needed **••** Type(s) of final product(s) produced from reporting company’s intermediate product(s) **••** Percentage of reporting company’s intermediate product sales going to each type of final product **••** Activity data required to calculate the use-phase emission of the final product will be the same as described previously in this chapter. ## Emission factors needed **••** Depending on the type of final product, emission factors required will be the same as described earlier in this chapter. ## Calculation formula \[11.5\] Use-phase emissions from sold intermediate products ## Use-phase CO2e emissions of sold intermediate products = ## sum across sold intermediate products total use phase emissions: ∑ (total intermediate products sold × total lifetime uses of final sold product × emissions per use of sold intermediate product (kg CO2e/use)) _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[123\] * * * ## CATEGORY 11 Use of Sold Products ## Example \[11.3\] Calculating use-phase emissions from sold intermediate products Company A manufactures engines used in airplanes. It sold 10 engines to an airplane manufacturer. _**Number Weight of Weight of Total lifetime uses Emissions per use**_ _**of engines each airplane each engine of final products of final product**_ _**sold (tonnes) (tonnes) (km flown by airplane) (kg CO2e/km flown)**_ 10 500 20 300,000 0.3 Note: The activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data ## Company A works out the direct use-phase emissions of its sold engines as follows: total use phase emissions = ∑ (total intermediate products sold × total lifetime uses of final sold product × emissions per use of sold intermediate product (kg CO2e/use) × (weight of engine / weight of airplane)) = (10 × 300,000 × 0.3 × ( 500 20 )) = 36,000 kg CO2 e In this example, physical allocation is most suitable. The allocation is based on the weight of the engine as a proportion of the total weight of the airplane. For allocation rules refer to section 8 of the Scope 3 Standard. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[124\] * * * _**12**_ ### Category 12: End-of-Life Treatment ### of Sold Products #### Category description ategory 12 includes emissions from the waste disposal and treatment of products _sold by the reporting company (in the reporting year) at the end of their life. This_ # Ccategory includes the total expected end-of-life emissions from all products sold in _the reporting year. (See section 5.4 of the Scope 3 Standard for more information on the time_ #### boundary of scope 3 categories.) End-of-life treatment methods (e.g., landfilling, incineration, and recycling) are described in category 5 (Waste generated in operations) and apply to both category 5 and category 12. Calculating emissions from category 12 requires assumptions about the end-of-life treatment methods used by consumers. Companies are required to report a description of the methodologies and assumptions used to calculate emissions (see chapter 11 of the Scope 3 Standard). For sold intermediate products, companies should account for the emissions from disposing of the intermediate product at the end of its life, not the final product. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[125\] * * * ## CATEGORY 12 End-of-Life Treatment of Sold Products # Calculating emissions from end-of-life treatment of sold products The emissions from downstream end-of-life treatment of sold products should follow the calculation methods in category 5 (Waste generated in operations), with the difference that instead of collecting data on total mass of waste generated in operations, companies should collect data on total mass of sold products (and packaging) from the point of sale by the reporting company through the end of life after use by consumers. The major difference between calculating upstream and downstream emissions of waste treatment is likely to be the availability and quality of waste activity data. Whereas the reporting company is likely have specific waste type and waste treatment data from its own operations, this information is likely to be more difficult to obtain for sold products. Although the reporting company may know the product’s components, it may not know how the waste-disposal behavior of consumers and retailers varies across geographic regions. If the reporting company sells intermediate products, it is required to account for emissions from disposing of the sold intermediate products at the end of their life. ## Activity data needed Companies should collect: **••** Total mass of sold products and packaging from the point of sale by the reporting company to the end-of-life after consumer use (e.g., packaging used to transport products through to the point of retail and any packaging that is disposed of prior to the end-of-life of the final product **••** Proportion of this waste being treated by different methods (e.g., percent landfilled, incinerated, recycled). ## Emission factors needed Companies should collect: **••** Average waste-treatment specific-emission factors based on all waste treatment types. ## Data collection guidance When collecting data on total waste produced, the reporting company should collect data on the waste type(s) and amounts after it sells the products through to the end-of-life disposal by consumers. This data should include any packaging and product waste. For food and drink items, companies should refer to average proportion of food/drinks wasted. In many cases, total waste will be equal to the total products sold in reporting year. However, if the product is actually consumed (e.g., food and drink) the total waste is likely to be lower, and in other cases, such as products combusted to generate energy, could even be zero. When collecting data on the proportion of waste treated by different methods, companies may refer to: **••** Company’s own research and internal data on how its products are treated after consumption **••** Specific government directives on waste treatment of certain products (e.g., the European Union’s “Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive”) **••** Industry associations or organizations that have conducted research into consumer disposal patterns of specific products **••** Average data on waste treatment from the point that the products are sold by the reporting company through to the end of life after consumer use. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[126\] * * * Calculation resources include: •• The European Union publishes data on average end-of-life treatment scenarios of different product groups in EU member countries (see [http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/waste/introduction/](http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/waste/introduction/)) •• The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency also publishes data on waste generation, recycling, and disposal statistics, •• The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency also publishes data on waste generation, recycling, and disposal statistics, available at: [http://www.epa.gov/osw/nonhaz/municipal/msw99.htm](http://www.epa.gov/osw/nonhaz/municipal/msw99.htm) •• •• Waste Resources and Action Programme (WRAP) publishes average food and drinks waste as a proportion of purchased amount in the UK economy, which may be used in the absence of product-specific data (see [http://www](http://www/). wrap.org.uk/retail\_supply\_chain/research\_tools/research/report\_household.html). Calculation formula \[12.1\] Waste-type-specific method CO2e emissions from end-of-life treatment of sold products = sum across waste treatment methods: ∑ (total mass of sold products and packaging from point of sale to end of life after consumer use (kg) ∑ (total mass of sold products and packaging from point of sale to end of life after consumer use (kg) × % of total waste being treated by waste treatment method × emission factor of waste treatment method (kg CO2e/kg)) Example \[12.1\] Calculating emissions from the end-of-life treatment of sold products Company A sells paper that is laminated in a way that does not allow recycling. In the reporting period, Company A sold 10,000 tonnes of product. The company conducts consumer research to understand the disposal methods used by end consumers. The company also collects data for emission factors associated with each of the disposal methods for laminated paper products from a life cycle assessment database: Note: The activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. | Mass of waste after consumer use(kg) | Waste treatment | Proportion of waste produced(percent) | Emission factor of waste treatment method(kgCO2e/kg) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 10,000 | Landfill | 90 | 0.3 | | Incinerated | 10 | 1.0 | | | Recycled | 0 | 0.0 | | =(\\uparrow0,000\\times909\\times0.3)+(\\uparrow0,000\\times1096\\times1)+(\\uparrow0,000\\times0.56\\times0)=3,700\ \\mathrm{k g}\\subset\\mathbb{O} _{perp\\mathrm{e g}}\\times\\mathbb{O}_{\\perp}\\times\\mathbb{O}\_{\\perp{\\mathrm{e}}} * * * _**13**_ ### Category 13: Downstream Leased Assets _**Category description** his category includes emissions from the operation of assets that are owned by the_ #### reporting company (acting as lessor) and leased to other entities in the reporting _Tyear that are not already included in scope 1 or scope 2. This category is applicable to_ #### lessors (i.e., companies that receive payments from lessees). Companies that operate leased #### assets (i.e., lessees) should refer to category 8 (Upstream leased assets). Leased assets may be included in a company’s scope 1 or scope 2 inventory depending on the type of lease and the consolidation approach the company uses to define its organizational boundaries. (See section 5.2 of the Scope 3 _Standard for more information.) If the reporting company leases an asset for only part of the reporting year, the_ reporting company should account for emissions from the portion of the year that the asset was leased. See Appendix A of the Scope 3 Standard for more information on accounting for emissions from leased assets. In some cases, companies may not find value in distinguishing between products sold to customers (accounted for in category 11) and products leased to customers (accounted for in category 13). A company may account for products leased to customers in the same way it accounts for products sold to customers (i.e., by accounting for the total expected lifetime emissions from all relevant products leased to other entities in the reporting year). Companies should report emissions from leased products in category 11 (Use of sold products), rather than category 13 (Downstream leased assets) and avoid double counting between categories. A reporting company’s scope 3 emissions from downstream leased assets include the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of lessees (depending on the lessee’s consolidation approach). _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[128\] * * * ## CATEGORY 13 Downstream Leased Assets # Calculating emissions from leased assets Downstream leased assets differ from upstream leased assets in that the leased assets are owned by the reporting company. The availability and access to information depends on the type of asset leased. For example, a company that leases vehicles may need to request fuel or mileage data from lessees in order to calculate emissions. The calculation methods for upstream and downstream leased assets do not differ. For guidance on calculating emissions from category 13 (Downstream leased assets), refer to the guidance for category 8 (Upstream leased assets). Companies requesting scope 1 and scope 2 data from lessees using the asset-specific method in category 8 (Upstream leased assets) may need to request additional information from the lessee in order to properly allocate emissions to the reporting company’s leased assets. The lessee’s scope 1 and scope 2 emissions data maybe aggregated, as with buildings without sub-metering. The reporting company may need to allocate these emissions in order to calculate emissions from this category. For guidance on collecting data and allocating emissions, refer to chapter 7 and chapter 8 of the Scope 3 Standard. ## Example \[13.1\] Calculating the emissions from downstream leased assets Company C (lessor) leases out a factory (factory 1) to Company D. Company D (lessee) knows its aggregated corporate scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of both factory 1 and a separate unit it operates, Factory 2. For company C to determine emissions associated with factory 1, it must allocate total emissions from both factories. It chooses to allocate based on physical allocation (i.e., floor space). The floor space of factory 1 is 5,000 m2 and factory 2 is 10,000 m2. The data is summarized in the table below: ## Combined scope 1 and scope 2 emissions Floor space (m2) ## (kg CO2e) Factory 1 5,000 9,000 Factory 2 10,000 Note: The activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data ## The emissions of company C’s (lessor) downstream leased asset is calculated as follows: ∑ scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of lessee (kg CO2e) physical area of the leased asset (e.g., area, volume) × total physical area of lessor assets (e.g., area, volume) = 9,000 × (5,000 / 15,000) = 3,000 kg CO2e _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[129\] * * * _**14**_ ### Category 14: Franchises #### Category description ategory 14 includes emissions from the operation of franchises not included in scope _1 or scope 2. A franchise is a business operating under a license to sell or distribute_ # Canother company’s goods or services within a certain location. This category is #### applicable to franchisors (i.e., companies that grant licenses to other entities to sell or distribute _its goods or services in return for payments, such as royalties for the use of trademarks and_ #### other services). Franchisors should account for emissions that occur from the operation of #### franchises (i.e., the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of franchisees) in this category. Franchisees (i.e., companies that operate franchises and pay fees to a franchisor) should include emissions from operations under their control in this category if they have not included those emissions in scope 1 and scope 2 due to their choice of consolidation approach. Franchisees may optionally report upstream scope 3 emissions associated with the franchisor’s operations (i.e., the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of the franchisor) in category 1 (Purchased goods and services). #### Calculating emissions from franchises Companies may use either of two methods to calculate emissions from franchises: **•• Franchise-specific method, which involves collecting site-specific activity data or scope 1 and scope 2 emissions** data from franchisees **•• Average-data method, which involves estimating emissions for each franchise, or groups of franchises, based on** average statistics, such as average emissions per franchise type or floor space. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[130\] * * * Franchise-specific method The franchise-specific method involves collecting scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from franchisees. If franchisees have conducted corporate scope 1 and scope 2 GHG inventory report(s), the data can be applied immediately. If such reports are not available, site-specific fuel and energy data from individual franchises should be collected. The reporting company should determine whether the franchisee delivers business solely for the reporting company (i.e., franchisor), and if not, the franchisee or the reporting company should allocate the emissions accordingly. Guidance on allocation is provided in chapter 8 of the Scope 3 Standard. If significant upstream emissions result from the purchase of goods and services by franchisees, the franchisor developing the scope 3 inventory should include these emissions in this category. For example, a large fast-food franchise should account for the upstream emissions associated with the beef purchased by its franchise restaurants. Activity data needed Companies should collect data on either: •• Scope 1, scope 2, and (optionally) scope 3 emissions data from franchisees •• Site-specific fuel use, electricity use, and process and fugitive emissions activity data if applicable. •• Site-specific fuel use, electricity use, and process and fugitive emissions activity data if applicable. Emission factors needed If collecting fuel and energy data, companies should also collect: •• Site- or regionally-specific emission factors for energy sources (e.g., electricity and fuels) per unit of consumption (e.g., kg CO2e/kWh for electricity, kg CO2e/liter for diesel) •• Emission factors of process emissions and fugitive emissions (e.g., refrigeration and air conditioning) C O\_{2}e/k W •• Emission factors of process emissions and fugitive emissions (e.g., refrigeration and air conditioning) •• Upstream emission factors. •• Upstream emission factors. Data collection guidance •• •• Data sources for activity data include: •• Public GHG inventory reports accessible through GHG reporting programs •• Public GHG inventory reports accessible through GHG reporting programs •• Utility bills •• Government agencies (e.g., Defra provides emission factors for the United Kingdom) •• For activity data, emission factors, and formulas for process and fugitive emissions, see the GHG Protocol website Data sources for emission factors include: •• Company-specific emission factors •• Industry associations •• The GHG Protocol websites ( [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools) and [http://www.ghgprotocol](http://www.ghgprotocol/). org/standards/scope-3-standard) •• Company-specific emission factors •• For activity data, emission factors, and formulas for process and fugitive emissions, see the GHG Protocol website ( [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools)) and the IPCC 2006 Guidelines ( [http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges](http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges/). or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html). •• Internal IT systems. * * * To calculate scope 3 emissions from franchises, aggregate the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of all franchises, using the formula above. Franchises that operate in a portion of a building where energy use is not separately sub-metered may estimate energy consumed using the franchise’s share of the building’s total floor space and total building energy use, following this formula: Calculation formula \[14.2\] Allocating emissions from franchise buildings that are not sub-metered | $CO\_{2e emissions allocated to franchise = | | | --- | --- | | energy use from franchise (kWh) | | | franchise's area(m^{2}$) | | | building's total area(m^{2})\\times building's occupancy rate(e.g.,0.75) | $\\times$ building's total energy use(kWh) | Using Samples If a company has a large number of individual franchises, it may not be practical to collect data from each franchise. •• Location, (e.g., country – particularly if electricity emission factors differ significantly among countries) •• Building type (e.g., free-standing buildings; leased shop space in shopping centres; shop-front at base of a larger city Companies may also choose to categorize franchises into similar groups for data collection. The grouping strategy should group franchises with similar anticipated emissions intensities. Below is a non-exclusive list of possible ways to group franchises: •• Floor space •• •• Customer numbers •• Product volume •• Customer numbers •• Distinctive characteristics (e.g., gyms with saunas, hotels with pools). * * * Calculation formula \[14.3\] Extrapolating emissions from sample groups | $CO\_{2e emissions from franchises = | | --- | | Step 1: aggregation of franchise emissions per group: | | total emissions from sampled franchises within group | | $\\times \\frac{\\text{total number of franchisees within group}}{\\text{number of franchisees sampled within group}}$ | | Step 2: aggregation of total franchise emissions across all groups: | | $\\sum$ total scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from each asset group | Step 2: aggregation of total franchise emissions across all groups: ∑ total scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from each asset group Companies that extrapolate from a representative sample within a franchise group should use the formula 14.2 to calculate emissions from sampled franchises within a group, then apply the formula in Step 1 above to estimate emissions for a franchise group. Companies should then use the formula in Step 2 above to aggregate franchise groups to the company’s total emissions from franchises. Example \[14.1\] Calculating the emissions from franchises using the franchise-specific method Company A has multiple franchisees that operate restaurants. Company A requests the total scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of each of the franchisees: | Franchisee | Scope 1 emissions(kgCO2e) | Scope 2 emissions(kgCO2e) | | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | 100,000 | 20,000 | | 2 | 25,000 | 10,000 | | 3 | 30,000 | 10,000 | | 4 | 90,000 | 30,000 | | 5 | 30,000 | 10,000 | company A can then perform the following calculation: ∑ total scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from franchisees (kg CO2 Note: emissions are for illustrative purposes only, and do not refer to actual data. \\begin{array}{c}{ * * * Average-data method The average-data approach involves estimating emissions for each franchise, or groups of franchises, based on average statistics, such as average emissions per building type, floor space, or franchise type. This approach should be used when purchase records, electricity bills, or meter readings of fuel or energy use are not available or applicable. Approaches include: •• Estimated emissions based on occupied floor space by building type •• Estimated emissions based on number and type of franchises. •• Estimated emissions based on number and type of franchises. Note that the average-data approach may be relatively inaccurate and limits the ability of companies to track performance of GHG reduction actions. Activity data needed •• Floor space of each franchise, by floor space •• Number of franchises, by building type •• Number of franchises, by building type •• Number of franchise assets that give rise to GHG emissions (e.g., company cars, trucks). •• Number of franchise assets that give rise to GHG emissions (e.g., company cars, trucks). Emission factors needed Depending on the type of asset that is leased companies may need to collect: Depending on the type of asset that is leased companies may need to collect: •• Average emission factors by floor space, expressed in units of emissions per area per time period (e.g., kg CO2e/m2/day) •• Average emission factors by building type, expressed in units of emissions per building per time period (e.g., kg CO2e/small office block/year) •• Emission factors by asset type, expressed in units of emissions per asset type per time period (e.g., kg CO2 •• Emission factors by asset type, expressed in units of emissions per asset type per time period (e.g., kg CO2e/car/year). Calculation formula \[14.4\] Average data method for leased buildings (if floor space data is available) Data sources for emission factors include: •• Industry bodies (e.g., building industry) •• National statistics published by government agencies •• National statistics published by government agencies •• •• The U.S. Energy Information Administration dataset on average energy use by building type, Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey, at: [http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs](http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs). * * * Calculation formula \[14.5\]verage data method for other asset types or for leased buildings where floor A space data is not available | $CO\_{2e emissions from franchises= | | --- | | sum across building/asset types： | | $\\sum$ (number of buildings or assets | | × average emissions per building or asset type per year(kg $CO\_{2}$ e/building or asset type/year)) | Example 14.2: Calculating the emissions from franchises using the average data method Company A has multiple franchisees that operate a combination of food outlets and clothing outlets. To calculate emissions from franchises, Company A collects the following data: | Franchisee | Type | Shop area(m2) | Emission factor(kgCO2e/m2/year) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | Food outlet | 100 | 30,000 | | 2 | Food outlet | 150 | 30,000 | | 3 | Clothing outlet | 400 | 10,000 | | 4 | Clothing outlet | 700 | 10,000 | | 5 | Clothing outlet | 500 | 10,000 | Note that all emissions factors are used for illustrative purposes only Company A can then perform the following calculation: \\begin{array}{c}{{\\mathrm{s r i n t o o o ~~r r r o t e r ~~s t a c t i s e s}}}\ {{=\\Sigma(\\mathrm{{b o i d d i n g~~ o r~o y e r~~ o v e r t o g e ~~}}{\\mathrm{s r o n~~ r ~~}}{\\mathrm{s r o n~~ r ~~}}{\\mathrm{s r o n~~ * * * _**15**_ ### Category 15: Investments #### Category description his category includes scope 3 emissions associated with the reporting company’s #### investments in the reporting year, not already included in scope 1 or scope 2. # TThis category is applicable to investors (i.e., companies that make an investment #### with the objective of making a profit) and companies that provide financial services. This #### category also applies to investors that are not profit driven (e.g. multilateral development #### banks), and the same calculation methods should be used. Investments are categorized as _a downstream scope 3 category because providing capital or financing is a service provided by the reporting company._ Category 15 is designed primarily for private financial institutions (e.g., commercial banks), but is also relevant to public financial institutions (e.g., multilateral development banks, export credit agencies) and other entities with investments not included in scope 1 and scope 2. Investments may be included in a company’s scope 1 or scope 2 inventory depending on how the company defines its organizational boundaries. For example, companies that use the equity-share approach include emissions from equity investments in scope 1 and scope 2. Companies that use a control approach account only for those equity investments that are under the company’s control in scope 1 and scope 2. Investments not included in the company’s scope 1 or scope 2 emissions are included in scope 3, in this category. A reporting company’s scope 3 emissions from investments are the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of investees. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[136\] * * * For purposes of GHG accounting, this standard divides financial investments into four types: •• Equity investments •• •• Debt investments •• Project finance •• Managed investments and client services. Tables 15.1 and 15.2 provide GHG accounting guidance for each type of financial investment. Table 15.1 provides the types of investments required to be accounted for in this category. Table 15.2 identifies types of investments that companies may optionally report. Emissions from investments should be allocated to the reporting company based on the reporting company’s proportional share of investment in the investee. Because investment portfolios are dynamic and can change frequently throughout the reporting year, companies should identify investments by choosing a fixed point in time, such as December 31 of the reporting year, or by using a representative average over the course of the reporting year. Table \[15.1\] Accounting for emissions from investments (required) | Financial investment/service | Description | GHG accounting approach(required) | | --- | --- | --- | | Equity investments | Equity investments made by the reporting company using the company's own capital and balance sheet, including: | In general, companies in the financial services sector should account for emissions from equity investments in scope 1 and scope 2 by using the equity share consolidation approach to obtain representative scope 1 and scope 2 inventories.If emissions from equity investments are not included in scope 1 or scope 2(because the reporting company uses either the operational control or financial control consolidation approach and does not have control over the investee),account for proportional scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of equity investments\* that occur in the reporting year in scope 3,category 15(Investments). | | Equity investments in associates companies (or affiliated companies),where the reporting company has significant influence but not financial control (typically 20-50 percent ownership)Equity investments in joint ventures(non-incorporated joint ventures/partnerships/operations),where partners have joint financial control | | | | | Equity investments made by the reporting company using the company's own capital and balance sheet,where the reporting company has neither financial control nor significant influence over the emitting entity(and typically has less than 20 percent ownership). | If not included in the reporting company's scope 1 and scope 2 inventories:Account for proportional scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of equity investments\* that occur in the reporting year in scope 3,category 15(Investments).Companies may establish a threshold(e.g.,equity share of 1 percent) below which the company excludes equity investments from the inventory,if disclosed and justified. | * * * Table \[15.1\] Accounting for emissions from investments (required) (continued) | Financial investment/service | Description | GHG accounting approach(required) | | --- | --- | --- | | Debt investments(with known use of proceeds) | Corporate debt holdings held in the reporting company's portfolio, including corporate debt instruments(such as bonds or convertible bonds prior to conversion)or commercial loans,withknown use of proceeds(i.e.,where the use of proceeds is identified as going to a particular project,such as to build a specific power plant) | For each year during the term of the investment,companies should account forproportional scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of relevant projects _that occur in the reporting year in scope 3,category 15(Investments).In addition,if the reporting company is an initial sponsor or lender of a project:Also account for thetotal projected lifetime scope 1and scope 2 emissions of relevant projects_ financed during the reporting year and report those emissions separately from scope 3. | | Project finance | Long-term financing of projects(e.g.,infrastructure and industrial projects)by the reporting company as either an equity investor(sponsor)or debt investor(financier) | | Source: Table 5.9 from the Scope 3 Standard Notes: In the case of insurance companies, insurance premiums should be regarded as the insurance company’s own capital. Therefore equity investments made by insurance companies using insurance premiums are required to be reported (although companies may establish a threshold for equity investments). Accounting for emissions from insurance contracts is not required. \*Additional guidance on key concepts italicized is provided below. • Scope 1 and scope 2 emissions include the direct (scope 1) emissions of the investee or project, as well as the indirect (scope 2) emissions from the generation of electricity consumed by the investee or project. If relevant, companies should also account for the scope 3 emissions of the investee or project. For example, if a financial institution provides equity or debt financing to a light bulb manufacturer, the financial institution is required to account for the proportional scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of the light bulb manufacturer (i.e., direct emissions during manufacturing and indirect emissions from electricity consumed during manufacturing). The financial institution should account for the scope 3 emissions of the light bulb producer (e.g., scope 3 emissions from consumer use of light bulbs sold by the manufacturer) when scope 3 emissions are significant compared to other source of emissions or otherwise relevant • Total projected lifetime emissions are reported in the initial year the project is financed, not in subsequent years. If a project’s anticipated lifetime is uncertain, companies may report a range of likely values (e.g., for a coal-fired power plant, a company may report a range over a 30- to 60-year time period). Companies should report the assumptions used to estimate total anticipated lifetime emissions. If project financing occurs only once every few years, emissions from project finance may fluctuate significantly from year to year. Companies should provide appropriate context in the public report (e.g., by highlighting exceptional or non-recurring project financing). See section 5.4 of the Scope 3 Standard for more information on the time boundary of scope 3 categories. * * * Table \[15.2\] Accounting for emissions from investments (optional) | Financial investment/service | Description | GHG accounting approach(optional) | | --- | --- | --- | | Debt investments(without known use of proceeds) | General corporate purposes debt holdings(such as bonds or loans) held in the reporting company's portfolio where the use of proceeds is not specified | Companies may account for scope 1and scope 2 emissions of the investee that occur in the reporting year inscope 3,category 15(Investments) | | Managed investments and client services | Investments managed by the reporting company on behalf of clients(using clients'capital®)or services provided by the reporting company to clients,including:Investment and asset management(equity or fixed income funds managed on behalf of clients,using clients' capital)Corporate underwriting and issuance for clients seeking equity or debt capitalFinancial advisory services for clients seeking assistance with mergers and acquisitions or requesting other advisory services | Companies may account for emissions from managed investments and client services in scope 3,category 15(Investments) | | Other investments or financial services | All other types of investments,financial contracts,or financial services not included above(e.g.,pension funds,retirement accounts,securitized products,insurance contracts,credit guarantees,financial guarantees,export credit insurance,credit default swaps,etc.) | Companies may account for emissions from other investments in scope 3,category 15(Investments) | Source: Table 5.10 from the Scope 3 Standard Notes: a. Client’s capital in this context refers to any capital that is not the reporting company’s own capital, e.g., equity and fixed income fund managers investing the capital of the fund’s investors. * * * ## CATEGORY 15 Investments # Calculating emissions from equity investments It is a requirement of the Scope 3 Standard to report emissions from equity investments made by the reporting company using the company’s own capital and balance sheet, including: **••** Equity investments in subsidiaries (or group companies), where the reporting company has financial control (typically more than 50 percent ownership) **••** Equity investments in associate companies (or affiliated companies), where the reporting company has significant influence but not financial control (typically 20-50 percent ownership) **••** Equity investments in joint ventures (non-incorporated joint ventures/partnerships/ operations), where partners have joint financial control **••** Equity investments where the reporting company has neither financial control nor significant influence over the emitting entity (and typically has less than 20 percent ownership). For these equity investments, companies may establish a threshold (e.g., equity share of 1 percent) below which the company excludes equity investments from the inventory, if disclosed and justified. Companies should account for the proportional scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of the investments that occur in the reporting year. Proportional emissions from equity investments should be allocated to the investor based on the investor’s proportional share of equity in the investee. Figure 15.1 shows a decision tree for selecting a calculation method for emissions from equity investments. Companies may use the following methods: **•• Investment-specific method, which involves collecting scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from the investee company** and allocating the emissions based upon the share of investment; or **•• Average-data method, which involves using revenue data combined with EEIO data to estimate the scope 1 and** scope 2 emissions from the investee company and allocating emissions based upon share of investment. Companies should account for the proportional scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of the investments that occur in the reporting year. Companies should account for emissions from the GHG-emitting business activity, regardless of any financial intermediaries involved in the transaction. When scope 3 emissions are significant compared to other sources of emissions, investors should also account for the scope 3 emissions of the investee company. Calculating GHG emissions throughout the value chain of investee companies can help the investor understand and manage the climate change-related risks associated with his or her investments. If the majority of an investee company’s emissions are associated with its value chain, then only focusing on scope 1 and scope 2 emissions will not provide the full picture of the company’s risks. If the investor wants to understand the full GHG impact of the investee companies across their full value chain, for example, to identify hotspots for further engagement, including scope 3 may be more appropriate. The GHG Protocol does not set a threshold above which scope 3 emissions should be included; instead, reporting companies should develop their own significance threshold based on their business goals. EEIO data can be used to quickly estimate the relative size of scope 3 emissions compared to scope 1 and scope 2 emissions for any sector. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[140\] * * * Box \[15.1\] Applicability of calculation methods to managed investments (e.g. mutual funds) Whether an organization is required to report on equity investments depends on whose capital is being invested. Asset owners are investing their own capital, so they are required to report emissions from equity investments (although they may establish a threshold, as described in table 15.1). Asset managers investing clients’ capital may optionally report on emissions from equity investments managed on behalf of clients (e.g., mutual funds). Emissions from these types of equity investments can be calculated using the methods described in this section, however it should be noted that mutual funds and other funds managed on behalf of clients are not the primary audience for the calculation methods described here and some of their specific issues have not been addressed, including the business goals relevant to a fund manager and the appropriate use of inventory results. Figure \[15.1\] Decision tree for selecting a calculation method for emissions from equity investments •• Scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of investee company •• The investor’s proportional share of equity in the investee Investment-specific method The investment-specific method involves collecting scope 1 and scope 2 emissions directly from investee companies and allocating these emissions based upon the proportion of the investment. •• The investor’s proportional share of equity in the investee •• If significant, companies should also collect scope 3 emissions of the investee company (if investee companies are Companies should collect: •• If significant, companies should also collect scope 3 emissions of the investee company (if investee companies are unable to provide scope 3 emissions data, scope 3 emissions may need to be estimated using the average-data method described in option 2). * * * Emission factors needed If using the investment-specific method, the reporting company collects emissions data from investees, thus no emission factors are required. Data collection guidance Sources for data may include: •• GHG inventory reports of investee companies •• Financial records of the reporting company. •• Financial records of the reporting company. Calculation formula \[15.1\] Investment-specific method for calculating emissions from equity investments Emissions from equity investments = ∑ (scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of equity investment × share of equity (%)) Example \[15.1\] Calculating emissions from equity investments using the investment-specific method Company A has two subsidiaries and two joint ventures. Company A used the control approach to determine its boundaries, so it did not include these subsidiaries and joint ventures in its scope 1 and scope 2 emissions inventory. Company A, therefore, includes emissions associated with these four investments in its scope 3 inventory. Company A collects scope 1 and scope 2 emissions associated with the investments from the GHG inventory reports of the investees, and obtains information on the share of the investments from its financial records. | Investment | Investment type | Scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of investee company in reporting year(tonnes CO2e) | Reporting company's share of equity (percent) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | Equity Investment in subsidiary | 120,000 | 40 | | 2 | Equity Investment in subsidiary | 200,000 | 15 | | 3 | Equity investment in joint venture | 1,600,000 | 25 | | 4 | Equity investment in joint venture | 60,000 | 25 | Note: The data are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. * * * Example \[15.1\] Calculating emissions from equity investments using the investment-specific method (continued) emissions from equity investments: ∑ (scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of equity investment × share of equity (%)) \\begin{array}{c}{\\Sigma,(\\mathrm{s c o p e}\\uparrow\\mathrm{a n d},\\mathrm{s c o p e}\\downarrow\\mathrm{2e r i s s i o n s ~~o f~~\\mathrm{e q u i t y}\ \ \\mathrm{i r i s s s i m e r}\ \\times\\mathrm{s h a r e ~~},{fmathrm r e q u i t y},,\\mathrm{s q}u u i i\ ,,900,,.}}}\ {{{(((1110,000\\times400)+(200.000\\times15^{\\circ})++(1.60000\\times255^{\\circ})}}\ {{=48.000+30.000+400,000+1.5000)}}\ {{=483.000,\\mathrm{t o n n e~~},\\mathrm{S C}\_{2}}}\\end{array} Average-data method The average-data method uses Environmentally-extended input-output (EEIO) data to estimate the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions associated with equity investments. The revenue of the investee company should be multiplied by the appropriate EEIO emission factor that is representative of the investee company’s sector of the economy. For example, an apparel manufacturer should use an EEIO emission factor for apparel manufacturing. The reporting company should then use its proportional share of equity to allocate the estimated scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of the investee company. Using EEIO data has limitations. EEIO databases contain average emission factors for each sector; therefore, when EEIO data is used to estimate emissions from investments, it is not possible to differentiate between investments within a particular sector. Using EEIO data can enable an investor to identify which sectors contribute most to its scope 3 investments category emissions, but investee-specific data would be required to identify the emissions hotspots within a particular sector. Another limitation is that the use of EEIO data will not enable the investor to track the GHG emissions of investee companies over time. See “Environmentally-extended input output (EEIO) data,” in the Introduction for a broader discussion of the limitations of EEIO data. Activity data needed The reporting company should collect; The reporting company should collect; The minimum boundary for reporting is the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of the investee company. However, EEIO databases provide emission factors that include all upstream emissions. Therefore, if the investor is reporting only scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of the investee company, the EEIO emissions factor will need to be disaggregated to separate scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from all other upstream scope 3 emissions. Disaggregating the EEIO emission factor enables reporting companies to separate the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from all other upstream scope 3 emissions, although sufficient information to do this may not be available. If disaggregation of the EEIO emission is not possible, reporting companies should use the full EEIO emission factor (i.e. include all upstream emissions). Reporting companies should clearly disclose the boundary used (either scope 1 and scope 2, or all upstream emissions). •• Revenue of investee company (if the investee company operates in more than one sector, the reporting company should collect data on the revenue for each sector in which it operates) •• The investor’s proportional share of equity in the investee. •• EEIO emission factors for the sectors of the economy that the investments are related to (kg CO2e/$ revenue). •• The investor’s proportional share of equity in the investee. * * * When scope 3 emissions are significant compared with other sources of emissions, investors should also account for the scope 3 emissions of the investee company. Including upstream scope 3 emissions is simple when using EEIO databases because the EEIO emission factors include all upstream emissions. Reporting companies should account for any significant changes in exchange rates and inflation rates over time. If possible, the EEIO data should be representative of the geographic region in which the investee company is located. Data collection guidance Data may be collected from the following sources: •• Revenue data and equity share data will be available from financial records of the reporting company and the investee company •• Emission factors are available from EEIO databases (a list of databases is provided on the GHG Protocol website ( [http://www.ghgprotocol.org/Third-Party-Databases](http://www.ghgprotocol.org/Third-Party-Databases)). Additional databases may be added periodically, so continue to check the website. Calculation formula \[15.2\] Average-data method for calculating emissions from equity investments sum across equity investments: ∑ ((investee company total revenue ($) × emission factor for investee’s sector (kg CO2e/$ revenue)) × share of equity (%)) * * * Example \[15.2\] Calculating emissions from equity investments using the average-data method Company A is an investment bank. It has a broad portfolio of proprietary equity investments in dozens of companies across geographic regions. Company A is unable to collect the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of its investments because most investees have not completed GHG inventories. Company A decides to use the economic data method by grouping its investments by the sectors of the economy in which the investees are engaged. It collects EEIO emission factors for corresponding sectors by reference to EEIO databases. Company A obtains information on the share of the investments from its financial records and the financial reports of the investee companies. The information is summarized as follows: | Investee company | Revenue of investee company($) | Reporting company's share of equity(percent) | Investee company's sector(s) of operation | Investee company's revenue in sector(percent) | Scope 1 and scope 2 emission factor of sector(kgCO2e/$ revenue) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | 3,000,000 | 5 | Telecommunication | 100 | 0.6 | | 2 | 7,500,000 | 15 | Pharmaceutical | 100 | 0.5 | | 3 | 1,150,000 | 20 | Energy generation | 100 | 3.0 | | 4 | 5,500,000 | 10 | Food and beverage | 60 | 2.0 | | Apparel | 40 | 1.5 | | | | Note: The activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only and do not refer to actual data. \\begin{array}{r l}{\\Sigma{\ (\\mathrm{i n i n e ~~S e r p o n i s a~~ f r e i n e t i o e ~~()}\\times\\mathrm{e m i s t i o n~~ f a a t o o f ~~f o i~~ n e s s s ~~c o t o o~~(\\mathrm{i O},S)/})\\times\\mathrm{s h i a d ~~o f~~ e f i l y g y})}}&{}\ {=(0.0.000.00.times000times0.00\\times0.0.\\times0.5,}\ &{\ (+5.500.00.times000timestimes0.5)}\ &{+(5.500.000times.00.timestimes0.5)}\ &{+(5.500000.times000timestimes0.00.00\\times0.4,\\times1.5)\\times0.}\ &{=90.00000+50.600+0000000+00000,0.242500\ \\mathrm{t}n n o n~S\ mathrm C,}\\end{array} * * * ## CATEGORY 15 Investments # Calculating emissions from project finance and from debt investments with known use of proceeds This section describes calculation methods used to calculate emissions from: **••** Project finance **••** Debt investments with known use of proceeds. Project finance is defined in the Scope 3 Standard as long-term financing of projects (e.g., infrastructure and industrial projects) by the reporting company as either an equity investor (sponsor) or debt investor (financier). Corporate debt holdings with known use of proceeds are defined in the Scope 3 Standard as debt investments where the use of proceeds is identified as going to a particular project, such as to build a specific power plant. For each year during the term of the investment, companies should account for proportional scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of relevant projects that occur in the reporting year. Proportional emissions from project finance and debt investments with known use of proceeds should be allocated to the investor based on the investor’s proportional share of total project costs (total equity plus debt). If scope 3 emissions of projects are significant compared to scope 1 and scope 2 emissions, investors should also account for proportional scope 3 emissions of projects that occur in the reporting year. This accounting could be particularly relevant for infrastructure projects like highways or bridges, where the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions during the operational phase of the projects are minimal compared with the scope 3 emissions from the use of the infrastructure (i.e., the emissions from the vehicles driving on the highway or bridge). Figure 15.2 shows a decision tree for selecting a calculation method for emissions from project finance and debt investments with known use of proceeds. Companies may use the following methods: **•• Project-specific method, which involves collecting scope 1 and scope 2 emissions for the relevant project(s) and** allocating these emissions based on the investor’s proportional share of total project costs (total equity plus debt) **•• Average-data method, which involves using EEIO data to estimate the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from the** investee company and allocating emissions based on share of total project costs (total equity plus debt). If the reporting company is an initial sponsor or lender of a project, it should also account for the total projected lifetime scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of relevant projects financed during the reporting year, and report those emissions separately from scope 3. The methods for calculating total projected lifetime emissions of projects are described in a subsequent section of this chapter-Calculating total projected lifetime emissions from project finance and _debt investments with known use of proceeds._ ## Box \[15.2\] Calculating emissions from general corporate purposes debt investments The Scope 3 Standard distinguishes debt investments with known use of proceeds from general corporate purposes debt holdings (see tables 15.1 and 15.2). General corporate purposes debt holdings (such as bonds or loans) where the use **of proceeds is not specified can optionally be reported in a reporting company’s scope 3 inventory.** Calculating emissions from debt investments where the use of proceeds is not specified should use the methods described for equity investments in section 15.1 (Calculating emissions from equity investments) except that the proportional share should be calculated based on the investor’s proportional share of total equity plus debt. It should be noted that the calculation methodologies described in this guidance apply to long-term debt. Short-term debt (such as revolving credit facilities) would pose additional accounting challenges that are not addressed in this guidance. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[146\] * * * Figure \[15.2\] Decision tree for selecting a calculation method for emissions from project finance and debt investments with known use of proceeds Project-specific method The project-specific method involves collecting scope 1 and scope 2 emissions directly from the investee company for The project-specific method involves collecting scope 1 and scope 2 emissions directly from the investee company for the relevant project(s) and allocating these emissions based on the investor’s proportional share of total project costs (total equity plus debt). Companies should collect: •• Scope 1 and scope 2 emissions that occur in the reporting year for the relevant projects •• The investor’s proportional share of total project costs (total equity plus debt). •• The investor’s proportional share of total project costs (total equity plus debt). •• Financial records of the reporting company •• A number countries and regions now have mandatory GHG reporting requirements for facilities over a certain size. •• A number countries and regions now have mandatory GHG reporting requirements for facilities over a certain size. These databases are usually available to the public. * * * Calculation formula \[15.3\] Project-specific method for calculating emissions from project finance and debt investments with known use of proceeds CO2e emissions from projects = sum across projects: ∑ (scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of relevant project in the reporting year × share of total project costs (%)) Example \[15.3\] Calculating emissions from project finance and debt investments with known use of proceeds using the project-specific method Company A is an investment bank. It makes debt investments in a number of utility and infrastructure companies for specific projects (such as building a new power plant). Company A collects scope 1 and scope 2 emissions data from the companies on the projects for which the investment bank provided debt capital. The information is summarized as follows: | Investee company | Scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of project in reporting year(tonnes CO2e) | Value of debt investment($) | Total project costs(total equity plus debt)($) | Share of total project costs(percent) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | 200,000 | 1,000,000 | 20,000,000 | 5.00 | | 2 | 10,000 | 5,000,000 | 50,000,000 | 10.00 | | 3 | 250,000 | 3,000,000 | 60,000,000 | 5.00 | | 4 | 30,000 | 10,000,000 | 90,000,000 | 11.11 | Note: The activity data and emissions factors are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data. The average-data method uses environmentally-extended input output (EEIO) data to estimate the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from projects. The project cost should be multiplied by appropriate emission factors that are representative of the sectors of the economy to which the project relates. For example, for a manufacturing facility construction project, an EEIO emission factor for “Construction of nonresidential manufacturing structures” should be used. The reporting company should then use its proportional share of total project costs (total equity plus debt) to allocate the project’s emissions. Average-data method \\begin{array}{r}{\\mathsf{e r m i s S i o n s ~~f r o m~~ d e b t ~~i n v e s t m e n t s~~ w t t h ~~k n o w n~~ u f e~o r o c e e d s}}\ {=(200,000\\times0.05)+(10,000\\times0.1)+(250,000\\times0.5)+(30,000\\times0.05)+(30,000\\times0.11\ 1}\\end{array} ={\ 10,000+1,000+1.20,500+3,333=26.833\ o{\\cap}{cap}{\\cap}{\\cap{}}{\ }{\ }{\ }{\ }{\ }{\ }\\cap}{\ {{}}{\ }\\cap}{\ {{}}{\ }\\cap}{{}\ * * * Using EEIO data has limitations (see “Environmentally-extended input output (EEIO) data,” in the Introduction for more information), so this option should only be used as a last resort if project-specific data is not available. Companies should clearly report on the methodology and assumptions used to calculate their emissions within this category. Activity data needed The reporting company should collect: •• Project costs in the reporting year (if the project is in the construction phase); or •• Revenue of the project (if the project is in the operational phase); and •• Revenue of the project (if the project is in the operational phase); and •• •• The investor’s proportional share of total project costs (total equity plus debt). Emission factors needed The reporting company should collect one of the following: •• EEIO emission factors for the relevant construction sector that the investments are related to (kg CO2e/$) (if the project is in the construction phase) •• EEIO emission factors for the relevant operating sector that the investments are related to (kg CO2e/$) (if the project •• EEIO emission factors for the relevant operating sector that the investments are related to (kg CO2e/$) (if the project is in the operational phase). Reporting companies should ensure that EEIO data is up-to-date and account for any significant changes in exchange rates and inflation rates over time. If possible, the EEIO data should be representative of the e geographic region where the project is located. If a project (e.g., certain infrastructure projects) does not generate revenue during its operational phase then EEIO data cannot be used to estimate emissions. In these cases, other data or assumptions, such as industry or government studies of similar projects, can be used to estimate emissions from the operational phase. Data collection guidance Data collection guidance Data may be collected from the following sources: •• Project cost and investment share data will be available from financial records of the reporting company and the investee company •• •• Emission factors from EEIO databases (a list of databases is provided on the GHG Protocol website [http://www](http://www/). ghgprotocol.org/Third-Party-Databases). Additional databases may be added periodically, so continue to check the website. * * * Calculation formula \[15.4\]verage-data method for calculating emissions from project finance and debt A investments with known use of proceeds Emissions from project finance and debt investments with known use proceeds = | sum across projects in the construction phase: | | | --- | --- | | Σ((project construction cost in the reporting year($)) | | | x emission factor of relevant construction sector(kgCO2e/$ revenue)) | | | x share of total project costs(%)) | | | sum across projects in the operational phase: | | | Σ((project revenue in the reporting year($)) | | | x emission factor of relevant operating sector(kgCO2e/$ revenue)) | | | x share of total project costs(%)) | | sum across projects in the construction phase: ∑ ((project construction cost in the reporting year ($) x emission factor of relevant construction sector (kg CO2e/$ revenue)) x share of total project costs (%)) Example \[15.4\] Calculating emissions from project finance and debt investments with known use of proceeds using the average data method Company A is an investment bank. It makes debt investments in a number of companies for specific projects (such as building a new power plant). This is the first year Company A has carried out a scope 3 inventory and due to time and resource constraints, it decided not to engage with the investee companies, but instead wants to use secondary data to estimate emissions. Company A states that it will consider engagement with investee companies in future years. | Type of project | Project phase | Project construction cost or project revenue in reporting year ($ million) | Relevant EEIO sector | EEIO emission factor (scope 1 and scope 2 emissions only)(tonnes CO2e/$ millions) | Share of total project costs(value of debt investment/total equity plus debt)(percent) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Bridge | Construction | 20 | Other non-residential structures | 310 | 7 | | Hospital | Construction | 8 | Construction of non-residential commercial and health care structures | 325 | 10 | | Paper manufacturing facility | Operation | 3 | Paper mills | 500 | 5 | | Coal-fired power plant | Operation | 15 | Power generation and supply | 9,000 | 5 | * * * ## CATEGORY 15 Investments ## Example \[15.4\] Calculating emissions from project finance and debt investments with known use of ## proceeds using the average data method (continued) ## emissions from debt investments with known use of proceeds = ∑ ((project construction costs in the reporting year or project revenue in reporting year ($) × emission factor of sector (kg CO2e/$)) x share of total project costs) = ((20 x 310) x 0.07) + ((8 x 325) x 0.10) + ((3 x 500) x 0.05) + ((15 x 9,000) x 0.05) = 434 + 260 + 75 + 6,750 = 7,519 tonnes CO2e _**Calculating total projected lifetime emissions from project finance and debt investments with known use of proceeds**_ If the reporting company is an initial sponsor or lender of a project, it should also account for the total projected lifetime scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of relevant projects financed during the reporting year, and report those emissions separately from scope 3. Accounting for the projected lifetime emissions reflects the longer term nature of these forms of investment. Accounting for total projected lifetime emissions is in addition to (and separate from) accounting for annual scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of projects for each year during the term of the investment (as described in the previous section Calculating emissions from project finance and from debt investments with known use of proceeds). Total projected lifetime emissions are reported in the initial year the project is financed, not in subsequent years, and emissions should not be amortized or discounted. As it is required for companies to account for proportional scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of projects for each year during the term of the investment, reporting amortized projected lifetime emissions each year during the term of the investment in addition to annual scope 1 and scope 2 emissions would result in double counting. Once the project has been constructed and is operational, the lifetime emissions have been locked in, so it is in the initial stage of a project where total lifetime emissions should be taken into consideration. Companies should report the assumptions used to estimate total anticipated lifetime scope 1 and scope 2 emissions. When scope 3 emissions of projects are significant compared to scope 1 and scope 2 emissions, investors should also account for total projected lifetime scope 3 emissions of projects. This could be particularly relevant for infrastructure projects like highways or bridges, where the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of the projects during the operational phase are minimal compared to the scope 3 emissions from the use of the infrastructure (i.e., the emissions from the vehicles driving on the highway or bridge). Any claims of avoided emissions related to a project must be reported separately from the company’s scope 1, scope 2, and scope 3 inventories. (For more information, see section 9.5 of the Scope 3 Standard). Calculating projected lifetime emissions typically requires making assumptions about the operation of the asset and its expected lifetime. The data needed to calculate expected emissions will depend on the type of project. ## Companies should collect: **••** Expected average annual emissions of project. For power plants for example, emissions can be derived from the plant’s capacity and heat rate, the carbon content of the fuel, and projected capacity utilization **••** Expected lifetime of project. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[151\] * * * ## CATEGORY 15 Investments If there is uncertainty around a project’s anticipated lifetime, companies may report a range of likely values (e.g., for a coal-fired power plant, a company may report a range of 30- to 60-years). ## Calculation formula \[15.4\]or calculating projected total lifetime emissions from project finance Method f ## and debt investments with known use of proceeds ## Projected total lifetime emissions from project finance and debt investments ## with known use proceeds = ∑ ((projected annual emissions of project x projected lifetime of project) x share of total project costs) Note that project total lifetime emissions are only required to be reported in the initial year the project is financed, so the share of total project costs (total equity plus debt) refers only to initial sponsors/lenders. ## Example \[15.5\] Calculating projected total lifetime emissions from project finance and debt investments ## with known use of proceeds Company A is an investment bank. In the reporting year, the bank project financed the construction of one power plant as an initial lender. The information is summarized as follows: _**Expected annual emissions Expected lifetime of Proportional share of total project costs**_ _**(tonnes) project (years) (total equity plus debt) (percent)**_ 7,000,000 30–60 15 Note: The data are illustrative only, and do not refer to actual data Projected lifetime emissions of projects financed in the reporting year = (projected annual emissions of project x projected lifetime of project) x share of total project costs **30 year lifetime: (7,000,000 x 30) x 0.15 = 31,500,000 tonnes CO2** e **60 year lifetime: (7,000,000 x 60) x 0.15 = 63,000,000 tonnes CO2** e _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[152\] * * * ## Appendix A: Sampling ### company needing to collect a large quantity of data for a particular scope 3 category ### may find it impractical or impossible to collect the data from each activity in the # A category. In such cases, companies may use appropriate sampling techniques to ### extrapolate data from a representative sample of activities within the category. Companies may also choose to categorize activities into similar groups for data collection. This strategy should group activities with similar anticipated emissions intensities. For example: **••** Companies with a large number of leased assets (Categories 8 and 13) or franchises (Category 14) may group buildings by building type or floor area and vehicles by vehicle type **••** Companies with a large number of employees collecting data on employee commuting (Category 7) may wish to extrapolate data from a representative sample of employees **••** Companies with a large number of distribution channels may use sampling when calculating the emissions associated with Categories 4 and 9 (Transportation and Distribution). Companies should choose a sampling method that aligns with their business goals and document and justify their choice. The choice of sampling method will depend on factors including, but not limited to: **••** Available resources **••** Number of data points **••** Expected level of homogeneity between samples **••** Geographical spread of data points **••** Ease of data collection **••** Timeframe available. Ultimately, the use of sampling and choice of a specific sampling method aims to optimize the trade-off between cost and accurately representing all emission sources in the scope 3 category. Companies may use a variety of sampling methods, as appropriate for each specific emissions activity. _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[153\] * * * Sampling methods Sampling methods available to companies include, but are not limited to: •• Simple random sampling •• Systematic sampling •• Systematic sampling •• •• Stratified sampling Each approach is summarized below. Alternative methods for sampling may also be used. Simple Random Sampling Simple random sampling involves randomly selecting activities (i.e., a sample) from a larger set of activities (i.e., the entire population). If the total number of activities from which a sample is selected is small, simple random sampling may be performed at its most basic level by selecting activities at random. If the total number of activities is large, for example with hundreds or thousands of activities, then random sampling is better performed by computer. Advantages of simple random sampling include: •• With an appropriate sample size, simple random sampling creates a representative view of the entire population. (For example, if a company has fifty employees located within a close geographical area and wants to determine the average commuting distance, it may choose to collect data from ten randomly selected employees as a representative sample.) •• It is relatively straightforward to construct the sample. •• It is relatively straightforward to construct the sample. Disadvantages of simple random sampling include: •• The sample size needed to generate appropriately representative results may be prohibitively large and cumbersome to sample. (For example, if a retail organization has thousands of stores in many countries, randomly selecting individual stores may result in a difficult and time-consuming data collection process.) •• It may not be possible to obtain a complete list of all activities from the sample size, which is a prerequisite for •• It may not be possible to obtain a complete list of all activities from the sample size, which is a prerequisite for simple random sampling. (For example, if a distribution company wants to determine the average backhaul capacity of its trucks, it would have to list every journey before a random sample could be selected.) Systematic Sampling Systematic sampling involves randomly selecting the first item to sample and then selecting subsequent activities at regular intervals. An appropriate sampling interval should be chosen so that the company achieves the desired sample size. For example, if a company sourced agricultural products from 100 farms but only wanted to sample 20 farms, an appropriate sampling interval would be every 5 farms. If the first farm to be sampled was picked as Farm 3, the company would subsequently sample from Farms 8, 13, 18, 23,…, 93, 98. * * * Calculation formula \[A.1\] Selecting an appropriate systematic sampling interval sampling interval = total population size / desired sample size Advantages of systematic sampling include: •• Simple to implement •• •• The population is guaranteed to be evenly sampled without risk that the sample points are clustered together. Disadvantages of systematic sampling include: •• If there is a periodic pattern in the population to be sampled, it could lead to biased sampling •• As with simple random sampling, it may not be possible to obtain a complete list of all activities in the population. •• As with simple random sampling, it may not be possible to obtain a complete list of all activities in the population. Stratified Sampling Stratified sampling initially groups the population’s activities into categories with similar characteristics. Random Stratified sampling initially groups the population’s activities into categories with similar characteristics. Random sampling is subsequently performed within these homogeneous groups. The company should initially create population groups containing activities with characteristics likely to offer similar intensities of GHG emissions. Grouping variables could include location, size, building type, manufacturing technique, age, etc. For example, if an agricultural produce company was assessing emissions from its farms, it may use the following variable to create initial groupings of all farms: high / low rainfall; smaller than 100 hectares / larger than 100 hectares; north-facing-hill / south-facing-hill / neither. Stratified sampling is particularly useful when the variability in GHG emissions within groups is small, but the variability between groups is large. Advantages of stratified sampling: •• Allows companies to draw insights into the source and level of emissions among different groups. This level of detail may be lost with simple random sampling. •• Different random sampling techniques may be employed for different groups as appropriate. •• The necessary sample size can be reduced due to lower variability within groups, therefore saving time and money. •• Allows companies to draw insights into the source and level of emissions among different groups. This level of detail •• Different random sampling techniques may be employed for different groups as appropriate. Disadvantages of stratified sampling: * * * Sample Size Determining sample size is fundamental to any sampling activity. The choice of sample size will be influenced by several factors, including the likely significance of GHG emissions from the sources in question, the size of the population, the variability of the emission sources, and the necessary degree of precision. Determining sample size There are several approaches to determining sample size. In particular, four alternative approaches may prove useful for companies: •• Using the sample size of a similar inventory •• Using online calculators •• Using online calculators •• •• Using published tables •• •• Using formulas. Using the sample size of a similar inventory Companies may refer to similar inventories for guidance on appropriate sample size and sampling technique. When using Companies may refer to similar inventories for guidance on appropriate sample size and sampling technique. When using this approach, companies should justify the similarity and appropriateness for the comparison. Companies may refer to similar inventories that have been externally verified for guidance on appropriate sample size and sampling technique. Using online calculators Online calculators are a quick and easy way to assess sample size. Online calculators are a quick and easy way to assess sample size. For example: •• [http://www.research-advisors.com/tools/SampleSize.htm](http://www.research-advisors.com/tools/SampleSize.htm) provides a downloadable spreadsheet to calculate necessary sample size with the ability to tailor the sampling criteria. •• [http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm](http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm) provides an interactive online calculator for sample size; however, the •• [http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm](http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm) provides an interactive online calculator for sample size; however, the choices for confidence level are fixed. Using published tables Many published tables give the necessary sample size for a specific set of criteria. Such criteria include precision, confidence levels, and variability for a given population size. Companies that want greater assurance for their choice of sample size may turn to established formulas. Formulas for the calculation of sample size are available in all standard statistics and sampling text books, as well as via the internet. Users should refer to standard statistics texts or search online for a table matching their specific sampling criteria. When applying sample size formulas, users may find it advantageous to seek the advice of a person with experience of statistics. * * * Level of accuracy The level of accuracy is related to the sample size, sampling strategy, and the measurement system. Assuming a normal distribution, increasing the sample size is likely to reduce the sampling error using the relationship v = √n. In this relationship “v” represents the variability of the data values. It is important to recognize that all measurements contain some level of uncertainty. An estimate of the measurement uncertainty should be obtained, particularly for parts of the assessment that contribute significantly to the organization and/ or if subsequent investment decisions are made based on the measurement. Confidence level An estimate of the uncertainty, which should include both precision and bias from random error and systematic error respectively, will enable an interpretation of the measurement. For example, a level of uncertainty of ±5 percent would imply for an emissions estimate of 100 tonnes CO2e, that the actual emissions lie somewhere between 95 and 105 tonnes CO2e. The confidence level associated with the uncertainty normally corresponds to a 95 percent confidence level, that is, 2 standard deviations. For example, the true value lies in the range of 95 and 105 tonnes with 95 percent confidence. \\mathrm{C O}\_{2}\\mathrm{e} Variability Variability refers to the degree of difference between activities within the population. A population that is more heterogeneous (more variable) will require a larger sample size. A variability of 50 percent is the maximum level of variability in a population. Therefore, a variability assumption of 0.5 is often used as a conservative estimate. * * * ## Appendix B: Scenario uncertainty ## in calculating emissions from the use of sold products ### cenario uncertainty assessment (also known as sensitivity analysis) is a useful tool ### to understand how changes in the product’s design, use, and disposal could impact # Sinventory results. It can be thought of as the impact of potential situations other ### than the conditions and assumptions made in the product’s inventory results and report. #### Example \[B.1\] Scenario analysis: measuring uncertainty in calculating emissions from the use of sold products Company A produces electric fans for residential consumers. The electric fan has a wattage of 300. Company data indicates that consumers use the electric fan an average of 40 days a year, with an average use of 6 hours/day for a total of 5 years of use before disposing of the fan. **To calculate use-phase emissions, the company made the following calculations:** total lifetime usage = 40 x 6 x 5 = 1,200 hours CO2e emissions per hour of use = wattage x electricity grid factor = 300 x 0.45 = 0.135 kg CO2e/hour use the company sold 1,000 units in the reporting year, so total use-phase emissions for the reporting company = 1,200 x 0.135 x 1,000 = 162,000 kg CO2e = 162 tonnes CO2e _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[158\] * * * Example \[B.1\] Scenario analysis: measuring uncertainty in calculating emissions from the use of sold products (continued) For both the reporting company and stakeholders, it may be valuable to understand how a change in the use pattern would change the inventory results. Company A has defined the average usage scenario in situation 1. However, based on research the company conducted, the number of days that the electric fan is used could range between 20 and 60 per year, and the lifespan of the fan could range from 5 to 8 years. To understand the impacts of the use phase of the electric fan in these different scenarios, four hypothetical scenarios were developed based on the range of use days per year and the range of life span. Total use-phase emissions were then calculated for each scenario. | Situation | Use days/year | Use hours/day | Use lifespan(years) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | 40 | 6 | 5 | | 2 | 60 | 6 | 5 | | 3 | 60 | 6 | 8 | | 4 | 20 | 6 | 5 | | 5 | 20 | 6 | 8 | Electric fan use-phase emissions under different use situations As shown in the table and graph above, different scenarios show different use phase emissions. The scenario uncertainty analysis helps the reporting company ensure that the scenario used in the inventory is representative of the range of scenarios, and not the scenario with the lowest emissions. If the scenario uncertainty shows a very large range in emissions, and if this range is significant relative to total scope 3 emissions, companies may choose to conduct more detailed analysis of the use profile of the product to more accurately calculate use-phase emissions and reduce the uncertainty. * * * Appendix C: Calculating emissions intensity metrics he Scope 3 Standard states that companies may report emissions intensity metrics to avoid misinterpretation of emission results as more durable products with longer lifetimes would at first appear to have higher lifetime use-phase emissions. To convert absolute emissions to an emissions intensity metric, companies should calculate emissions per a relevant unit of measure. Examples of emissions intensity metrics are given in table C.1. Table \[C.1\] Examples of emissions intensity metrics using different units of measure | Product | Emissions intensity metric | | --- | --- | | Can of cola | kg CO2e per 330ml can | | Washing machine | kg CO2e per wash | | Television | kg CO2e per hour of viewing | | Car | kg CO2e per kilometer driven | \\mathrm{K G},\\mathrm{C O}\_{2}e * * * ## APPENDIX C Calculating emissions intensity metrics ## Calculation formula \[C.1\] Calculating emission intensity metrics ## CO2e emissions per functional unit of product = ## number of units over lifetime of sold product: total lifetime emissions units per lifetime of products The reporting company must first decide on the unit of measure to apply to the product. The emissions intensity metric is then calculated as shown in formula C.1 above. ## Example \[C.1\] Calculating emission intensity metrics Company A manufactures and sells washing machines. The company calculated their emissions from use of sold products (category 11) as 500,000 kg CO2e. Company A then decided to report an emissions intensity metric to give context to the use-phase emissions of its washing machines. An example of an intensity metric that could be used for washing machines is noted in example 11.2 (Calculating indirect use-phase emissions from products that indirectly consume energy (fuels or electricity) during use) – kg CO2e per wash. Using this intensity metric, emissions are calculated as follows: Number of units over lifetime of all products sold in the reporting year = lifetime units per product × total number of products sold in reporting year = 1,500 washes × 2,000 washing machines = 3,000,000 washes over lifetime of all sold products **As stated above, the total emissions from use of Company A’s sold products is 500,000 kg CO2e.** **So the emissions intensity can be calculated as follows:** total lifetime emissions emissions intensity metric = number of functional units performed over lifetime of sold products 500,000 = 3,000,000 ## = 0.1667 kg CO2e per wash _Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions_ \[161\] * * * Appendix D: Calculation formula summary tables Summary of calculation methods for category 1 (Purchased goods and services) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factor Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Supplier-specific method | sum across purchased goods and services: | | | | ∑(quantities of good purchased(e.g.,kg) | | | | | × supplier-specific product emission factor of purchased good or service | | | | | (e.g.,kg CO2/kg)) | Quantities or units of goods or services purchased | Supplier-specific emission factors for the purchased goods or services(e.g.,if the supplier has conducted a reliable cradle-to-gate GHG inventory,product footprint or internal LCA report) | | | Hybrid method(where supplier-specific activity data is availablefor all activities associated with producing the purchased goods) | sum across purchased goods and services: | | | | ∑scope 1 and 2 emissions of tier 1 supplier relating to purchased good or service | | | | | (kgCO2/kg) | | | | | + | | | | | sum across material inputs of the purchased goods and services: | | | | | ∑(mass or quantity of material inputs used by tier 1 supplier relating to purchased good or service (kg or unit) | | | | | × cradle-to-gate emission factor for the material (kg CO2/kg or kg CO2/unit)) | | | | | + | | | | | sum across transport of material inputs to tier 1 supplier: | | | | | ∑(distance of transport of material inputs to tier 1 supplier (km) | | | | | × mass or volume of material input (tonnes or TEUs) | | | | | × cradle-to-gate emission factor for the vehicle type (kg CO2/tonne or TEU/km)) | | | | | + | | | | | sum across waste outputs by tier 1 supplier relating to purchased goods and services: | | | | | ∑(mass of waste from tier 1 supplier relating to purchased good or service (kg) | | | | | × emission factor for waste activity (kg CO2/kg)) | | | | | + | | | | | other emissions emitted in provision of the good or service as applicable | Allocated scope 1 and 2 data(including emissions from electricity use and fuel use and any process and fugitive emissions)by supplier relating to the good or service purchased by the reporting company.For guidance on allocating emissions,refer to chapter8 of the Scope3 Standard. | | | | Mass or quantity of material inputs(e.g.,bil of materials)used by supplier to produce purchased goods | | | | | Mass or quantity of fuel inputs used by supplier to produce purchased goods | | | | | Distance from the origin of the raw material inputs to the supplier(the transport emissions from the supplier to the reporting company is calculatedin category4 so should not be included here) | | | | | Quantities of waste output by supplier to produce purchased goods | | | | | Other emissions emitted in provision of the purchased goods as applicable | Depending what activity data has been collectedfrom the supplier,companies may need to collect: | | | | Cradle-to-gate emission factors for materialsused by tier 1 supplier to produce purchased goods(Note: these emission factors can eitherbe supplier-specific emission factors provided by the supplier,or industry average emissionfactors sourced from a secondary database.In general,preference should be given to more specific and verified emission factors) | | | | | Life cycle emission factors for fuel used by incoming transport of input materials to tier 1supplier | | | | | Emission factors for waste outputs by tier 1supplier to produce purchased goods | | | | | Other emission factors as applicable(e.g.,process emissions) | | | | | The secondary emission factors requiredwill also depend on what data is available for the purchased good.Companies will need to collect either: | | | | | Cradle-to-gate emission factors of the purchasedgoods or services per unit of mass or unitof product(e.g.,kg CO2/kg or kg CO2/hour spent);or | | | | | Cradle-to-gate emission factors of the purchasedgoods or services per unit of economic value(e.g.,kg CO2/$) | | | | * * * Summary of calculation methods for category 1 (Purchased goods and services) (continued) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factor Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Hybrid method(where only allocated scope 1 and 2 emissions and waste data are available from supplier) | sum across purchased goods and services:∑scope1andscope2emissionsoftier1supplierrelatingtopurchasedgoodorservice(kgCO2e)+∑(massofwastefromtier1supplierrelatingtothepurchasedgood(kg)× emissionfactorforwasteactivity(kgCO2e/kg))+∑(massorquantityofunitsofpurchasedgoodorservice(kg)× emissionfactorofpurchasedgoodexcludingscope1,scope2,andemissionsfromwastegeneratedbyproducer(kgCO2e/kgorunitor$)) | | | | Average-data method | sum across purchasedgoodsandservices:∑(massofpurchasedgoodorservice(kg)× emissionfactorofpurchasedgoodorserviceperunitofmass(kgCO2e/kg))or∑(unitofpurchasedgoodorservice(e.g.,piece)× emissionfactorofpurchasedgoodorserviceperreferenceunit(e.g.,kgCO2e/piece)) | ·Massornumberofunitsofpurchasedgoodsorservicesfora givenyear(e.g.,kg,hoursspent,etc.) | ·Cradle-to-gateemissionfactorsofthepurchasedgoodsorservicesperunitofmassorunitofproduct(e.g.,kgCO2e/kgorkgCO2e/hourspent) | | Spend-based method | sum across purchasedgoodsandservices:∑(valueofpurchasedgoodorservice($)× emissionfactorofpurchasedgoodorserviceperunitofeconomicvalue(kgCO2e/$)) | ·Amountspentonpurchasedgoodsorservices,byproducttype,usingmarketvalues(e.g.,dollars) | ·Cradle-to-gateemissionfactorsofthepurchasedgoodsorservicesperunitofeconomicvalue(e.g.,kgCO2e/$) | * * * Summary of calculation methods for category 2 (Capital goods) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factor Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Supplier-specific method | sum across capital goods: | | | | Σ(quantities of capital good purchased(e.g.,kg) | | | | | × supplier-specific product emission factor of capital good(e.g.,kg CO2/kg)) | Quantity or units of capital goods purchased in the reporting year | Supplier-specific emission factors for the capital goods(e.g.,if the supplier has conducted a reliable cradle-to-gate CHG inventory,product footprint or internal LCA report) | | Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 3 (Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in scope 1 or scope 2) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factor Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | A. Upstream emissions of purchased fuels | | | | | Supplier-specific or average-data method | sum across each fuel type consumed: | | | | Σ(fuel consumed(e.g.,kWh)×upstream fuel emission factor(kgCO2e/kWh)) | | | | | where: | | | | | upstream fuel emission factor=life cycle emission factor-combustion emission factor | Quantities and types of fuel consumed | Supplier-specific method | | | ·Fuel-provider-specific emission factors on extraction,production and transportation of fuels per unit of fuel consumed by the reporting company(e.g.,kgCO2e/kWh),by fuel type and country or region | | | | | Average-data method | | | | | ·Average emission factors for upstream emissions per unit of consumption(e.g.,kgCO2e/kWh) | | | | | B. Upstream emissions of purchased electricity | | | | | Supplier-specific or average-data method | sum across suppliers,regions,or countries: | | | | Σ(electricity consumed(kWh)×upstream electricity emission factor(kgCO2e/kWh)) | | | | | +steam consumed(kWh)×upstream steam emission factor(kgCO2e/kWh) | | | | | +heating consumed(kWh)×upstream heating emission factor(kgCO2e/kWh) | | | | | +cooling consumed(kWh)×upstream cooling emission factor(kgCO2e/kWh)) | | | | | where: | | | | | upstream emission factor=life cycle emission factor-combustion emissions factor-T&D losses | | | | | Note:T&D losses need to be subtracted only if they are included in the life cycle emission factor.Companies should check the emission factor to establish whether or not T&D losses have been taken into account. | Total quantities of electricity,steam,heating or cooling purchased and consumed per unit of consumption(e.g.,MWh),broken down by supplier,grid region or country | Supplier-specific method | | | ·Utility-specific emission factors for extraction,production and transportation of fuels consumed per MWh of electricity,steam,heating or cooling generated | | | | | Average-data method | | | | | ·Grid-region,country,or regional emission factors for extraction,production and transportation of fuels per unit of consumption(e.g.,kgCO2e/kWh)of electricity,steam,heating or cooling generated | | | | | C.T&D losses | | | | | Supplier-specific or average-data method | sum across suppliers,regions,or countries: | | | | Σ(electricity consumed(kWh)×electricity life cycle emission factor((kgCO2e/kWh) | | | | | ×T&D loss rate(%)) | | | | | +steam consumed(kWh)×steam life cycle emission factor((kgCO2e/kWh) | | | | | ×T&D loss rate(%)) | | | | | +heating consumed(kWh)×heating life cycle emission factor((kgCO2e/kWh) | | | | | ×T&D loss rate(%)) | | | | | +cooling consumed(kWh)×cooling life cycle emission factor((kgCO2e/kWh) | | | | | ×T&D loss rate%) | ·Electricity,steam,heating or cooling per unit of consumption(e.g.,MWh),broken down by grid region or country;and/or | | | | ·Scope 2 emissions data | Supplier-specific method | | | | ·Utility-specific transmission & distribution loss rate(%),specific to grid where energy is generated and consumed | | | | | Average-data method | | | | | ·Country average transmission & distribution loss rate(%) | | | | | ·Regional average transmission & distribution loss rate(%) | | | | | ·Global average transmission & distribution loss rate(%) | | | | * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 3 (Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in scope 1 or scope 2) (continued) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factor Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | D. Generation of purchased electricity that is sold to end users | | | | | Supplier-specific or average-data method | sum across suppliers, regions or countries: | | | | ∑(electricity purchased for resale(kWh)×electricity life cycle emission factor(kgCO2e)/kWh) | | | | - (steam purchased for resale(kWh)×steam life cycle emission factor(kgCO2e)/kWh) - (heating purchased for resale(kWh)×heating life cycle emission factor(kgCO2e)/kWh) - (cooling purchased for resale(kWh)×cooling life cycle emission factor(kgCO2e)/kWh) \| Quantities and specific source(e.g., generation unit) of electricity purchased and re-sold \| Supplier-specific method Specific emissions data for generation unit from which purchased power is generated Average-data method Grid average rate for the origin of purchased power \| * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 4 (Upstream transportation and distribution) * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 4 (Upstream transportation and distribution) (continued) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factors Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Distance-based method | sum across transport modes and/or vehicle types: | | | | ∑(mass of goods purchased (tonnes or volume) | | | | | × distance travelled in transport leg(km) | | | | | × emission factor of transport mode or vehicle type(kg CO2e/tonne or volume/km)) | Mass or volume of the products sold | | | | Actual distances provided by transportation suppliers | | | | | Online maps or calculators; | | | | | and/or | | | | | Published port-to-port travel distances | Emission factor by mode of transport(e.g. rail, air, etc) or vehicle types(e.g. articulated lorry, container vessel, etc), expressed in units of greenhouse gases(CO2, CH4,N2O) per unit of mass(tonne)or volume(e.g., TEU) travelled(e.g.,km) | | | | Spend-based method | sum across transport modes and/or vehicle types: | | | | ∑(amount spent on transportation by type($) | | | | | × relevant EEIO emission factors per unit of economic value(kg CO2e/$)) | Amount spent on transportation by type(e.g. road, rail, air, barge), using market values(e.g.,dollars). | Cradle-to-gate emission factors of the transportation type per unit of economic value(e.g.,kg CO2e/$) | | | Where applicable, inflation data to convert market values between the year of the EEIO emissions factors and the year of the activity data. | | | | | Calculating Emissions From Distribution | | | | | Site-specific method | for each storage facility: | | | | emissions of storage facility(kg CO2e)= | | | | | (fuel consumed(kWh)× fuel emission factor(kg CO2e/kWh)) | | | | - (electricity consumed(kWh)× electricity emission factor(kg CO2e/kWh)) - (quantity of refrigerant leakage(kg)× global warming potential for the refrigerant(e.g.,kg CO2e)) then, allocate emissions based on volume that company's products take within storage facility: allocated emissions of storage facility volume of reporting company's purchased goods(m3) total volume of goods in storage facility(m3) × emissions of storage facility(kg CO2e) finally, sum across all storage facilities: Σ allocated emissions of storage facility \| Site-specific fuel,electricity use,and Site-specific refrigerant leakage The average occupancy rate of the storage facility(i.e.,average total volume of goods stored) \| Site or regionally specific emission factors for energy sources(e.g.,electricity and fuels)per unit of consumption(e.g.,kg CO2e/kWh for electricity,kg CO2e/liter for diesel)和 Refrigerant emission factors of fugitive and process emissions(kg HFC/kg of refrigerant leakage) \| * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 4 (Upstream transportation and distribution) (continued) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factors Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Average-data method | sum across storage facilities: | | | | ∑(volume of stored goods(m3or pallet or TEU)×average number of days stored(days) | | | | | × emission factor for storage facility(kgCO2e/m3or pallet or TEU/day)) | Companies should collect data based upon the throughput | | | | Volume of purchased goods that are stored(e.g.,m2,m3,pallet,TEU)or number of pallets needed to store purchased goods | | | | | Average number of days that goods are stored | Companies should collect data which allows the calculation of emissions per unit stored.This can be expressed in several different ways,including; | | | | Emission factor per pallet stored in facility | | | | | Emission factor per m2/m3stored in facility | | | | | Emission factor per TEU(twenty-foot equivalent unit)stored in facility | | | | * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 5 (Waste generated in operations) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factors Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Supplier-specific method | sum across waste treatment providers:Σallocated scope 1 and 2 emissions of waste treatment company | Allocated scope 1 and 2 emissions of waste-treatment company(allocated to the waste collected from the reporting company) | If using the waste treatment company method,the reporting company collects emissions data from waste treatment companies,so no emission factors are required(the w company would have already used emission factors to calculate the emissions). | | Waste-type-specific method | sum across waste types:Σ(waste produced(tonnes or m3)×waste type and waste treatment specific emission factor(kg CO2e/tonne or m3)) | Waste produced(e.g.,tonne,m3)和 type of different waste generated in operationsFor each waste type,specific waste treatment method applied(e.g.,landfilled,incinerated,recycled,etc.) | Waste type-specific and waste treatment-specific emission factors.The emission factors should include end-of-life processes only.Emission factors may include emissions from transportation of waste. | | Average-data method | sum across waste treatment methods:Σ(total mass of waste(tonnes)×proportion of total waste being treated by waste treatment method×emission factor of waste treatment method(kg CO2e/tonne)) | Total mass of waste generated in operationsProportion of this waste being treated by different methods(e.g.,% landfilled,incinerated,recycled,etc) | Average waste treatment specific emission factors based upon all waste disposal types | * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 6 (Business travel) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factor Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Fuel-based method | sum across fuel types: | | | | Σ(quantity of fuel consumed(liters)× emission factor for the fuel(e.g.,kgCO2e/liter)) | | | | | +sum across grid regions: | | | | | Σ(quantity of electricity consumed(kWh)× emission factor for electricity grid(e.g.,kgCO2e/kWh)) | | | | | +sum across refrigerant and air-conditioning types: | | | | | Σ(quantity of refrigerant leakage×global warming potential for the refrigerant(e.g.,kgCO2e)) | | | | | If fuel data is unavailable, companies may use the following two formulae to calculate quantities of fuel consumed: | | | | | Calculating fuel use from fuel spend | | | | | sum across fuel types: | | | | | total fuel spend(e.g.,$) | | | | | Σaverage fuel price(e.g.,5/liter) | Quantities of fuel(e.g.,diesel,gasoline,jet fuel,biofuels,etc.) consumed; | | | | Amount spent on fuel and average cost of fuel | | | | | Fugitive emissions(e.g.,refrigerant leakage);and | | | | | If applicable: | | | | | Distance travelled; | | | | | Average fuel efficiency of the vehicle | Life cycle fuel emission factors, expressed in units of emissions per unit of energy consumed(e.g.,kgCO2e/liters,kgCO2e/Btu,etc.) | | | | For electric vehicles (if applicable), electricity emission factors, expressed in units of emissions per unit of electricity consumed(e.g.,kgCO2e/kWh) | | | | | Fugitive emission factors, expressed in units of emissions per unit of fugitive emission(e.g.,kgCO2e/kg refrigerant leakage) | | | | | Distance-based method | sum across vehicle types: | | | | Σ(distance travelled by vehicle type(vehicle-km or passenger-km) | | | | | × vehicle specific emission factor(kgCO2e/vehicle-km or kgCO2e/passenger-km)) | | | | | (optional) | | | | | Σ(annual number of hotel nights(nights)×hotel emission factor(kgCO2e/night)) | Total distance travelled by each mode of transport(air,train,bus,car,etc.)for all employees in the reporting year. | | | | Countries of travel(since transportation emission factors vary by country). | | | | | Specific types of vehicles used for travel(since transportation emission factors vary by vehicle types)from transport providers | Emission factors that represent kilograms of CO2emitted per kilometer or passenger-kilometer for each mode of transport(e.g.,aircraft,rail,metro,bus,taxi,bus,etc.) | | | | For electric vehicles (if applicable), electricity emission factors, expressed in units of emissions per kilometer or passenger-kilometer | | | | * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 7 (Employee commuting) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factor Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Fuel-based method | sum across fuel types: | | | | Σ(quantity of fuel consumed(liters)× emission factor for the fuel(e.g.,kgCO2e/liter)) | | | | | +sum across grid regions: | | | | | Σ(quantity of electricity consumed(kWh)× emission factor for electricity grid(e.g.,kgCO2e/kWh)) | | | | | +sum across refrigerant and air-conditioning types: | | | | | Σ(quantity of refrigerant leakage×global warming potential for the refrigerant(e.g.,kgCO2e)) | | | | | If fuel data is unavailable, companies may use the following two formulae to calculate quantities of fuel consumed: | | | | | Calculating fuel use from fuel spend | | | | | sum across fuel types: | | | | | total fuel spend(e.g.,S) | | | | | Σaverage fuel price(e.g.,$/liter) | | | | | Calculating fuel use from distance travelled | | | | | sum across transport steps: | | | | | Σ(total distance travelled(e.g.,km)×fuel efficiency of vehicle(e.g.,liters/km)) | Quantities of fuel(e.g.,diesel gasolineJet fuel,biofuels,etc.) consumed; | | | | Amount spent on fuel and average cost of fuel | Life cycle fuel emission factors, expressed in units of emissions per unit of energy consumed(e.g.,kgCO2e/liters,CO2e/ktu, etc.) | | | | For electric vehicles (if applicable), electricity emission factors, expressed in units of emissions per unit of electricity consumed(e.g.,kgCO2e/kwh) | | | | | Distance-based method | first,sum across all employees to determine total distance travelled using each vehicle type: | | | | total distance travelled by vehicle type(vehicle-km or passenger-km)=∑(daily one-way distance between home and work(km)×2×number of commuting days per year) | | | | | then,sum across vehicle types to determine total emissions: | | | | | kgCO2e from employee commuting=∑(total distance travelled by vehicle type(vehicle-km or passenger-km) | | | | | ×vehicle specific emission factor(kgCO2e/vehicle-km or kgCO2e/passenger-km)) | | | | | (optionally)for each energy source used in teleworking: | | | | | ∑(quantities of energy consumed(kWh)×emission factor for energy source(kgCO2e/kwh)) | Total distance travelled by employees over the reporting period | | | | Mode of transport used for commuting(e.g.,train,subway,bus,car,bicycle,etc.) | Emission factors for each mode of transport(usually expressed in units of greenhouse gas(CO2,CH4,N2O或CO2e) emitted per passenger-kilometer travelled) | | | | Average-data method | sum across each transport mode: | | | | Σ(total number of employees×% of employees using mode of transport×one way commuting distance(vehicle-km or passenger-km)×2×working days per year× emission factor of transport mode(kgCO2e/vehicle-km or kgCO2e/passenger-km)) | Number of employees | | | | Average distance travelled by an average employees per day | | | | | Average breakdown of transport modes used by employees | | | | | Average number working days per year | Emission factors for each mode of transport(usually expressed in units of greenhouse gas(CO2,CH4,N2O或CO2e) emitted per passenger-kilometer travelled) | | | (..99,\\mathsf{k m})\\times\\mathsf{F u e l} (\\mathrm{C O} _{_ ^{2}}\\mathrm{C H}\_{^{prime}} (C O\_{2},C H\_{4},N\_{2}O,O{\\uparrow} \\mathrm{C O}\_{2}( * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 8 (Upstream Leased Assets) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factor Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Asset-specific method | calculate the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions associated with each leased asset: | | | | scope 1 emissions of leased asset | | | | | = Σ(quantity of fuel consumed(e.g., litre)× emission factor for fuel source(e.g.,kg CO\_e/liter)) | | | | - Σ(quantity of refrigerant leakage(kg)× emission factor for refrigerant(kg CO\_e/kg)) - process emissions scope 2 emissions of leased asset = Σ(quantity of electricity, steam, heating, cooling consumed(e.g.,kWh) × emission factor for electricity, steam, heating, cooling(e.g.,kg CO\_e/kWh)) then sum across leased assets: Σscope 1 and scope 2 emissions of each leased asset For leased building spaces not sub-metered by the tenant,the following formula can be used to allocate emissions: energy use from leased space(kwh) = reporting company's area(m²)/building's total area(m)× building's occupancy rate(e.g.,0.75) × building's total energy use(kWh) \| Asset-specific fuel use; electricity,steam,heating and cooling use;process emissions,and fugitive emissions(e.g.,refrigerant leakage),or. Asset-specific scope 1 and scope 2 emissions data \| Site or regionally specific emission factors for energy sources(e.g.,electricity and fuels)per unit of consumption(e.g.,kg CO\_e/kWh for electricity,kg CO\_e/liter for diesel);and Emission factors of fugitive and process emissions \| \| Lessor-specific method \| calculate the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions associated with each lessor: scope 1 emissions of lessor = Σ(quantity of fuel consumed(e.g.,litre)× emission factor for fuel source(e.g.,kg CO\_e/liter)) - Σ((quantity of refrigerant leakage(kg)× emission factor for refrigerant(kg CO\_e/kg)) - process emissions scope 2 emissions of lessor = Σ(quantity of electricity,steam, heating, cooling consumed(e.g.,kWh) × emission factor for electricity,steam, heating, cooling(e.g.,kg CO\_e/kWh)) then allocate emissions from each lessor and then sum across lessors: ∑scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of lessor(kg CO\_e) ×area,volume,quantity,etc.of the leased asset total area,volume,quantity,etc.oflesser assets \| Lessor's fuel use,electricity use process emissions and fugive emissions(refrigerant leakage),or. Lessor's scope 1 and scope 2 emissions data Physical or financial data for allocation(e.g.,total area/volume/quantity of lessor's assets and total area/volume/quantity of leased assets \| Site or regionally specific emission factors for energy sources(e.g.,electricity and fuels)per unit of consumption(e.g.,kg CO\_e/kWh for electricity,kg CO\_e/liter for diesel);and Emission factors of fugive and process emissions \| \| Average-data method \| sum across building types: ∑(total floor space of building type(m²)=average emission factor for building type(kg CO\_e/m²/year)) Reporting company's scope 3 emissions from leased assets other than buildings and for leased buildings where floor space data is unavailable: sum across asset types: ∑(number of assets & average emissions per asset type(kg CO\_e/assets type/year)) \| Floor space of each leased asset Number of leased assets,by building type;and/or Number of leased assets that give rise to Scope 2 emissions of company cars,trucks,etc. \| Average emission factors by floor space,expressed in units of emissions per square meter,square foot occupied(e.g.,kg CO\_e/m²/year) Average emission factors by building type,expressed in units of emissions per building(e.g.,kg CO\_e/small office block/year) Emission factors by asset type,expressed in units of emissions per asset(e.g.,kg CO\_e/car/year) \| Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 9 (Downstream transportation and distribution) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factors Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Calculating Emissions from Transportation | | | | | Fuel-based method | sum across fuel types: | | | | Σ(quantity of fuel consumed(liters)×emission factor for the fuel(e.g.,kgCO2e/liter)) | | | | | sum across grid regions: | | | | | Σ(quantity of electricity consumed(WWh)×emission factor for electricity grid(e.g.,kgCO2e/kWh) | | | | | +sum across refrigerant and air-conditioning types: | | | | | Σ(quantity of refrigerant leakage×global warming potential for the refrigerant(e.g.,kgCO2e)) | | | | If fuel data is unavailable, companies may use the following two formulae to calculate quantities of fuel consumed: Calculating fuel use from fuel spend sum across fuel types: total fuel spend(e.g.,$) Σaverage fuel price(e.g.,$/liter) Calculating fuel use from distance travelled sum across transport steps: Σ(total distance travelled(e.g.,km)×fuel efficiency of vehicle(e.g.,liters/km)) Allocated fuel use= =total fuel consumed(litres)×mass/volume of company's goods/mass/volume of goods transported Companies may optionally substitute mass of goods by volume with dimensional mass or chargeable mass where data is available to prove that the alternative method is more suitable. Dimensional mass is a calculated mass that takes into account packaging volume as well as the actual mass of the goods. Chargeable mass is the higher value of either the actual or the dimensional mass of the goods. (Optional CO2 emissions from unladen backhaul) For each fuel type: Σ(quantity of fuel consumed from backhaul×emission factor for the fuel(e.g.,kgCO2e/liter)) where: quantity of fuel consumed from backhaul =average efficiency of vehicles unladed(i/km)×total distance travelled unladen \| Quantities of fuel (e.g., diesel, gasoline,jet fuel,biofuels,etc.) consumed; Amount spent on fuel and average cost of fuel Amount of refrigerant leakage;and If applicable: Distance travelled: Average fuel efficiency of the vehicle,expressed in units of liters of fuel consumed per tonne per kilometer transported; Mass of purchased goods in the vehicle(tonnes) Information on whether the products are refrigerated during transport \| Fuel emission factors, expressed in units of emissions per unit of energy consumed(e.g.,kgCO2e/liters,CO2e/Btu,ect.) For electric vehicles(Fapplicable),electric emission factors,expressed in units of emissions per unit of electricity consumed(e.g.,kgCO2e/kWh) Refrigerant leakage emission factors,expressed in units of emissions per unit of refrigerant leaked(e.g.,kgCO2e/kg leakage) Emission factors should include scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of the fuel and optionally include cradle-to-gate emissions. \| (Optional) CO2 e emissions from unladen backhaul = for each fuel type: ∑ (quantity of fuel consumed from backhaul × emission factor for the fuel (e.g., kg CO2e/liter)) * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 9 (Downstream transportation and distribution) (continued) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factors Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Distance-based method | sum across transport modes and/or vehicle types: | | | | Σ(mass of goods purchased (tonnes or volume) | | | | | × distance travelled in transport leg(km) | | | | | × emission factor of transport mode or vehicle type(kg CO2/e/tonne or volume/km)) | Mass or volume of the products sold | | | | Actual distances provided by transportation suppliers | | | | | Online maps or calculators; and/or published port-to-port travel distances | Emission factor by mode of transport(e.g.rail,air,etc)or vehicle types(e.g.articulated lorry,container vessel,etc), expressed in units of greenhouse gases(CO2,CH4,R2O)per unit of mass(tonne)or volume(e.g.TEU)travelled(e.g.km) | | | | Spend-based method | sum across transport modes and/or vehicle types: | | | | Σ(amount spent on transportation by type($) | | | | | × relevant EI/O emission factors per unit of economic value(kg CO2/e/S)) | Amount spent on transportation by type(e.g.road,rail,air,barge), using market values(e.g.,dollars). | | | | Where applicable, initiation data to convert market values between the year of the EI/O emissions factors and the year of the activity data. | Cradle-to-gate emission factors of the transportation type per unit of economic value(e.g.kg CO2/e/S) | | | | Where applicable, initiation data to convert market values between the year of the EI/O emissions factors and the year of the activity data. | | | | | Calculating Emissions from Distribution | | | | | Site-specific method | for each storage facility: | | | | emissions of storage facility(kg CO2e) | | | | | =fuel consumed(WWh)× fuel emission factor(kg CO2e/kWh) | | | | | +(electricity consumed(WWh)× electricity emission factor(kg CO2e/kWh) | | | | | +(refrigerant leakage)(kg) | | | | | × refrigerant emission factor(e.g.kg HFCkg of refrigerant leakage)) | | | | | then,allocate emissions based on volume that company's products take within storage facility: | | | | | allocated emissions of storage facility= | | | | | volume of reporting company's purchased goods(m3) | | | | | total volume of goods in storage facility(m3) | | | | | × emissions of storage facility(kg CO2e) | Site-specific fuel,electricity use; | | | | and | | | | | Site-specific refrigerant leakage | | | | | The average occupancy rate of the storage facility(i.e.,average total volume of goods stored) | Site or regionally specific emission factors for energy sources(e.g.electricity and fuels)per unit of consumption(e.g.kg CO2e/kWh)for electricity,kg CO2e/litter for diesel);and | | | | Refrigerant emission factors of fugitive and process emissions(kg HFC/kg of refrigerant leakage) | | | | | Average-data method | sum across storage facilities: | | | | Σ(volume of stored goods(m3)or pallet or TEU)×average number of days stored(days) | | | | | × emission factor for storage facility(kg CO2e/m3)or pallet or TEU/day) | Companies should collect data based upon the throughout | | | | Volume of purchased goods that are stored(e.g.m3,m2,pallet,TEU)or number of pallets needed to store purchased goods | | | | | Average number of days that goods are stored | Companies should collect data which allow the calculation of emissions per unit stored. This can be expressed in several different ways, including: | | | | Emission factor per pallet stored in facility | | | | | Emission factor per m3/m2 stored in facility | | | | | Emission factor per TEU(twenty-foot equivalent unit) stored in facility | | | | * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 10 (Processing of Sold Products) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factor Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Site-specific method | sum across fuel consumed in the processing of sold intermediate products: | | | | Σ(quantity of fuel consumed(e.g.,liter) | | | | | × life cycle emission factor for fuel source(e.g.,kg CO2e/liter)) | | | | | + | | | | sum across electricity consumed in the processing of sold intermediate products: Σ(quantity of electricity consumed(kWh) × life cycle emission factor for electricity(e.g.,kg CO2e/kWh)) + sum across refrigerants used in the processing of sold intermediate products: Σ(quantity of refrigerant leakage(kg)×Global Warming Potential for refrigerant(kgCO2e/kg)) + sum across process emissions released in the processing of sold intermediate products + to the extent possible, sum across waste generated in the in the processing of sold intermediate products: Σ(mass of waste output(kg)×emission factor for waste activity(kgCO2e/kg)) \| Companies should first collect data on the types and quantities of intermediate goods sold by the reporting company. Companies should then collect either site-specific CHG emissions data provided by downstream value chain partners, or site-specific activity data from downstream processes, including: • Quantities of energy (including electricity and fuels) consumed in process(es) • To the extent possible, mass of waste generated in process(es); and • If applicable, activity data related to non-combustion emissions(i.e.,industrial process or fugitive emissions) \| If site-specific activity data is collected, companies should also collect: • Emission factors for fuels • Emission factors for electricity To the extent possible, emission factors for waste outputs; and If applicable, emission factors related to non-combustion emissions(i.e.,industrial process or fugitive emissions) \| \| Average-data method \| sum across intermediate products: Σ(mass of sold intermediate product(kg) × emission factor of processing of sold products(kgCO2e/kg of final product)) \| For each type of sold intermediate product, companies should collect data on: • The process(es) involved in transforming or processing sold intermediate products into an usable state final product, subsequent to sale by the reporting company; • Information needed for allocation(e.g.,mass,economic value,etc.) \| Companies should collect either: • Average emission factors for down-stream processes to transform the sold intermediate product, expressed in units of emissions(e.g.,CO2,CH4,N2O) per unit of product(e.g.,kgCO2/kg of final product) Or: • Life cycle emission factors of sold products • Life cycle emission factors of final products \| * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 11 (Use of sold products) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factor Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Direct Use-Phase Emissions | | | | | Products that directly consume energy (fuels or electricity) during use | sum across fuels consumed from use of products:Σ(total lifetime expected uses of product×number sold in reporting period×fuel consumed per use(kWh)×emission factor for fuel(kgCO2e/kWh)+sum across electricity consumed from use of products:Σ(total lifetime expected uses of product×number sold in reporting period×electricity consumed per use(kWh)×emission factor for electricity(kgCO2e/kWh)+sum across refrigerant leakage from use of products:Σ(total lifetime expected uses of product×number sold in reporting period×refrigerant leakage per use(kg)×global warming potential(kgCO2e/kg)) | Total lifetime expected uses of product(g)和Quantities of products soldFuel used per use of productElectricity consumption per use of productRefrigerant leakage per use of product | Emission factors for fuelsEmission factors for electricityEmission factors for refrigerants | | Fuels and Feed-stocks | sum across fuels/feedstocks:Σ(total quantity of fuel/feedstock sold(e.g.,kWh)×combustion emission factor for fuel/feedstock(e.g.,kgCO2e/kWh)) | Total quantities of fuels/feed-stocks sold | Combustion emission factors of fuel/feedstock | | Greenhouse gases and products that contain or form greenhouse gases that are emitted during use | sum across GHGs released in a product or product group:Σ(GHG contained per product×Total Number of products sold×% of GHG released during lifetime use of product×GWP of the GHG)then:sum across products or product groups:Σ(use phase emissions From product or product group1,2,3...)Note:if the % released is unknown 100% should be assumed. | Total quantities of products soldQuantities of GHGs contained per product% of GHGs released throughout the lifetime of the product | GWP of the GHGs contained in the product, expressed in units of carbon dioxide per unit kilogram of the GHG(e.g.,25 kgCO2/kg) | * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 11 (Use of sold products) (continued) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factor Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Indirect Use-Phase Emissions | | | | | Products that indirectly consume energy (fuels or electricity) during use | The generation of a typical use phase may be difficult as the same product may consume more or less energy dependent on the conditions in which it is used. For example, a potato may be roasted, boiled and microwaved, each using different amount of energy and hence different emissions. Companies may choose to identify several different use-phase scenarios for a product and create a weighted average based upon actual activity. | | | | sum across fuels consumed from use scenarios: | | | | | Σ(total lifetime expected uses of product×% of total lifetime uses using this scenario×number sold in reporting period×fuel consumed per use in this scenario(e.g.,kWh× emission factor for fuel)(e.g.,kg CO2,e/kWh)) | | | | - \| Average number of uses over lifetime of product Average use scenarios(e.g.,weighted average of scenarios) Fuel consumed in use scenarios Electricity consumed in use scenarios Refrigerant leakage in use scenarios GHG emitted indirectly in use scenarios \| Combustion emission factors of fuels and electricity GWP of GHGs \| \| sum across electricity consumed from use scenarios: Σ(total lifetime expected uses of product×% of total lifetime uses using this scenario×number sold in reporting period×electricity consumed per use in this scenario(kWh× emission factor for electricity)(kg CO2,e/kWh)) - \| Average number of uses over lifetime of product Average use scenarios(e.g.,weighted average of scenarios) Fuel consumed in use scenarios Electricity consumed in use scenarios Refrigerant leakage in use scenarios GHG emitted indirectly in use scenarios \| \| \| \| sum across refrigerant leakage from use scenarios: Σ(total lifetime expected uses of product×% of total lifetime uses using this scenario×number sold in reporting period×refrigerant leakage per use in this scenario(kg× emission factor for refrigerant)(kg CO2,e/kg)) - \| Average number of uses over lifetime of product Average use scenarios(e.g.,weighted average of scenarios) Fuel consumed in use scenarios Electricity consumed in use scenarios Refrigerant leakage in use scenarios GHG emitted indirectly in use scenarios \| \| \| \| sum across GHG emitted indirectly from use scenarios: Σ(total lifetime expected uses of product×% of total lifetime uses using this scenario×number sold in reporting period×GHG emitted indirectly(kg)×GWP of the GHG) \| \| \| \| \| Intermediate products that directly consume energy(fuels or electricity) during use \| sum across sold intermediate products total use phase emissions: Σ(total intermediate products sold×total lifetime uses of final sold product×emissions per use of sold intermediate product(kgCO2,e/use)) \| Type(s) of final product(s) produced from reporting company's intermediate product(s) Percentage of reporting company's intermediate product:sales going to each type of final product Activity data required to calculate the use-phase emission of the final product will be the same as described previously in this chapter. \| Depending on the type of final product, emission factors required will be the same as described earlier in this chapter. \| * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 12 (End-of-life treatment of sold products) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factor Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Waste-type-specific method | sum across waste treatment methods for sold products and packaging: | | | | ∑(total mass of sold products and packaging from point of sale to end of life after consumer use(kg) | | | | | ×% of total waste being1 treated by waste treatment method | | | | | × emission factor of waste treatment method(kgCO2e/kg)) | Total mass of sold products and packaging from the point of sale by the reporting company to the end-of-life after consumer use(including packaging used to transport products through to the point of retail and any packaging that is disposed of prior to the end-of-life of the final product. | | | | Proportion of this waste being treated by different methods(e.g.,% landfilled, incinerated, recycled, etc.) | Average waste treatment specific emission factors based upon all waste disposal types | | | Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 13 (Downstream Leased Assets) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factor Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Asset-specific method | calculate the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions associated with each leased asset: | | | | scope 1 emissions of leased asset | | | | | = Σ(quantity of fuel consumed(e.g., liter)× emission factor for fuel source(e.g.,kg CO2e/liter)) | | | | - Σ((quantity of refrigerant leakage(kg)× emission factor for refrigerant(kgCO2e/kg)) - process emissions) scope 2 emissions of leased asset = Σ(quantity of electricity,steam,heating,cooling consumed(e.g.,kWh) × emission factor for electricity,steam,heating,cooling(e.g.,kgCO2e/kWh)) \| Asset-specific fuel use; electricity,steam, heating and cooling use;process emissions;and fugitive emissions(e.g.,refrigerant leakage),or; Asset-specific scope 1 and scope 2 emissions data \| Site or regionally specific emission factors for energy sources(e.g.,electricity and fuels) per unit of consumption(e.g.,kg CO2e/kWh for electricity,kg CO2e/liter for diesel);and Emission factors of fugitive and process emissions \| \| \| then sum across leased assets: Σscope 1 and scope 2 emissions of each leased asset \| \| \| \| \| For leased building spaces not sub-metered by the tenant,the following formula can be used to allocate emissions: energy use from leased space(kWh) = reporting company's area(m2)/building's total area(m2) × building's occupancy rate(e.g.,0.75))× building's total energy use(kWh) \| \| \| * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 13 (Downstream Leased Assets) (continued) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factor Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Lessee-specific method | calculate the scope 1 and scope 2 emissions associated with each lessee: | | | | scope 1 emissions of lessee | | | | | = Σ(quantity of fuel consumed(e.g.,liter)×emission factor for fuel source(e.g.,kg CO2e/liter)) | | | | - Σ((quantity of refrigerant leakage(kg)×emission factor for refrigerant(kg CO2e/kg))+process emissions) scope 2 emissions of lessee = Σ(quantity of electricity,steam,heating,cooling consumed(e.g.,kWh) ×emission factor for electricity,steam,heating,cooling(e.g.,kg CO2e/kWh)) then allocate emissions from each lessee and then sum across lessees: Σscope 1 and scope 2 emissions of lessee(kg CO2e) ×(area,volume,quantity,etc.,of the leased asset)/(total area,volume,quantity,etc. of lessee assets) \| ·Lessee's fuel use,electricity use process emissions and fugitive emissions(refrigerant leakage),or; ·Lessee's scope 1 and scope 2 emissions data ·Physical or financial data for allocation(e.g.,total area/volume/quntility of lessee's assets and total area/volume/quantity of leased assets \| ·Site or regionally specific emission factors for energy sources(e.g.,electricity and fuels) per unit of consumption(e.g.,kg CO2e/kWh for electricity,kg CO2e/liter for diesel);and ·Emission factors of fugitive and process emissions \| \| Average-data method \| Reporting company's scope 3 emissions from leased assets(downstream): sum across building types: Σ(total floor space of building type(m2))×average emission factor for building type(kgCO2e/m2/year)) reporting company's scope 3 emissions from leased assets other than buildings and for leased buildings where floor space data is unavailable: sum across asset types: Σ(number of assets×average emissions per asset type(kgCO2e/assets type/year)) \| ·Floor space of each leased asset ·Number of leased assets,by building type,and/or ·Number of leased assets that give rise to Scope 2 emissions(e.g.,company cars,trucks,etc). \| ·Average emission factors by floor space,expressed in units of emissions per square meter,square foot occupied(e.g.,kgCO2e/m2/year); ·Average emission factors by building type,expressed in units of emissions per building(e.g.,kgCO2e/small office block/year) ·Emission factors by asset type,expressed in units of emissions per asset(e.g.,kgCO2e/car/year) \| * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 14 (Franchises) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factor Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Franchise-specific method | sum across franchises: | | | | ∑(scope 1 emissions+scope 2 emissions of each franchise(kg CO2e)) | | | | | If franchise buildings are not submetered,the following equation can be used: | | | | | energy use from franchise(kWh) | | | | | = (franchise's area(m2))/ (building's total area(m2) | | | | | × building's occupancy rate)× building's total energy use(kWh) | Companies should collect data on either: | | | | ·Scope 1 and scope 2 emissions data from franchisees;or | | | | | ·Site-specific fuel use, electricity use,and other process and fugitive emissions activity data | If collecting fuel and energy data,companies should also collect: | | | | ·Site- or regionally-specific emission factors for energy sources(e.g.,electricity and fuels) per unit of consumption(e.g.,kg CO2e/kWh for electricity,kg CO2e/liter for diesel);and | | | | | ·Emission factors of process emissions(e.g.,refrigeration and air conditioning) | | | | | Average-data method | For leased buildings(if floor space data is available),sum across building types: | | | | sum across building types: | | | | | ∑(total floor space of building type(m2)× average emission factor for building type(kg CO2e/m2/year)) | | | | | For other asset types or for leased buildings where floor space data is not available,sum across building/assets types: | | | | | sum across building/assets types: | | | | | ∑(number of buildings or assets | | | | | × average emissions per building or asset type per year(kg CO2e/building or asset type/year)) | Floor space of each franchise,by floor space | | | | Number of franchises,by building type | | | | | Number of franchise assets that give rise to Scope 2 emissions(e.g.,company cars,trucks,etc). | Average emission factors by floor space,expressed in units of emissions per square meter,square foot occupied(e.g.,kg CO2e/m2) | | | | Average emission factors by building type,expressed in units of emissions per building(e.g.,kg CO2e/small office block) | | | | | Emission factors by asset type,expressed in units of emissions per asset(e.g.,kg CO2e/car) | | | | * * * Summary of Calculation Methods for Category 15 (Investments) | Method | Calculation Formula | Activity Data Needed | Emission Factor Needed | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Calculating emissions from equity investments | | | | | Investment-specific method | sum across equity investments:Σ(scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of equity investment×share of equity(%)) | ·Scope 1 and 2 emissions of investee company·The investor's proportional share of equity in the investee·If significant, companies should also collect scope 3 emissions of investee company (if investee companies are unable to provide scope 3 emissions data,scope 3 emissions may need to be estimated using the Average-data method) | ·If using the investment-specific method,the reporting company collects emissions data from investees,so no emission factors are required | | Average-data method | sum across equity investments:Σ(investee company total revenue($)×emission factor for investee's sector(kg CO,e/$ revenue))×share of equity(%) | Sector(s)the investee company operates in;Revenue of investee company (if the investee company operates in more than one sector,the reporting company should collect data on the revenue for each sector in which the investee company operates);andThe investor's proportional share of equity in the investee | EEIO emission factors for the sectors of the economy that the investments are related to(kg CO,e/$ revenue) | | Calculating emissions from project finance and from debt investments with known use of proceeds | | | | | Project-specific method | sum across projects:Σ(scope 1 and scope 2 emissions of relevant project in the reporting year×share of total project costs(%) | ·Scope 1 and 2 emissions that occur in the reporting year for the relevant projects·The investor's proportional share of total project costs(total equity plus debt) | ·If using the project-specific method,the reporting company collects emissions data from investees,so no emission factors are required | | Average-data method | sum across projects in the construction phase:Σ(project construction cost in the reporting year($)×emission factor of relevant construction sector(kg CO,e/$ revenue))×share of total project costs(%) | ·Project costs in the reporting year(if the project is in the construction phase);orRevenue of the project(if the project is in the operational phase);andThe investor's proportional share of total project costs(total equity plus debt). | EEIO emission factors for the relevant construction sector that the investments are related to(kg CO,e/$)(if the project is in the construction phase);orEEIO emission factors for the relevant operating sector that the investments are related to(kg CO,e/$)(if the project is in the operational phase) | | Calculating total projected lifetime emissions from project finance and debt investments with known use of proceeds | | | | | Project-specific method | Σ((projected annual emissions of project×project lifespan of project)×share of total project costs(%) | Calculating projected lifetime emissions typically requires making assumptions about the operation of the asset and its expected lifetime.The data needed to calculate expected emissions will depend on the type of project.Companies should collect:Expected average annual emissions of project.For power plants for example,emissions can be derived from the | |